Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Film on Hitler Sparks Outrage Among Jews in India
ABC News ^ | June 17, 2010 | ABC News

Posted on 06/18/2010 10:14:37 AM PDT by James C. Bennett

MUMBAI (Reuters) - Protests by India's small Jewish community have prompted a leading actor to pull out of a film on the last days of Adolf Hitler , a rare subject for a movie in the Bollywood film industry.

Anupam Kher, who was supposed to play the role of Hitler, told Reuters he had decided to withdraw from the film after an outpouring of messages on social networking sites and protests.

"Considering the ill-will that the project is generating among my fans, I wish to withdraw from it as I respect their sentiments," Kher said in a statement released to Reuters.

"Dear Friend Hitler" aims to give audiences a glimpse into Hitler's "insecurities, his charisma, his paranoia and his sheer genius," according to a statement on the film which will go on floors next month.

"I have never been moved by commercial considerations, but I have always respected social opinions," Kher said.

"Whoever is making this film is doing so with ignorant, if not more sinister motives ... they are hurting the feelings of a community that has suffered a great deal," Jonathan Solomon, the chairman of the Indian Jewish Federation, told Reuters.

In 2006, a small restaurant in Mumbai was forced to change its name from "Hitler's Cross" to "Cross Cafe" after strong protests.

A year later, the Jewish community staged strong protests, again in Mumbai against a home furnishing maker that named its new line of bedspreads "NAZI" and used the swastika in its promotional brochure.

"Those who are protesting against the film have got it wrong," said Rakesh Ranjan Kumar, the director.

(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bollywood; bombay; hitler; kher; mumbai; napl; nazi; pronazi
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

1 posted on 06/18/2010 10:14:37 AM PDT by James C. Bennett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: James C. Bennett
the film aims to give audiences a glimpse into Hitler's "insecurities, his charisma, his paranoia and his sheer genius,"

Yeah he was a genius, he almost took over the entire European continent. That being said, he was still an asshole and needed killin.

2 posted on 06/18/2010 10:18:22 AM PDT by lovecraft (Specialization is for insects.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Anupam Kher

3 posted on 06/18/2010 10:21:20 AM PDT by James C. Bennett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: James C. Bennett
Would this have been a Bollywood dance movie about Hitler?

I'm almost sorry this isn't getting made. Almost.

4 posted on 06/18/2010 10:21:26 AM PDT by agere_contra (Obama did more damage to the Gulf economy in one day than Pemex/Ixtoc did in nine months)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: James C. Bennett
Protests by India's small Jewish community have prompted a leading actor to pull out of a film on the last days of Adolf Hitler

"They lose me right after the bunker scene."

5 posted on 06/18/2010 10:22:06 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: James C. Bennett
Is this the film they're talking about?

Hitler and the vuvuzela at the 2010 Fifa World Cup.

6 posted on 06/18/2010 10:22:08 AM PDT by GOP_Party_Animal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: James C. Bennett
If his face was a little thinner, he could play COL Klink.


7 posted on 06/18/2010 10:27:51 AM PDT by Jonah Hex ("Never underestimate the hungover side of the Force.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: James C. Bennett

Indians and the people of most most colonial states have this love-hate affair with authoritarian leaders because they were led out of colonialism in the post WWII era by such leaders. Be it Jinnah, Nehru or the leaders of Indonesia, Taiwan, Phillipines, Cambodia, Vietnam, Singapore, Malaysia, the Koreas, and even Japan.


8 posted on 06/18/2010 10:32:13 AM PDT by Steelfish (ui)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish; sukhoi-30mki; Cronos

I actually don’t think Gandhi or Nehru had much to do with India’s independence.

Britain was in utter ruin after WW-2, and in no shape to handle its largest overseas territory. Nehru was a subscriber to the Fabian Society movement, from his years as a student in England.

Perhaps Sukhoi-30mki and Cronos can elaborate on all this.


9 posted on 06/18/2010 10:41:30 AM PDT by James C. Bennett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: James C. Bennett

They’ll never top “Downfall”.


10 posted on 06/18/2010 10:46:33 AM PDT by PzLdr ("The Emperor is not as forgiving as I am" - Darth Vader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lovecraft

Hitler was a brilliant con artist like Charles Manson in that he was successfull at getting others to do his dirty work. Hitler and Manson were both brilliant manipulators.


11 posted on 06/18/2010 10:50:22 AM PDT by Gen. Burkhalter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PzLdr

Exactly. Best movie ever made about the final days in the bunker. Bruno Ganz was VERY believable!


12 posted on 06/18/2010 10:51:32 AM PDT by Gen. Burkhalter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: PzLdr

I am one of the few folks that I know who actually saw “Downfall” in the theatres. It is, to date, the ONLY movie about Hitler worth watching. Ganz is incredible, as was the supporting cast.


13 posted on 06/18/2010 10:53:12 AM PDT by Clemenza (Remember our Korean War Veterans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Clemenza

Bttt.


14 posted on 06/18/2010 10:53:25 AM PDT by Clemenza (Remember our Korean War Veterans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Gen. Burkhalter

I have only seen that one scene. Over, and over, and over.

Never fails to get a laugh.


15 posted on 06/18/2010 10:53:32 AM PDT by Vermont Lt (I lived in VT for four years. That was enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Clemenza

I’ve watched it, too.

Undoubtedly, it’s one of the best movies ever made about Hitler.


16 posted on 06/18/2010 10:57:15 AM PDT by James C. Bennett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: James C. Bennett

Regardless of Britain’s status as an economic power, the authoritarian “cult of the individual” had and continues to have a strong pull in the psyche of colonial peoples. Nehru was schooled in British socialism


17 posted on 06/18/2010 10:59:17 AM PDT by Steelfish (ui)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Indira Gandhi would make for a better example of that, although she did get voted out when limits were transgressed.


18 posted on 06/18/2010 11:04:19 AM PDT by James C. Bennett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: James C. Bennett; Steelfish; sukhoi-30mki; Cronos
well, yes and no. No, JCB, you're not completely right or wrong. Gandhi and Nehru had large parts to play in India's independence, but they were not the primary reasons for it. Neither was WWII. The British were masters at the colonial game -- they basically let Indians rule themselves but got paid to let them. The British fought the Sikhs, then got Sikh support agains the Marathas and Mughals, and they were never universally hated (unlike the French in their colonies).

The Brits made the mistake of not making India a dominion in the 1912s-1930s period. If they had, then India would be akin to Canada or Australia

Anyway, I digress. What REALLY convinced the British to leave, what was the final straw, the convincing argument, was the Indian Navy strike of 1946. The British ruled through the Indian Army, Navy, Police Force and Civil Service and in all of these the vast majority were Indians. The Brits KNEW that if the Navy said they would not support the Raj, then the Raj was finished. To the Brits credit, they knew when to leave and left quietly, and not lingering long after they were unwanted (like the French in Vietnam or Algeria or the Dutch in Indonesia).
19 posted on 06/18/2010 11:11:27 AM PDT by Cronos (Origen(200AD)"The Church received from theApostles the tradition of giving Baptism even to infants")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

The cult of the individual isn’t limited to just colonial people (btw, what exactly is a “colonial people” — as technically, every country has been a colony at one point or the other, except Thailand and Japan)


20 posted on 06/18/2010 11:13:35 AM PDT by Cronos (Origen(200AD)"The Church received from theApostles the tradition of giving Baptism even to infants")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson