Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GOP Leader Boehner: Taxpayers Should Pay For This BP Oil Mess
The Business Insider ^ | 6-10-2010

Posted on 06/10/2010 1:19:51 PM PDT by blam

GOP Leader Boehner: Taxpayers Should Pay For This BP Oil Mess

Talking Points Memo
Jun. 10, 2010, 3:26 PM

Image: AP

By Brian Beutler:

Congressional Democrats and the White House are toying with different ways to force BP to cover the costs of damages from the Gulf oil spill. But they face stiff opposition from industry...and it seems leading Republicans. In response to a question from TPMDC, House Minority Leader John Boehner said he believes taxpayers should help pick up the tab for the clean up.

"I think the people responsible in the oil spill--BP and the federal government--should take full responsibility for what's happening there," Boehner said at his weekly press conference this morning.

Boehner's statement followed comments last Friday by US Chamber of Commerce CEO Tom Donohue who said he opposes efforts to stick BP, a member of the Chamber, with the bill. "It is generally not the practice of this country to change the laws after the game," he said. "Everybody is going to contribute to this clean up. We are all going to have to do it. We are going to have to get the money from the government and from the companies and we will figure out a way to do that."

So today I asked Boehner, "Do you agree with Tom Donohue of the Chamber that the government and taxpayers should pitch in to clean up the oil spill?" The shorter answer is yes.

[snip]

(Excerpt) Read more at businessinsider.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bp; gulf; oil; spill
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last
To: blam

The GOP will always find a way to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory!

Nice going Boner.


21 posted on 06/10/2010 1:33:12 PM PDT by brownsfan (The average American: Uninformed, and unconcerned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL; E. Pluribus Unum; Drango; givemELL; DefeatCorruption

He is talking about Obama saying that BP should pay for the Moratorium on Drilling in the Gulf.

Obama wants BP to pay everyone for not being able to work because of his dictates.

This article is a hack job.


22 posted on 06/10/2010 1:33:12 PM PDT by dila813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: blam

The gov’t will have to reach a compromise with BP to cover the costs that exceed the $75MM liability cap. That’s just how it is. Any change in the law, if applied retroactively, would be ex post facto.


23 posted on 06/10/2010 1:34:00 PM PDT by Dayman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

The taxpayer is already commited to bailing out the teachers retirement, Calpers, various state systems, military retirements,,,,,guess what,,,,,,,the goose is plucked!!!!!


24 posted on 06/10/2010 1:34:18 PM PDT by Waco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dila813
He is talking about Obama saying that BP should pay for the Moratorium on Drilling in the Gulf.

When did Zero have time to say that, what with overseeing Major League Baseball and all?

25 posted on 06/10/2010 1:34:49 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("The only stable state is the one in which all men are equal before the law." -- Aristotle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

It went where SS went and all good socks go....


26 posted on 06/10/2010 1:41:14 PM PDT by Irenic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: blam

Who always pays? The U. S. taxpayer. This is not anything new. If BP pays, or if it goes broke, or if drilling is restricted what will happen to gasoline prices? Four, five, six or seven dollars/gallon? Who pays? Guess who? You and me.


27 posted on 06/10/2010 1:43:45 PM PDT by mulligan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
BP's maleficence has done more to weaken capitalism and free enterprise than AIG and Lehman ever approached. The incompetence in the White House is to be expected, BP is not usually thought of as being in the same class. I once read that the larger a corporation becomes, the more like a government bureaucracy it is.

Having supposed conservatives calling for the seizure of BP and the confiscation of all it's assets likely foretells our Marxist future.

28 posted on 06/10/2010 1:45:07 PM PDT by JimSEA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

Reminds me of Mondale’s pledge to raise taxes during his 1984 presidential campaign.


29 posted on 06/10/2010 1:48:51 PM PDT by Sans-Culotte ( Pray for Obama- Psalm 109:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

at the bottom of the article:
“Boehner spokesman Michael Steel emails to say Boehner made a general statement about who
is responsible for the spill, and the federal government oversight was clearly lacking,
but he has said repeatedly that BP is responsible for the cost of the cleanup.”


30 posted on 06/10/2010 1:49:18 PM PDT by Repeal The 17th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
So today I asked Boehner, "Do you agree with Tom Donohue of the Chamber that the government and taxpayers should pitch in to clean up the oil spill?" The shorter answer is yes.

I don't want a freaking "shorter answer is yes" I want a quote. If you are going to write a comment like this you need a quote.

This Business Insider publishes some real BS.

31 posted on 06/10/2010 1:51:01 PM PDT by VeniVidiVici (What's black and white and red all over? - OBAMA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

I’m reluctant to defend Boehner, but that headline is about as deceptive as it gets. The author, Brian Beutler, is a punk liar.


32 posted on 06/10/2010 1:51:50 PM PDT by Gator113 (OBAMA IS NOT SUSTAINABLE.. IMPEACH OBAMA NOW..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dila813

Current law gives oil companies a exceedingly low cap on the cost they must pay for a disaster. Dems are trying to change the law after the fact to for BP to pay for all the damages. I think that is unconstitutional.

Why was there a cap put on the oil company damages in the first place? Probably because they would not do business on US soil w/o that protection from shake downs.

The damages will not be paid by BP even if the dems pass an unconstitutional law to try to force them to pay. BP will win in court. So the Rino is right. The US government is not off the hook if clean up is to happen and damages paid.


33 posted on 06/10/2010 1:52:06 PM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: blam

I rather think environmentalists should pay for it. It was their idea to drill under a mile of water instead of the easier way in shallow water.


34 posted on 06/10/2010 1:54:28 PM PDT by RoadTest (Religion is a substitute for the relationship God wants with you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

I would rather see the stimulus money spent on cleanup than voter fraud in November.


35 posted on 06/10/2010 1:55:01 PM PDT by Carley (For those who fought for it, freedom has a flavor the protected will never know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

UPDATED

Late update: Boehner spokesman Michael Steel emails to say “Boehner made a general statement about who is responsible for the spill, and the federal government oversight was clearly lacking, but he has said repeatedly that BP is responsible for the cost of the cleanup.”


36 posted on 06/10/2010 1:56:16 PM PDT by TLI ( ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

I think that the money for “paying” for cleanup must come from the tarp/stimulus money that is still unspent. Otherwise, No, No, A Thousand Times No!


37 posted on 06/10/2010 1:57:33 PM PDT by sayuncledave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mulligan

If BP goes broke their assets will simply be sold off to whoever purchases them from the sale and nothing will happen to the price of gas, just like other liquidations, assets are sold to pay liabilities.

My preference is for this to happen. I just wait for the day that oil begins to seep in my yard. If we could get a hold of British flags easily I’d probably have a bonfire where we burned the Union Jack and a poster with the BP logo. It wouldn’t accomplish anything but would probably make a lot of people feel better.


38 posted on 06/10/2010 1:58:49 PM PDT by AzaleaCity5691
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

He is probably right, but should really STFU. After all, Obama is in charge (remember)?


39 posted on 06/10/2010 2:07:26 PM PDT by rbg81 (DRAIN THE SWAMP!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SaraJohnson
The damages will not be paid by BP even if the dems pass an unconstitutional law to try to force them to pay. BP will win in court. So the Rino is right. The US government is not off the hook if clean up is to happen and damages paid.

This is one of the few cases where a bit of a strong arm should be applied. Gasoline is a fungible asset, so BP gas is not different than any other gas bought from any other source. If BP doesn't sell in the US, someone else will. So while BP may not be legally obligated to pay for more than the $75 million cleanup, it should be pointed out to them that if they choose to do billions of dollars of damage to US property and then not pay for it then their do business in the US license will be revoked. This is under the theory that while we can't legally make them pay more than the cap, we can legally make darn sure they never get the chance to do it again. So they have to decide if doing business in the US is worth the price of the cleanup.

Note that I'm not advocating taking BP assets, or Government running BP or any other oil company. I don't want the government running gas stations any more than I want them running hospitals or car dealerships. I just don't want the US taxpayer to get stuck with any more of the bill than it has to. BP is paying big stock dividends every year. So they have the money. If they want to play legal games to get out of paying reasonable and substantiated damages make it clear that we can play legal games to shut them out of the US market. We can just buy our oil from Shell, I'm sure they will be happy to sell us all we want.

Of course the hard part would be determining what a "Reasonable and substantiated" claim is. There will be a lot of unreasonable claims being put out by every whack job environmentalist and ambulance chasing lawyer. And those should be dismissed. But certainly the itemized cost of beach cleanup would be a start. All I'm asking for is the pottery barn rule. You break it, you buy it. And if you hide behind a lawyer and refuse to buy it you don't get to come back in the store ever again.
40 posted on 06/10/2010 2:07:49 PM PDT by GonzoGOP (There are millions of paranoid people in the world and they are all out to get me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson