Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What Were the Causes That Led to the Deepwater Horizon Blowout and Explosion?
The Oil Drum ^ | June 19, 2010 | William Semple

Posted on 06/19/2010 10:08:15 AM PDT by worst-case scenario

This is a guest post by William Semple. Mr. Semple is a drilling engineer and independent drilling consultant with 37 years of experience in the oil and gas industry. He worked for 16 years with a major oil company and has 24 years of experience as a drilling supervisor.

Mississippi Canyon 252 Macondo Well 24th April 2010 at approximately 21:49 hrs

I have summarized the information to try and keep it to the salient facts. The following information is from reliable sources. Most is public record and the remainder is from confidential reviews carried out by other major oil companies. I have interpreted the reports and made some conclusions with caveats where necessary. As such, these are only opinions and no inference of blame can be inferred as a result of these statements.

More detail will emerge when further investigations take place, especially with regard to the last few hours leading up to the explosion. However, I am confident the fundamentals are identified in this article and, most importantly, the crucial lessons learned so none of us repeat the same mistakes.

Much is being made of the water depth as a factor in this disaster. However, many of the mistakes made would have been equally serious in shallow-water drilling or even on land, and lessons learned apply to almost all drilling operations.

(Excerpt) Read more at theoildrum.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; US: Louisiana
KEYWORDS: blowout; bp; deephorz; deepwaterhorizon; energy; gulf; offshore; oil; oilspill
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last
To: stylecouncilor

Good discussion bump


21 posted on 06/19/2010 10:38:57 AM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: deport

If we can weigh it down why hasn’t it been done, would be the next logical question. :) I still don’t see a self restricting blowout.


22 posted on 06/19/2010 10:40:44 AM PDT by allmost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: worst-case scenario

I will wait to see the actual analysis from the people with access to all of the facts...not speculation about what might have happened, even informed speculation.

Equipment that was supposed to work didn’t. Did they use foreign casing? Who built the blow-out preventer? Was somebody drunk or stoned? (like on the Exxon Valdez). Did they use approved practices? What did MMS approve? Did Trans-Oceanic employees cause the problem?

As far as I can see BP is the only group actually doing something and the people most critical of them may have had a hand in causing the problem in the first place.

So far, “the greatest environmental disaster ever” hasn’t even happened yet. It is all anticipation and finger pointing. There have been few beach closings. Only 30% of Gulf fishing waters are closed. It is the hype and fear mongering that has caused the current problem. BO’s moratorium based on a lie is hurting people the most.

The lawyers and the Democrats have $20 Billion reasons to promote the disaster as long as they can blame BP for it.


23 posted on 06/19/2010 10:40:51 AM PDT by HospiceNurse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: allmost

Self crimped? They had a mile of riser pipe on top of the Blow-Out-Preventer.

When the Deepwater Horizon sank, all of that pipe, still attached to the top of the BOP, simply fell over.

When it fell over the pipe bent and crimped at the bend point.


24 posted on 06/19/2010 10:43:07 AM PDT by Bryan24 (When in doubt, move to the right..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: worst-case scenario

I read on another website (so take this with a grain of salt) that an engineer who claims to have worked with this project said they may have hit a high pressure pocket that was exponentially greater than anything they experienced before and no amount of government planning or safety equipment could have prevented it with the exception of a time machine. (something like 80k psi versus the 2k psi max equipment is rated at).


25 posted on 06/19/2010 10:44:32 AM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: worst-case scenario
Even after there were some indications that all was not well, pumping operations continued. Returns were dumped and the return flow meter was bypassed,so the rig was effectively blind until things started to get quite serious.

Under these strange sets of circumstances, isn't it possible that this was done purposely...that someone in the chain of command on that rig was an activist seeking a disaster...a Crieghton-esque eco-terrorist?

26 posted on 06/19/2010 10:44:43 AM PDT by downtownconservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: plain talk
...but none of the oil companies had a plan to deal with a blowout like this. None of them.

Under Department of the Interior regulations, they weren't required to.

Once the federal government chooses to regulate an activity, they assume a significant portion of the liability.

27 posted on 06/19/2010 10:46:47 AM PDT by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance on Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: allmost
Here is another schematic showing the procedure of cutting the riser at the top of the BOP. When the made the cut at the top of the BOP then all restrictions were gone and it was free flowing from that point. Not sure your question about 'weigh it down'.


28 posted on 06/19/2010 10:46:54 AM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Bryan24

If weight is the only issue then the problem is relatively easy to solve. Pipes do not blow inwards if they are pressurized. This is not a new concept.


29 posted on 06/19/2010 10:47:07 AM PDT by allmost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: allmost

First, you have to understand what they mean by blowing out.

I will tell you, even BP is not sure where all the leaks are coming from.

The term ‘blowing out’ does not mean that the pressure ruptured the outer casing that is below the ocean floor. It might be leaking from between the inner and outer casing.

The author of the article explains that the high pressure gas went up the riser tube and into the pump room on the drilling rig. That is where the explosion likely occurred, and the fires.

So, after two days, the rig sinks, dragging the riser pipe with it. Since the riser pipe is solid, the rig could not sink straight down, but went off at an angle. Which is a good thing because if the DRILLING RIG had landed on top of the BOP assembly, the situation would be horrifically worse.

Take a straw and hold it by the bottom end, about one inch up. Now, take your other hand and put it on top of the straw and start to push down. What happens?

Notice how the straw bends just above your bottom hand and crimps over? Keep bending the straw until it is completely bent over (similar to the way the riser tube is bent over and laying on the ocean floor at this moment).

You may see the straw crack just where the crimp is. That is where the leak above the BOP (just below where they cut the riser tube off and put the cap on) came from. It wasn’t from the pressure blowing a hole in the pipe.

Does that help?


30 posted on 06/19/2010 10:51:18 AM PDT by UCANSEE2 (The Last Boy Scout)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: HospiceNurse

‘Who built the BOP?’...the other day I read that a company named Cameron International (ticker: CAM) built the BOP in question and they appear to be a respected name in the industry. Hope to learn more about this company and their devices.


31 posted on 06/19/2010 10:55:27 AM PDT by dogcaller
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: allmost
A pipe under pressure blows outwards if/when it fails.

The pipe didn't blow out. The seals between the bore casing (the inner pipe) and the outer casing pipe failed. Gas went up the pipe, into the pump room on the rig, and BOOM.

The crimp of the pipe as it was bent over past a 90 degree angle caused metal failure and the leaks.

Go to your basement, unhook the hangers that hold your copper or plastic water lines to the joists, and bend it over 90 degrees. It won't be the pressure that causes the leak, as the pressure was always there. It is the bending that does it.

32 posted on 06/19/2010 10:56:27 AM PDT by UCANSEE2 (The Last Boy Scout)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
I understand that. The relative pressures are no where near correlated however. The pipe broke and crimped itself, restricting the outflow. If sheer weight restricted it then the problem is relatively easy to solve. That does not seem to be the case.
33 posted on 06/19/2010 10:58:02 AM PDT by allmost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
Replaced most of it. It blows out. Not in.
34 posted on 06/19/2010 10:59:08 AM PDT by allmost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: deport
By 'crimping' the poster is referring to the riser tube just above the BOP where it was bent over past a 90 degree angle.

When you bend a pipe to such an extreme, it usually cracks and leaks occur , right at the location of the extreme bend.

35 posted on 06/19/2010 11:00:49 AM PDT by UCANSEE2 (The Last Boy Scout)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: RockyMtnMan

BP *wanted* to drill at this depth because the Macondo Plateau had tremendous reserves under it (as we now have the proof).\

Here are the documents they filed with the MMS explaining that safer technology and the prospect of extremely high-production wells are the main reason they are doing so much deep-water drilling.

http://www.gomr.mms.gov/homepg/offshore/deepwtr.html

If we explore a bit beyond the “wacky environmentalists made them do this” slogan, we find out that this sort of exploration was *entirely the choice of the industry.* They WANT to drill there because it is so profitable.


36 posted on 06/19/2010 11:01:09 AM PDT by worst-case scenario (Striving to reach the light)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: allmost

lol...I was thinking the same thing.


37 posted on 06/19/2010 11:02:37 AM PDT by mad_as_he$$ (Sometimes you have to go to dark places to get to the light....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: deport; allmost
I would of refered to that damage as a “kink” not a crimp.
38 posted on 06/19/2010 11:04:39 AM PDT by mad_as_he$$ (Sometimes you have to go to dark places to get to the light....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: mnehring
I read on another website (so take this with a grain of salt) that an engineer who claims to have worked with this project said they may have hit a high pressure pocket

Well, if you don't install the seals properly, and don't install enough of them, It doesn't matter what the pressure is, unless it is zero.

39 posted on 06/19/2010 11:04:48 AM PDT by UCANSEE2 (The Last Boy Scout)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: allmost

They tried the top kill which was to pump mud down into the hole via the BOP. They couldn’t get enough down hole to stop the flow. They even tried junk shots which is putting items into the system hoping to help clog up the spots where the leaks were.

The next and ongoing attempt is the relief wells which will intersect the bore down near the bottom. They will inject mud from that location and keep increasing the weight of the mud until they reach an equalibrum point. Then they will plug the how with cement. Or that is the current attempted plans at this stage. They have ceased all attempts top side to plug the well.


40 posted on 06/19/2010 11:04:51 AM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson