Posted on 05/12/2010 4:31:35 AM PDT by Desperado67
On Monday, Barack Obama officially nominated Elena Kagan to become the nations newest Supreme Court justice. Kagan would replace retiring Justice John Paul Stevens. The confirmation hearings for Kagan are likely to being sometime this summer.
Supposedly not much is known about Kagans viewpoints on various issues. That is because she has never served a single day as a judge, but somehow Obama felt that she was qualified for a lifetime position amongst the highest-ranking judges in the country.
(Excerpt) Read more at examiner.com ...
She isn’t qualified EITHER.
Keep saying this is a trick...and she'll withdraw and we'll see an "as left as you can get".
http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/65600
She should be denied ... but then, there are these pubics ...
Welcome to America under the rule of sleeper agents and fifth columnists.
Kinda figures, doesn't it. After all, who would write a bio about themselves at age 37, especially when you haven't done a damn thing, and follow that book up with spending a gazillion dollars to make sure no one can see any of your past records, be they college transcripts, medical records, or anything else. The man's a sham and so are the people who work around him...
So far, the best her supporters can muster is, “she’s very bright, and has an egaging personality”. Why does this sound like the setup for a bad blind date? The problem with it is that this blind date starts with a wedding chappel.
Rush Limbaugh and Barbara Streisand haven't been judges either. Their viewpoints ARE known on various issues. Having and expressing opinions has more to do with being alive than it does with having been a judge.
ML/NJ
I know that I will sleep easier now that will be TWO man-hating deisel dyke lesbos on the Supreme Court.
Starting to sound more and more like the libs have found another angry radical whose abrasive loudness and controversy (oooh, she’s a lesbian!) are wrongly admired as “intelligence”
Listened to an excerpt of the tape of her arguing before the Court and being smacked down by Roberts and Kennedy- and recognized that she is well spoken but stupid. All hat, no cattle.
Kagan has neither of those qualifications.
If you wish to judge her qualifications from her articles, she has written a grand total of FOUR.
A candidate with no track record, no Judicial Opinions and no Judicial experience. Seems to me we're once again being told to just trust Obama, something I'm incapable of doing.
We can hope that when this country finally wakes up to the truth about our Usurper In Chief and kick him out, all his appointments, orders, etc., will be kicked out as well.
As a law professor at the University of Chicago and Harvard, she should have published a substantial number of legal articles and, possibly, some books. Such publication is usually a prerequisite to obtaining tenure. Did she ever get tenure? What, if any, were her publications? If she doesn’t have a significant paper trail of scholarship, such as Robert Bork’s massive trail, then it looks like she’s a political hack who advanced though skilled string pulling and AA for lesbians, not any real scholarship. That would make her the most unqualified nominee since Harriet Meyers.
No man has ever withdrawn from her.
You will have to report to the special train.
a Rising Star without a Record?
Are we talking about a SCOTUS nominee or an American Idol finalist here?
Good point!
Even more puzzling to me is who the hell would BUY it? Maybe Soros bought a few hundred thousand of them and had them shipped directly to a land-fill.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.