Posted on 06/02/2010 5:49:47 AM PDT by SJackson
While the international community has, once again, ganged up on Israel, one thing is for certain: the legality of Israel’s actions in stopping the Gaza flotilla is not open to question. What Israel did was entirely consistent with both international and domestic law. In order to understand why Israel acted within its rights, the complex events at sea must be deconstructed:
First, there is the Israeli blockade of Gaza, which included a naval blockade. Recall that when Israel ended its occupation of Gaza, it did not impose a blockade. Indeed it left behind agricultural facilities in the hope that the newly liberated Gaza Strip would become a peaceful and productive area. Instead Hamas seized control over Gaza and engaged in acts of warfare against Israel. These acts of warfare featured anti-personnel rockets, nearly 10,000 of them, directed at Israeli civilians. This was not only an act of warfare, it was a war crime. Israel responded to the rockets by declaring a blockade, the purpose of which was to assure that no rockets, or other material that could be used for making war against Israeli civilians, was permitted into Gaza. Israel allowed humanitarian aid through its checkpoints. Egypt as well participated in the blockade. There was never a humanitarian crisis in Gaza, merely a shortage of certain goods that would end if the rocket attacks ended.
The legality of blockades as a response to acts of war is not subject to serious doubt. When the United States blockaded Cuba during the missile crisis, the State Department issued an opinion declaring the blockade to be lawful. This, despite the fact that Cuba had not engaged in any act of belligerency against the United States. Other nations have similarly enforced naval blockades to assure their own security.
The second issue is whether it is lawful to enforce a legal blockade in international waters. Again, law and practice are clear. If there is no doubt that the offending ships have made a firm determination to break the blockade, then the blockade may be enforced before the offending ships cross the line into domestic waters. Again the United States and other western countries have frequently boarded ships at high sea in order to assure their security.
Third, were those on board the flotilla innocent non-combatants or did they lose that status once they agreed to engage in the military act of breaking the blockade? Let there be no mistake about the purpose of this flotilla. It was decidedly not to provide humanitarian aid to the residents of Gaza, but rather the break the entirely lawful Israeli military blockade. The proof lies in the fact that both Israel and Egypt offered to have all the food, medicine and other humanitarian goods sent to Gaza, if the boats agreed to land in an Israeli or Egyptian port. That humanitarian offer was soundly rejected by the leaders of the flotilla who publicly announced:
“This mission is not about delivering humanitarian supplies, it’s about breaking Israel’s siege on 1.5 million Palestinians.” (AFP May 27, 2010.)
The act of breaking a military siege is itself a military act, and those knowingly participating in such military action put in doubt their status as non-combatants.
It is a close question whether “civilians” who agree too participate in the breaking of a military blockade have become combatants. They are certainly something different than pure, innocent civilians, and perhaps they are also somewhat different from pure armed combatants. They fit uncomfortably onto the continuum of civilianality that has come to characterize asymmetrical warfare.
Finally, we come to the issue of the right of self defense engaged in by Israeli soldiers who were attacked by activists on the boat. There can be little doubt that the moment any person on the boat picked up a weapon and began to attack Israeli soldiers boarding the vessel, they lost their status as innocent civilians. Even if that were not the case, under ordinary civilian rules of self defense, every Israeli soldier had the right to protect himself and his colleagues from attack by knife and pipe wielding assailants. Less there be any doubt that Israeli soldiers were under attack, simply view the accompanying video and watch, as so-called peaceful “activists” repeatedly pummel Israeli soldiers with metal rods. (http://www.youtube.com/user/idfnadesk) Every individual has the right to repel such attacks by the use of lethal force, especially when the soldiers were so outnumbered on the deck of the ship. Recall that Israel’s rules of engagement required its soldiers to fire only paintballs unless their lives were in danger. Would any country in the world deny its soldiers the right of self defense under comparable circumstances?
Notwithstanding the legality of Israel’s actions, the international community has, as usual, denounced the Jewish state. In doing so, Israel’s critics have failed to pinpoint precisely what Israel did that allegedly violates international law. Some have wrongly focused on the blockade itself. Others have erroneously pointed to the location of the boarding in international waters. Most have simply pointed to the deaths of so-called peace activists, though these deaths appear to be the result of lawful acts of self-defense. None of these factors alone warrant condemnation, but the end result surely deserves scrutiny by Israeli policy makers. There can be little doubt that the mission was a failure, as judged by its results. It is important, however, to distinguish between faulty policies on the one hand, and alleged violations of international law on the other hand. Only the latter would warrant international intervention, and the case has simply not been made that Israel violated international law.
GO GET ‘EM, DERSH!..................
this man is an enigma.
or he has he turned around.
I still bet he voted for zer0bambam.
If you’d like to be on or off, please FR mail me.
..................
He hasn’t turned around but I like his attitude toward dealing with terrorists.
Correct.
Hamas threatens Israel with extermination.
Palestinians hate Jews (the feeling is mutual)
Iran threatens Israel with annihilation.
Israel has few friends in the region. Jordan, Egypt (off and on but could change on a whim) etc.
Israel takes its security seriously and does not apologize nor needs to in order to take all the necessary steps to ensure that security.
Again,
Dear Israel,
I would say to draw a “line” in the water (coordinatres, lat/long) and ANY vessel that crosses it will be sunk.
No exceptions. No matter who’s aboard.
It’s life or death.
They cannot be permitted to replenish their rockets and fire on your people. Yours or theirs. That’s the choice.
BUT....theirs have fair warning NOT to cross the line.
bttt
IF so, please ping me to it; freepers keep harping that Israel broke the law, that Israel is engaging in piracy, blah/blah, etc.
Thanks!
How is what Israel doing any different from what the US Coast Guard does every day? If the boats do not heave to and permit inspection. The Coasties open fire.
Some comfort from Psalm 110 for the year 2010shalom b'SHEM Yah'shua HaMashiachPsa 110:6 He (Yah'shua) will judge among the nations,
He will fill them with corpses,
He will shatter the chief men over a broad country.
When is the Dersh going to attack the one person that is enabling the rest of the world leaders to easily attack one of our most important allies? The Jews faith in liberals is going to go up in radioactive smoke before most of them get it.
There's nothing enigmatic about him. He's merely confused, misled or willfully ignorant...Just like any other person who supports Israel and votes democrat.
Every word true.
But golly, I really hate to find myself on the same side as AD. What an ass otherwise.
He’s good on Israel, though, which just shows there’s a lot of truth in the saying about it depending on whose ox is gored.
too bad he, and other liberals, especially Jewish one, can’t take the lessons they should learn from this type of situation and apply them to the rest of their world-view.
I feel better already.
Hell, all of the Arabs hate the Palestinians...they are the trailer-trash of the Middle East. Look at what King Hussien of Jordan did to them.
Alan Dershowitz is, first and foremost, an observant Jew. He is a fervent supporter of the state of Israel, placing her survival above all else. While very socially liberal, he considers himself a seeker of truth. I believe him to be one who will be enlightened in the end times and receive The Lord’s salvation, having finally found Truth.
Until that day he remains a liberal to be pitied.
Nice work, Alan. I look forward to an equally thorough and even-handed assessment of whether Sestak’s job offer was legal.
When Staunch Liberals like Alan Dershowitz, Ed Koch, and Elie Weizel start seeing the Holocaust Redux in motion again, their eyes are slowly but surely opening to the Truth.
Unfortunately, these gentlemen are elderly and weak, and probably don’t carry much weight with the “Liberal Community” anymore.
Their new idols are unabashed marxists, islamofascists, and Antisemites
It's quite extraordinary that only few seem to have any idea that both Israel & Egypt have had a Gaza blockade for a long time now, and that it is ENTIRELY LEGAL for Israel to board & inspect ships who intend to break the blockade.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.