Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Holder: Feds may sue over Arizona immigration law
CNN ^ | 5/09/10

Posted on 05/09/2010 5:43:22 PM PDT by Libloather

Holder: Feds may sue over Arizona immigration law
By the CNN Wire Staff
May 9, 2010 2:06 p.m. EDT

Washington (CNN) -- Attorney General Eric Holder said Sunday that the Justice Department was considering a federal lawsuit against Arizona's new immigration law.

"We are considering all of our options. One possibility is filing a lawsuit," Holder told NBC's "Meet the Press." Possible grounds for the lawsuit would be whether the Arizona law could lead to civil rights violations, he said.

The recently enacted Arizona law initially allowed police to ask anyone for proof of legal U.S. residency, based solely on a police officer's suspicion that the person might be in the country illegally. Arizona lawmakers soon amended the law so that officers could check a person's status only if the person had been stopped or arrested for another reason.

Critics say the law will lead to racial profiling, while supporters say it involves no racial profiling and is needed to crack down on increasing crime involving illegal immigrants.

In Arizona, the city councils of Tucson and Flagstaff have decided to challenge the new immigration law in court.

Holder told ABC's "This Week" program that one concern about the Arizona law is that "you'll end up in a situation where people are racially profiled, and that could lead to a wedge drawn between certain communities and law enforcement, which leads to the problem of people in those communities not willing to interact with people in law enforcement, not willing to share information, not willing to be witnesses where law enforcement needs them."

(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: amnesty; arizona; deptofinjustice; holder; immigration; law; squattersupportsquad
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last
To: cripplecreek

I really don’t think the Feds want this in court. This could change how immigration is handled nationwide.

Arizona bases their law specifically on the Federal law
Feds sue, saying the law leads to some civil rights violation

If the Feds lose, Arizona gets their way and the Feds look like incompetent boobs (but I repeat myself).

If the Feds win though....doesn’t that mean the current Federal immigration law would be surpassed in our system of precedent? I’m not a lawyer but it seems to me that would be a pretty bad outcome.


61 posted on 05/09/2010 6:57:25 PM PDT by Personal Responsibility (I'd use the /s tag but is it really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek; mojitojoe; hennie pennie; george76; F15Eagle; MestaMachine

Thats right. The Obama Junta has a shadow cadre within the FBI. Made up of Muslim Symptahizers and intercultuarl political correctness mavins who are committed t following political correctness instead of the law.<p.

Thats fascism.

Problem is that the Hutaree judge follows law, not political correctness. Next time the FBI Obama Shadow cadre will find a judge that follows political corectness instead of law.

The more this happens, the closer to civil disorder we will get. Civil dosorder is what Obama wants....desperately.

WE MUST TAKE AWAY HIS POWER IN CONGRESS IN NOVEMBER,or our nation will descend in an eventual blood bath.


62 posted on 05/09/2010 6:59:10 PM PDT by Candor7 (Now's the time to ante up against the Obama Facist Junta (Member NRA))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

“Should be an interesting fight. The feds suing to prevent a state from doing a job the feds are supposed to do but aren’t.”

And the taxpayers paying for both side. Again.


63 posted on 05/09/2010 7:00:37 PM PDT by AuntB (Illegal immigration is simply more "share the wealth" socialism and a CRIME not a race!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Brewer ought to countersue Obama for not enforcing the federal law.


64 posted on 05/09/2010 7:02:02 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

This is a suit that won’t happen unless the Feds have some inside dope they think guarantees they will win. Losing would be worse than leaving it alone.


65 posted on 05/09/2010 7:02:17 PM PDT by arthurus ("If you don't believe in shooting abortionists, don't shoot an abortionist." -Ann C.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
I had a cop pull a gun on me once because he was looking for someone who apparently looked like me and was known to frequent the area I was in.

He was probably justified in doing that, given that you matched a suspect's description. Glad it didn't go too far.

In the case where I was nearly killed, there had been an early morning robbery where the perp used a car that was the same color as mine. That, and the fact that the perp was a black male were the full extent of the profile.

66 posted on 05/09/2010 7:04:35 PM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Eric Holder is pond scum. I have more respect for Janet Reno.


67 posted on 05/09/2010 7:07:45 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Obamunism: You have two cows. The regime redistributes them and shoots you dead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rogertarp
He needs to sue himself.

I may suggest another activity that he can direct towards himself...

68 posted on 05/09/2010 7:11:51 PM PDT by meyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
Always view the United States of America (particularly the Arizona situation) from a distance and circumspectly as akin to a "foreign country" and analyze it "externally" just as you would any other country and its difficulties.

I see many paralells:

"Main articles: History of Kosovo and 20th century history of Kosovo Kosovo's current status is the result of the turmoil of the disintegration of Yugoslavia, particularly the Kosovo War of 1998 to 1999, but it is suffused with issues dating back to the rise of nationalism in the Balkans during the last part of Ottoman rule in the 19th century, Albanian nationalism (centred around the claim that Kosovo was historically theirs due to alleged connections with the Illyrians) vs. Serbian nationalism (notably surrounding the Battle of Kosovo eponymous with the Kosovo region) in particular. "

69 posted on 05/09/2010 7:11:59 PM PDT by AmericanInTokyo (ARIZONA 2010 is historic. It is the Alamo, it is THE BATTLE between US Sovereignty and Reconquista.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Hmmm... maybe AZ could use the eligibility issue as a defense here???

Watch how fast they drop charges!


70 posted on 05/09/2010 7:17:13 PM PDT by Safrguns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Holder is Arabic for camel dung. As in, don’t step in the holder.


71 posted on 05/09/2010 7:17:15 PM PDT by Drango (A liberal's compassion is limited only by the size of someone else's wallet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Holder’s fulla krap. He’s been in Arizona for over a year trying to prove up civil rights violations and hasn’t found one spit...

His bully tactics are pathetic posturing, and yes he would waste the taxpayer dollars with a frivilous lawsuit...he has no conscious doing it at all.


72 posted on 05/09/2010 7:30:46 PM PDT by RowdyFFC (The opinion of a wise Welshtino woman...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ann Archy
No Holder,WE SUE YOU and your ilk that are ruining our country knowingly and wantonly.All your transgressions,past and present.Keep on sticking your stick in our face and you will see what happens.Vote people vote!Come on November.
73 posted on 05/09/2010 7:38:49 PM PDT by shanover (These are the times that try men's souls....tyranny, like hell, is not easily conquered-T. Paine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

THe Democrats always claim to be in favor of “real democracy,” whatever that is.

From stories like this, it certainly doesn’t include any actual democracy.


74 posted on 05/09/2010 7:43:16 PM PDT by denydenydeny (The welfare state turns us all into zoo animals, mouths open, waiting for the next feeding.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

I think the Az law, the critical part of it, is cut-and-paste from the Federal law. So if Holder wins, the logical extension of that is that the Fed law does not stand either.

This is, to Holder, the goal, I think. Worth the expense, from 0bama’s point of view.


75 posted on 05/09/2010 7:43:38 PM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

I wonder if we can sue Holder for failing to do his duty and protect America’s borders? ALso, since he is a black reparationist, he should recuse himself from anything that involved Afro-Americans, white Americans (the potential payees), or sane people.


76 posted on 05/09/2010 7:45:31 PM PDT by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JewishRighter
Maybe I'm politically naive, but I'm starting to think that this AZ law was a brilliant move by the Republicans (yeah, I know, "brilliant" and "Republican" should rarely be used in the same sentence). The Dems are in a box on this one - sue (or sue and overturn), and you galvanize those that oppose illegal immigration just in time for the November elections. But do nothing, and you anger a sizable enough portion of your base that that it could be a double whammy in November.
77 posted on 05/09/2010 7:57:36 PM PDT by Major Matt Mason (ClimateScandal.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
So Holder and "his" justice department plan to sue AZ... when tax paying citizens are thrown to the dogs with no recourse.

This Justice department (and O's executive branch) is not doing its job.

Who do we get to sue without having the Constitution's "commerce clause" thrown back in our faces?

78 posted on 05/09/2010 8:09:33 PM PDT by Trajan88 (www.bullittclub.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
The recently enacted Arizona law initially allowed police to ask anyone for proof of legal U.S. residency, based solely on a police officer's suspicion that the person might be in the country illegally.

And, in other "Breaking News"..., the DOJ will prohibit ICE from enforcing longstanding legal requirements that aliens carry immigration documents since that is "discriminatory" as well!

79 posted on 05/09/2010 8:42:05 PM PDT by ExSES (the "bottom-line")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Arizona is just enforcing the laws the Feds would not enforce...


80 posted on 05/09/2010 9:24:36 PM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson