To: east1234
Obozo doesnt think we need a lot of nukes anymore, he may be correct. Please understand that when Iran brings it's nuclear weapons online, we had better have a nuclear deterent. Otherwise we're toast.
And if you don't understand how gentle of a response that was, please take my word for it.
7 posted on
05/13/2010 10:31:20 AM PDT by
DoughtyOne
(Excusaholic: MeCain lost to Jr., RINO endorsements are flying, & you live at 2012 Denial Blvd.)
To: DoughtyOne
And if you don't understand how gentle of a response that was, please take my word for it. Nicely put.
8 posted on
05/13/2010 10:34:44 AM PDT by
null and void
(We are now in day 476 of our national holiday from reality. - 0bama really isn't one of US.)
To: DoughtyOne
You read something into my statement. I never said we didn’t need a nuclear deterent, I’m only saying that this system, if it exists, will decrease our dependence on a nuclear deterent. Similar destructive force without all the nasty radiation and the international outrage that will follow a nuke strike. We can use it for strikes that would have previously required nukes to be successful.
13 posted on
05/13/2010 10:58:29 AM PDT by
east1234
(It's the borders stupid! My new environmentalist inspired tagline: cut, kill, dig and drill)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson