Posted on 06/03/2010 2:49:45 AM PDT by Daisyjane69
ORLANDO, Fla. -- Job hunters are facing a new trend: businesses asking recruitment companies to keep unemployed people out of their job pools.
Peter May, of Atlanta, said he was hoping Orlando-based recruiter "The People Place" would help him find a job with Sony Ericsson. The company is moving its headquarters to Buckhead, which is located outside Atlanta.
May said he was mortified when he read the message on the website. In all caps, and bold type, it said, "No unemployed candidates will be considered at all."
(Excerpt) Read more at clickorlando.com ...
Fair enough...my apologies for taking it personally, when unintended.
That said, it’s a good thing for people to know, who are looking for work. Perhaps volunteering, consulting, and additional school would be wise time investments (with respect to their resume situation). Maybe jobseekers hadn’t thought of those things before.
:)
A couple of points. A recruiting company does not find people jobs. They find the most qualified candidate for their client company, for which the client company pays them a fee, usually between 25% to 35% of the starting annual salary.
Second, having just come from a conference on this, there are a lot of people looking for work, but not necessarily a lot of talent. Therefore employers are screening on any number of things, some of which may be unemployment, degree, what have you been doing since your last full-time gig, etc.
If somone applies to the company I work for, I don't mind that they may be unemployed, I do mind that they have sat on their ass for a year collecting unemployment and in that time did nothing to improve their skills. I'd rather take the unemployed person who went back to school to upgrade their skills.
Good ideas.
Nobody should ever remain unemployed because they feel that available jobs are beneath them. I worked at a tire shop for about $8.00 an hour before I finally got into my chosen career field.
Yep, it’s the hard cold fact, it’s always easier to find a job when you already have one.
Apologies, I should have been more clear.
I was referring to people who should know better, but have been derationated and reduced emotionally to the level of adolescents. Anyone who takes professional or college sports falls under this category—including the well-traveled and well-educated. When the hijinks of strangers playing children’s games become more important that paying attention to reality, there’s a problem.
Disclaimer: The idea of Americans being reduced to a nation of adolescents didn’t originate with me. It’s very easily observed, though.
Also, this sort of social control has been refined in Japan, where men are encouraged to act like infants. It’s the same thing.
Yeah, that’s why I totally put a question mark at the end of that statement.
It’s probably true a lot though. But not in exceptional circumstances such as you cite
Sorry, that should have read “takes...sports...seriously.”
It’s lunch time. Seriously.
The best people I ever hired my entire career were some ex-Apple guys who lost their company after the venture capitalist was scared off by a patent troll shakedown scam. They had been out of work for about six months when I hired them.
The company I retired from fired some of our industries top talent as private equity schemers ran the company into the ground at terminal velocity. In those days head hunters were paying kickbacks to find out who had been fired and was therefore on the market.
Just because you have the right to do something doesn’t mean you have the right not to be criticized for it should other feel it is unreasonable or ridiculous.
Don't I have the right to sometimes find the criticism of others to be ridiculous? I believe I do.
And I do.
HOW'S THAT HOPE AND CHANGE WORKIN' OUT FOR YA?
Yep, you do. And I have the right to criticize you too. :-)
the only thingy that sony has going for it at the moment is their ps3 and blu ray
other than that their tvs and stereo receivers suck
I didn't tell anyone to "shut up". I wrote: Get over it.
It sounds like you need that advice more than most.
What do you propose as an alternative to companies hiring who they want to hire? If you have a better, more conservative way, I'm sure we'd love to hear it.
Disturbing Job Ads: ‘The Unemployed Will Not Be Considered’
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/06/04/disturbing-job-ads-the-un_n_600665.html
that is debatable since they haven’t made a dime on either, their battles with Toshiba and Microsoft have badly bloodied them. The HD battle doesn’t look to have been worth winning and the best they can hope for is to battle Microsoft to a stalemate on the gaming side.
Certainly, but when that places you in the position of defending the ridiculous it reflects poorly. In this case it comes across as a knee-jerk “management is always right” missive rather than a thoughtful statement.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.