Posted on 05/18/2010 12:03:09 PM PDT by Fight4Freedom1
The Washington Post: Two months after a Muslim soldier complained to the Pentagon about being harassed in the wake of the Fort Hood shootings, Spec. Zachari Klawonn said the Army has not followed through on its promises to address problems at the country's largest military base.
See Video Here:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PrxQDEoZoj4&feature=player_embedded
first off PC is destroying this nation and our military
2nd, this guy is supposed to be a fighter not a sissy cryer so he needs to go as others like him do .
3rd,it is muslims killing us so STFU.
4th kick any one of these idiots out, we’re fighting a war against radical islam and the sooner they get this the better just like we have immigration laws and the sooner the illegals get told this the better
fed up of not choosing the best person for the job because PC says we should have a woman, a black a muslim, , an arab, a Jew, a hispanic.
Also fed up of the left crying all the time whether it is muslims, homosexuals, soft asses,
It’s the military for crying out loud not a group to be experimented on
Garde la Foi, mes amis! Nous nous sommes les sauveurs de la République! Maintenant et Toujours!
(Keep the Faith, my friends! We are the saviors of the Republic! Now and Forever!)
LonePalm, le Républicain du verre cassé (The Broken Glass Republican)
Why not?
Nadil Hasan, the Christmas underpants bomber, and the Times Square bomber all are followers of the same radical Imam.
A bunch of "lone nuts" with common threads.
would that be radical islam, those words this admin cannot say
as directed by the head Muslim
Kick all muslims out of the military!!!
To my knowledge, this is the first time they've aligned themselves with a Muslim, but I could be wrong. In any event, they have proven themselves to be an ENORMOUS pain in the ass. I'm sure this case will be no different.
Either he is lying his A** off or his eye blinking is some kind of code!
Why is he still wearing the uniform? He sounds like a potential jihadist.
Mikey weinstien...anti-christain puke...
Bingo. There is no right to serve in our Armed Forces. The islamic “faith” should be a disqualifier.
Reading ain't your long suit, eh n00b?
You nailed the problem, but could have said a bit more. No muslim can honestly pledge to “preserve, protect, and defend” the US Constitution. [Wording has changed, but I like the original form.] This means that no muslims should be allowed in the US military — or in any positions in any of our governments! [State, County, Municipal as well as Federal.] If not all govs require the same oath, they should.
Some here might be tempted to write this soldier off as a whiner; some kind of ACLU plant waging jihad via the courts, and — in truth — there’s a possibility that that is what’s going on, here. But I think there’s a far larger elephant in the room that his immediate complaint. I think it is a perspective that real Conservatives should have ZERO problem embracing, and it is this:
HAD the Army done what they SHOULD have done in reading the warning signs, and taken appropriate, preemptive action to “handle” the perpetrator, the shootings at Ft. Hood would NEVER have occurred. And had the shootings never occurred, there would not now exist the level of mistrust of Muslims in the Army that now exists, and there would not be the resultant elevated incidence of expressions of said mistrust that are the focus of the lawsuit now brought by Mr. Klawonn.
Not only was the Army’s handling of Maj. Hasan an ABJECT FAILURE, but that failure had the exact OPPOSITE effect as was intended. U.S. Army toleration and inaction in the face of Hasan’s known expressions of anti-American sentiment and hoped-for violence, not only did NOT ease tensions between Muslims and non-Muslims, not only did NOT succeed in calming anti-American sentiment by demonstrating how magnanimous we are, but actually AMPLIFIED those tensions by allowing a nascent problem to grow to full size; allowing traitorous words to grow into traitorous acts. There ought to be a public hanging over this whole mess, quite frankly, and Hasan ought not swing by himself.
If the Army — or any organization, actually — truly intends to make life better for Muslims both in and beyond the ranks of those who serve, then taking a hard line against people like Maj. Hasan is THE single prescriptive of greatest possible positive effect. There can be no better way to engender confidence and camaraderie in our armed forces than for the chain of command to, at every level, PROVE to every boot on the ground that Muslims serving alongside them are true-hearted American patriots by systematically vetting EVERYONE, and exposing, and weeding out any and all who cannot express clear-eyed love for this country, and articulate that they are serving because they want to strengthen this nation.
That systematic effort could begin as simply as requiring an answer to one, single, solitary question, “Will you, here and now, categorically denounce Hamas, Hezbollah, and other similar terrorist groups operating throughout the globe?” ALL who hesitate in delivering the requested response should be THROWN OUT ON THEIR EAR before their next heartbeat.
If it takes a Muslim in the Army suing the Army to get them to kick their own ass about this self-destructive failure, then I’m good with that; I think the action is necessary, and I wish Mr. Klawonn the greatest success in his effort. Yeah, it may not actually do any good, but I sure won’t oppose him trying.
Could never stand that show, but thanks anyway. :)
I think you misunderstood what this is about....????
I’d like to sue the government for NOT harassing muslims in the military. I.e., PC in the military was partly responsible for the massacre of our fine troops. Btw, haven’t heard anything about Hasan or his whereabouts lately. Has anyone else?
Most likely a branch of the ACLU.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.