Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US satellites shadow China's submarines
Asia Times ^ | May 13, 2010

Posted on 05/13/2010 9:44:54 AM PDT by george76

The People's Liberation Army's Navy (PLAN) submarines cannot spot United States satellites high overhead as the submarines leave their bases at Sanya on Hainan Island, Qingdao in Shandong province and Ningbo in Zhejiang province, and head for deeper water.

Plenty of very deep water can be found in the South China Sea, especially in the zone north of the Spratly Islands, east of the Paracels, and south of the Luzon Strait.

"A more challenging area for submarines to operate undetected is the East China Sea, which is quite shallow from the Chinese coastline up to the Okinawa Trough ...

Detecting submarines via satellite is a form of Non-Acoustic Anti-Submarine Warfare (NAASW). Lasers, infrared and other detectors and synthetic aperture radar (SAR) in space may be used as part of this NAASW activity. Satellites might see subtle undersea disturbances caused by submarines, watch wave patterns on or beneath the sea surface, or detect subtle variations in ocean temperature.

Over the next 18 months, the US National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) - operator of the US spy satellite fleet - is planning multiple satellite launches, and China must assume that one or more of these new US surveillance satellites will help support US Navy efforts to locate and track PLAN submarines.

A US Navy oceanographer from Australia, Paul Scully-Power, who became the first oceanographer in space, flew on the space shuttle Challenger (STS - 41G) in 1984. The US Navy later admitted that the mission had successfully detected the undersea or internal waves generated by a submarine which had been tracked successfully at relatively shallow depths. This was deemed, "incredibly important to us" and was reported by the Washington Post in 1985 - quoting a senior US Navy admiral at the time.

(Excerpt) Read more at atimes.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: china; eastchinasea; navy; satellites; submarines; us; usnavy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

1 posted on 05/13/2010 9:44:54 AM PDT by george76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: george76
Not something that we (The public) need to know.
This should be SECRET if not TOP SECRET.
2 posted on 05/13/2010 9:50:53 AM PDT by DeaconRed (I have had all I can stands and I can't stands NO MO--Call me Popeye)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!; American_Centurion; An.American.Expatriate; ASA.Ranger; ASA Vet; Ax; Azeem; ...

MI Ping


3 posted on 05/13/2010 9:53:44 AM PDT by ASA Vet (Natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. De Vattel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Voter#537

Next thing ya know, Obama will tell the world how many nukes we have ... oh wait


4 posted on 05/13/2010 9:53:55 AM PDT by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Voter#537
This should be SECRET if not TOP SECRET

What is not being told are the weapons that can target these boats, and at the very least, we can obliterate Hianan island and give them no home to go to. The diesel-electric boats will limp around on batteries waiting to be destroyed and their noisy nuke boats will be tracked down and eliminated by the silent-as-death Virginia-class hunter-killer boats.

5 posted on 05/13/2010 10:15:32 AM PDT by Tonytitan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tonytitan

I’m convinced the X-37 “space plane” was developed to deploy and retrieve kinetic energy weapons launch platforms. Last I heard, the first X-37 is still up there, with another coming online soon. Obozo doesn’t think we need a lot of nukes anymore, he may be correct.


6 posted on 05/13/2010 10:21:27 AM PDT by east1234 (It's the borders stupid! My new environmentalist inspired tagline: cut, kill, dig and drill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: east1234
Obozo doesn’t think we need a lot of nukes anymore, he may be correct.

Please understand that when Iran brings it's nuclear weapons online, we had better have a nuclear deterent. Otherwise we're toast.

And if you don't understand how gentle of a response that was, please take my word for it.

7 posted on 05/13/2010 10:31:20 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (Excusaholic: MeCain lost to Jr., RINO endorsements are flying, & you live at 2012 Denial Blvd.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
And if you don't understand how gentle of a response that was, please take my word for it.

Nicely put.

8 posted on 05/13/2010 10:34:44 AM PDT by null and void (We are now in day 476 of our national holiday from reality. - 0bama really isn't one of US.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: george76

Gee,
Do you suppose one of them was in the Gulf of Mexico on April 20th?

Of course, we’ll never hear about it.


9 posted on 05/13/2010 10:42:11 AM PDT by Dick Bachert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tonytitan
We will fight china one day... we will have no choice... I hope our next President readies us.

LLS

10 posted on 05/13/2010 10:44:10 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer ( WOLVERINES!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: east1234

No, he is not correct and we invite disaster by thinking that he is.

LLS


11 posted on 05/13/2010 10:46:41 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer ( WOLVERINES!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: east1234
I’m convinced the X-37 “space plane” was developed to deploy and retrieve kinetic energy weapons launch platforms.

Rods from the gods. Such happy thoughts. The only legitimate reason to draw down our nuclear arsenal, since Orbital KE weapons can do the job better, cheaper, and with less radiation to clean up afterwords. Too bad Obama would never use them.
12 posted on 05/13/2010 10:56:26 AM PDT by GonzoGOP (There are millions of paranoid people in the world and they are all out to get me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

You read something into my statement. I never said we didn’t need a nuclear deterent, I’m only saying that this system, if it exists, will decrease our dependence on a nuclear deterent. Similar destructive force without all the nasty radiation and the international outrage that will follow a nuke strike. We can use it for strikes that would have previously required nukes to be successful.


13 posted on 05/13/2010 10:58:29 AM PDT by east1234 (It's the borders stupid! My new environmentalist inspired tagline: cut, kill, dig and drill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: east1234
Obozo doesn’t think we need a lot of nukes anymore, he may be correct.

IMO, reducing the size of our nuclear arsenal sends the wrong message. It makes it clear we are willing to downsize our military. And we are. We have China, Russia, soon to be Iran, most of the Islamic world against us, and Obama wants to reduce our nuclear arsenal to the bare bones. There are still other nations that have nukes today, that might in some instances also wind up being nuclear threats.

While I did miss the "...a lot of..." part of your comment, and that does alter my perception of your post, it still leads me to disagree with your take on this matter.

Thanks for the response.

14 posted on 05/13/2010 11:17:51 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (Excusaholic: MeCain lost to Jr., RINO endorsements are flying, & you live at 2012 Denial Blvd.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: george76

Well, wait until Obama hears about this. He’ll put a stop to it.


15 posted on 05/13/2010 11:19:40 AM PDT by CodeToad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: east1234
Obozo doesn’t think we need a lot of nukes anymore, he may be correct.

They take too long to reach the target unless the mission is to kill 100,000 women and children, also known as "market share".

Given that the "holy grail" of Global Command/Global Strike is to have steel-on-target inside of single-digit minutes, the pre-positioned/orbital kinetic weapon is the way to go.

16 posted on 05/13/2010 11:23:56 AM PDT by Tonytitan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: george76

Attempting to track subs by satelite is not new. While I have no idea how effective they are, there are many things which they try to monitor via Satelite (distortion of Earth’s magnetic field, Hydrogen release, radiation streaming, etc.).


17 posted on 05/13/2010 11:38:25 AM PDT by ScubieNuc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tonytitan
It’s a monumental step forward, if we have it. It doesn’t antiquate nukes, but it can, in theory utterly destroy a target within a few minutes of launch. ICBM’s take 20-30 minutes. For the record I don’t think we should cut back from the 5000 some warheads we have, yet. As for some little pissant country like Iran, we can take out every detectable target, no matter how deeply they bury it. We can take out every detectable boomer in the seas. Missile silos are toast. All without radiation.
18 posted on 05/13/2010 12:13:38 PM PDT by east1234 (It's the borders stupid! My new environmentalist inspired tagline: cut, kill, dig and drill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: george76

Who’d thunk that would be able to do that?


19 posted on 05/13/2010 1:08:11 PM PDT by NY Attitude (Make love not war but be prepared for either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dick Bachert

It was an NK long-range mini sub. You gotta stay current. ;-)


20 posted on 05/13/2010 2:39:16 PM PDT by verity (Obama Lies - Obongo must go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson