Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

While Arizona moves toward freedom and protection of the border, California moves toward elimination of Constitutional rights.
1 posted on 06/02/2010 4:59:08 AM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: marktwain

Looks like California wants people to only open-carry loaded weapons, then...


2 posted on 06/02/2010 5:01:38 AM PDT by gogogodzilla (Live free or die!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain

Welcome to CA, where your rights disappear nearly as quickly as your money.


3 posted on 06/02/2010 5:01:46 AM PDT by tgusa (Investment plan: blued steel, brass, lead, copper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain

So, no open carry, and damned few ccw’s. I assume locked container carry. I wonder if there are exemptions for hunting, plinking?


4 posted on 06/02/2010 5:02:49 AM PDT by umgud (Obama is a failed experiment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain
"The “open carry” measure, which passed without a vote to spare, 41-25, now goes to the Senate"

Can someone explain this sentence to me? It barely passed but it had a 16 vote margin. How is that passing without a vote to spare???
5 posted on 06/02/2010 5:02:53 AM PDT by Old Teufel Hunden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain

there just pipes without ammo.

Load those weapons, LaLa Landers!


7 posted on 06/02/2010 5:04:52 AM PDT by Vaquero (Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain

Of what use is it to carry an unloaded gun?


8 posted on 06/02/2010 5:05:45 AM PDT by andy58-in-nh (America does not need to be organized: it needs to be liberated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain

Why walk around with an unloaded gun? Sounds like a stupid idea to me.


12 posted on 06/02/2010 5:14:05 AM PDT by fire4effect
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain
“With rights come responsibilities,” said Assemblywoman Lori Saldaña, D-San Diego, who is the author of Assembly Bill 1934. “Carrying a gun simply because you can is not responsible ownership.”

Is Lori in charge of the "thought-police?" Is she the judge and jury on what constitutes "responsible ownership?" Or is Lori just another politician with a disordered mind? Her vision of utopia is a world without guns. Of course she wants to take away guns from law abiding citizens because that is far easier than taking them away from criminals. Then she and her ilk will "feel better" about themselves for trying.

13 posted on 06/02/2010 5:14:42 AM PDT by olezip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain

Why don’t you Californians just give up and split up? Your State is lost forever.

LLS


15 posted on 06/02/2010 5:20:08 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer ( WOLVERINES!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain

No one could pay me enough to move to California.....


16 posted on 06/02/2010 5:23:36 AM PDT by GenXteacher (He that hath no stomach for this fight, let him depart!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain
Carrying owning a gun simply because you can is not responsible ownership.”

Coming next

20 posted on 06/02/2010 6:37:38 AM PDT by paul51 (11 September 2001 - Never forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain
This is what happens when you allow tyrants to run your life.

If you can't vote them out and the Courts are sympathetic to their cause, then more extreme measures may be necessary.

21 posted on 06/02/2010 6:41:36 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (III, Alarm and Muster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain
“With rights come responsibilities,” said Assemblywoman Lori Saldaña, D-San Diego, who is the author of Assembly Bill 1934. “Carrying a gun simply because you can is not responsible ownership.”

She has quite a warped understanding of the definition of freedom. But would she agree that “speaking an opinion simply because you can is not responsible citizenship”?

23 posted on 06/02/2010 6:51:31 AM PDT by Niteranger68 (Boycott PA 12!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain
“Carrying a gun simply because you can is not responsible ownership.”

Locking a gun up in a safe that requires a key, a four digit combination lock with at least one hundred million possible combinations, and the biometrics from two people to start a timer to open the door is responsible ownership. As for the "shall not be infringed" suggestion in the obsolete Constitution, that's not what today's leaders would have written for today's situation, and it's not what other nations' laws say, so it has no legal force.

What makes those republicans think that having a right to keep and bear arms means that they are actually permitted to do so? Working people who carry firearms for self-defense are nothing like armed Black Panthers intimidating voters in Philadelphia, so Dems aren't going to ignore their weapons.

35 posted on 06/02/2010 8:10:17 AM PDT by Pollster1 (Natural born citizen of the USA, with the birth certificate to prove it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain; John Semmens
“With rights come responsibilities,” said Assemblywoman Lori Saldaña, D-San Diego, who is the author of Assembly Bill 1934. “Carrying a gun simply because you can is not responsible ownership.”

This looks exactly like something John Semmens would write, but sadly, this isn't satire.

She actually put into words what they all think.

38 posted on 06/02/2010 8:17:13 AM PDT by wastedyears (The Founders revolted for less.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain
ban Californians from carrying unloaded weapons in public.

This is good. Carrying an unloaded gun is about as useful as carrying a rock.

41 posted on 06/02/2010 8:30:31 AM PDT by SouthTexas (Congress is out of order!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain
“With rights come responsibilities,” said Assemblywoman Lori Saldaña, D-San Diego, who is the author of Assembly Bill 1934. “Carrying a gun simply because you can is not responsible ownership.”

So by that line of reasoning, we should make flag burning illegal too? Freedom of speech is a right, is it not? In California, the legislature can make the constitutional "right" of free speech illegal?!! Because by their reasoning the speaker spoke in an irresponsible manner?

Whiskey Tango Foxtrot, Oscar... Elected representatives should take civics 101.

59 posted on 06/02/2010 9:38:13 AM PDT by Toadman (((Conservative First. Molon Labe.)))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain

They want it to be illegal to walk around with unloaded hunks of metal. Guess knives are next.


60 posted on 06/02/2010 9:52:17 AM PDT by lainie (The US congress is full to the brim of absolutely disgusting thieves who deserve humiliating ouster.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain

I live in Yuba City an hour north of Sacramento.

Yesterday at the sandwich shop, somebody came in open carrying a semi-auto. Didn’t look like a cop, but who knows.

Today at the Mexican restaurant, two plain clothes cops in wearing dress shirts and ties but no jackets, came in open carrying firearms.

Man, I just love seeing people carrying firearms in the wild!


69 posted on 06/02/2010 6:20:20 PM PDT by Freedom_Is_Not_Free (Liberal are like termites eating away our cultural foundations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson