Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Sheesh......
1 posted on 06/02/2010 8:06:47 AM PDT by Sub-Driver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
To: Sub-Driver

I would love to see God fry Obama to a smoking crisp right where he stands.


2 posted on 06/02/2010 8:08:01 AM PDT by thethirddegree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

And the b*stard did it the moment he got in, in 2009 too

This is the world we now live in:

THE WHITE HOUSE
Office of the Press Secretary
___________________________________________________________
For Immediate Release June 1, 2009

LESBIAN, GAY, BISEXUAL, AND TRANSGENDER PRIDE MONTH, 2009
- - - - - - -
BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
A PROCLAMATION

http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/Presidential-Proclamation-LGBT-Pride-Month/

Amazing, don’t you think???

And your taxes are paying for the web site too !!!!!!!!!!!


3 posted on 06/02/2010 8:08:35 AM PDT by DontTreadOnMe2009 (So stop treading on me already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver
Obama, in poker parlance, is all in.

He has already decided that one term is it and is going full radical throttle before Congress turns.

5 posted on 06/02/2010 8:10:48 AM PDT by AU72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

Our dear homosexual POTUS does it again.


6 posted on 06/02/2010 8:11:07 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (Support our troops....and vote out the RINOS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

obama is a walking example of “symbolism over substance.”


7 posted on 06/02/2010 8:11:50 AM PDT by FrankR (Standing against tyranny must start somewhere, or the future belongs to the tyrants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

They get a whole freaking month?


8 posted on 06/02/2010 8:12:16 AM PDT by Ballygrl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

"Gotta get that "thspesthial" vote, now"


10 posted on 06/02/2010 8:12:29 AM PDT by Lucky9teen (I'll just say the 2nd amendment to the Constitution is there for a reason!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

Because this is much more important than the oil spill, Korea, the Middle East, employment, the economy, etc...


11 posted on 06/02/2010 8:13:59 AM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four fried chickens and a coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

Notice that the left-wing have no problem in repealing an act of Congress. Hopefully that willingness will backfire on these perverts big time. It is time to support candidates for Congress under the condition that they will support repeal not only of the healthcare bill in full but of all and any of this sick, perverted fascist legislation that the democrats pass.


13 posted on 06/02/2010 8:16:06 AM PDT by TheBigIf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver
If any group has to claim they have "Pride"

They don't have it in the first place.

Like a whore proclaiming her virginity.

14 posted on 06/02/2010 8:16:40 AM PDT by N. Theknow (Kennedys: Can't fly, can't ski, can't drive, can't skipper a boat, but they know what's best.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver
"Health Care Bills Contain HUGE Marriage Penalty (Update) December 9th, 2009 · 2 Comments

UPDATE 12/10/09 at 12:58 p.m. Central: Yes, this is the subject matter mentioned on Rush Limbaugh today.

By Allen Quist, Guest Blogger

There is a huge middle-class marriage penalty hidden in the House and Senate health care bills. The penalty becomes evident by evaluating questions like the following:

■How much would two single people, each making $30,000 per year, pay for private health insurance if the Pelosi bill was in effect now? The answer is $1,320 per year for both individuals combined (based on the premium limits and subsidies outlined on the charts on p. 3). ■But how much would they pay for the same level of insurance under the Pelosi bill if they were to marry? Their combined cost would then be about $12,000 a year (the estimated cost for private insurance).

This extraordinary penalty people will pay, should they marry, extends all the way from a two-person combined income of $58,280 to $86,640, a spread of $28,360. A large number of people fall within this spread. As premiums for private insurance escalate, as expected, the marriage penalty will become substantially larger.

Once the income of Americans exceeds 400% of the Federal Poverty Level, there are no limits on the premiums they can be charged, and their premiums are no longer subsidized. The poverty level is much higher for two people living unmarried as compared to the same two people being married. That is why citizens in many cases will pay far more for insurance if they are married. Why should married people be subjected to financial discrimination?

The Senate bill also creates a marriage penalty, in this case by imposing a new tax on individuals who make $200,000 annually but it also applies to married couples making $250,000 each year. This marriage tax on the affluent, however, is just the tip of the marriage penalty iceberg in the Senate bill.

The Senate bill stipulates that two unmarried people, 52 years of age, with private insurance and a combined income of $60,000, $30,000 each, will pay a combined cost of $2,483 for medical insurance. Should they marry, however, they will pay a combined cost of $11,666 for insurance—a penalty of $9,183 for getting married (based on tables at:"

http://healthreform.kff.org/SubsidyCalculator.aspx).

http://bobmccarty.com/2009/12/09/health-care-bills-contain-huge-marriage-penalty/

They're coming after the married folks to pay for Deathcare. That's where the money is.

15 posted on 06/02/2010 8:18:50 AM PDT by combat_boots (The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spirito Sancto.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

There was a time when June was considered the primary heterosexual wedding month.

SnakeDoc


18 posted on 06/02/2010 8:22:32 AM PDT by SnakeDoctor ("Shut it down" ... 00:00:03 ... 00:00:02 ... 00:00:01 ... 00:00:00.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

HAH! The REAL reason Tipper and Al got divorced. Al wants to celebrate appropriately.


20 posted on 06/02/2010 8:31:58 AM PDT by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

BTTT


21 posted on 06/02/2010 8:33:36 AM PDT by ButThreeLeftsDo (Are You Ready?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver


Obama, Proclaiming LGBT Pride Month, Pushes Repeal of Defense of Marriage Act

Bend over, America.


22 posted on 06/02/2010 8:33:38 AM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

Oil spewing inn the gulf. Koreans sinking destroyers, Israel fighting Palestinians, Military dying in Afghanistan, Our money is nothing but scrap paer and the Kenyan Muslim is worrying about queers and their adoption rights and putting them in the military with real men.


23 posted on 06/02/2010 8:33:41 AM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

I seem to remember Barack Obama proclaiming that he believed marriage should be between a man and a woman. Where did that pledge go to?


24 posted on 06/02/2010 8:36:25 AM PDT by 84rules ( Ooh-Rah! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this first day of June, in the year of our Lord two thousand nine, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-third.

Does he ever worry...

Then I will tell them plainly, 'I never knew you. Away from me, you evildoers!' Matthew 7:23

25 posted on 06/02/2010 8:45:03 AM PDT by throwback ( The object of opening the mind, as of opening the mouth, is to shut it again on something solid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver

I thought that the President said once a law is passed and signed we should just shut up and accept it.


27 posted on 06/02/2010 9:00:16 AM PDT by CSM (Keeper of the "Dave Ramsey Fan" ping list. FReepmail me if you want your beeber stuned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sub-Driver
I love LGB trains!......Oh!...never mind!
29 posted on 06/02/2010 9:44:27 AM PDT by AngelesCrestHighway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson