Skip to comments.
Bill would ban carrying unloaded guns publicly(CA)
signonsandiego.com ^
| 2 June, 2010
| Michael Gardner
Posted on 06/02/2010 4:59:08 AM PDT by marktwain
SACRAMENTO Assembly Democrats on Tuesday pushed through a fiercely contested gun-control measure that would ban Californians from carrying unloaded weapons in public.
The open carry measure, which passed without a vote to spare, 41-25, now goes to the Senate, where its fate is uncertain. Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger has yet to take a position.
With rights come responsibilities, said Assemblywoman Lori Saldaña, D-San Diego, who is the author of Assembly Bill 1934. Carrying a gun simply because you can is not responsible ownership.
The measure failed to attract support from Republicans, who argued that it was tantamount to an attack on law-abiding citizens, it would violate Second Amendment rights to gun possession, and that there have never been any criminal problems associated with open-carry advocates.
This is a backhanded, even acute way, of implementing gun control, said Assemblyman Jim Nielsen, R-Biggs. I assure you that criminals dont worry about this. They have the guns, and they know how to conceal them, how to use them.
(Excerpt) Read more at signonsandiego.com ...
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: ban; banglist; ca; democrats; guncontrol; liberalfascism; opencarry; shallnotbeinfringed
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-75 next last
While Arizona moves toward freedom and protection of the border, California moves toward elimination of Constitutional rights.
1
posted on
06/02/2010 4:59:08 AM PDT
by
marktwain
To: marktwain
Looks like California wants people to only open-carry loaded weapons, then...
2
posted on
06/02/2010 5:01:38 AM PDT
by
gogogodzilla
(Live free or die!)
To: marktwain
Welcome to CA, where your rights disappear nearly as quickly as your money.
3
posted on
06/02/2010 5:01:46 AM PDT
by
tgusa
(Investment plan: blued steel, brass, lead, copper)
To: marktwain
So, no open carry, and damned few ccw’s. I assume locked container carry. I wonder if there are exemptions for hunting, plinking?
4
posted on
06/02/2010 5:02:49 AM PDT
by
umgud
(Obama is a failed experiment.)
To: marktwain
"The open carry measure, which passed without a vote to spare, 41-25, now goes to the Senate"
Can someone explain this sentence to me? It barely passed but it had a 16 vote margin. How is that passing without a vote to spare???
To: gogogodzilla
"Looks like California wants people to only open-carry loaded weapons, then..."
I think that's already illegal in Cali. It's a may issue state which means that unless you're connected you don't get a conceal carry permit so the only way normal citizens can carry is open carry and unloaded...
To: marktwain
there just pipes without ammo.
Load those weapons, LaLa Landers!
7
posted on
06/02/2010 5:04:52 AM PDT
by
Vaquero
(Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
To: marktwain
Of what use is it to carry an unloaded gun?
8
posted on
06/02/2010 5:05:45 AM PDT
by
andy58-in-nh
(America does not need to be organized: it needs to be liberated.)
To: Vaquero
oooops
thats They’re not there....
9
posted on
06/02/2010 5:06:41 AM PDT
by
Vaquero
(Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
To: andy58-in-nh
"Of what use is it to carry an unloaded gun?"
It was explained to me one time that if you're carrying an unloaded pistol you can carry loaded magazines in your pocket.
I guess if there's a situation that arises you'll probably have to await commands from the line officer. With a magazine and five rounds, load. All ready on the right, all ready on the left. The line is ready. You may commence firing once your target appears.
To: andy58-in-nh
Of what use is it to carry an unloaded gun?It's called a paperweight.
11
posted on
06/02/2010 5:10:25 AM PDT
by
Puppage
(You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
To: marktwain
Why walk around with an unloaded gun? Sounds like a stupid idea to me.
To: marktwain
With rights come responsibilities, said Assemblywoman Lori Saldaña, D-San Diego, who is the author of Assembly Bill 1934. Carrying a gun simply because you can is not responsible ownership. Is Lori in charge of the "thought-police?" Is she the judge and jury on what constitutes "responsible ownership?" Or is Lori just another politician with a disordered mind? Her vision of utopia is a world without guns. Of course she wants to take away guns from law abiding citizens because that is far easier than taking them away from criminals. Then she and her ilk will "feel better" about themselves for trying.
13
posted on
06/02/2010 5:14:42 AM PDT
by
olezip
To: andy58-in-nh
In the land of fruits and nuts, nothing makes sense, particularly when it’s run by democrats.
14
posted on
06/02/2010 5:15:03 AM PDT
by
izzatzo
To: marktwain
Why don’t you Californians just give up and split up? Your State is lost forever.
LLS
To: marktwain
No one could pay me enough to move to California.....
16
posted on
06/02/2010 5:23:36 AM PDT
by
GenXteacher
(He that hath no stomach for this fight, let him depart!)
To: Old Teufel Hunden
Exactly - for as we all know, real life threat conditions approximate those on the target range. /s
17
posted on
06/02/2010 5:49:08 AM PDT
by
andy58-in-nh
(America does not need to be organized: it needs to be liberated.)
To: andy58-in-nh
"Exactly - for as we all know, real life threat conditions approximate those on the target range. /s"
I joke with my Dad sometimes out on the range that if someone ever breaks in, he'll have to call out. Hold on for a second, wait until I get my shooting glasses on and adjust my Merit eye aperture. It's dark let me adjust my laser sights. How far away are you?
To: GenXteacher
"No one could pay me enough to move to California....."
True, but it is a good vacation spot...
To: marktwain
Carrying owning a gun simply because you can is not responsible ownership.Coming next
20
posted on
06/02/2010 6:37:38 AM PDT
by
paul51
(11 September 2001 - Never forget)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-75 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson