Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: east1234
Obozo doesn’t think we need a lot of nukes anymore, he may be correct.

Please understand that when Iran brings it's nuclear weapons online, we had better have a nuclear deterent. Otherwise we're toast.

And if you don't understand how gentle of a response that was, please take my word for it.

7 posted on 05/13/2010 10:31:20 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (Excusaholic: MeCain lost to Jr., RINO endorsements are flying, & you live at 2012 Denial Blvd.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: DoughtyOne
And if you don't understand how gentle of a response that was, please take my word for it.

Nicely put.

8 posted on 05/13/2010 10:34:44 AM PDT by null and void (We are now in day 476 of our national holiday from reality. - 0bama really isn't one of US.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: DoughtyOne

You read something into my statement. I never said we didn’t need a nuclear deterent, I’m only saying that this system, if it exists, will decrease our dependence on a nuclear deterent. Similar destructive force without all the nasty radiation and the international outrage that will follow a nuke strike. We can use it for strikes that would have previously required nukes to be successful.


13 posted on 05/13/2010 10:58:29 AM PDT by east1234 (It's the borders stupid! My new environmentalist inspired tagline: cut, kill, dig and drill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson