Posted on 04/20/2010 8:02:29 PM PDT by Smokeyblue
The defense attorney for an officer refusing Army orders until Barack Obama documents his eligibility to be commander in chief has hinted that the president's proof of eligibility could come up during the course of the government's prosecution of his client.
"In the UCMJ (Uniform Code of Military Justice), just as you would expect, criminal defendants have the process of the court, for subpoenas and depositions under the rules that are prescribed," attorney Paul Jensen said during an interview today on the radio show of G. Gordon Liddy.
Jensen was on the program with his client, Lt. Col. Terry Lakin, who posted a YouTube video inviting his own court-martial because he believes military orders under an ineligible president are illegal, and then posted a letter telling Obama that it's up to him to provide the proof.
"I'm not going to say what we are going to do other than we are going to do what you would want us to do," Jensen said.
He specifically avoided broadcasting any specific defense strategy for the case that is developing against Lakin – confirming that the officer was told in writing on Monday that he now has been "flagged" by the military and charges are expected to be filed soon.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
ping for later
Agreed. She posted the ad and had a BC done in absentia for the kid. The bigger problem for O is that adoption by Soetoro.
Weaver appeared to be on the ballot everywhere but Louisiana.
Weird. I’m glad this fusion experiment didn’t continue. ;d
“The colonel will not be seeing those documents.”
***
If that’s the way it goes, it will be a miscarriage of justice.
Miscarriage of justice, legal definition. n. “The unjust and inappropriate outcome of a court proceeding.”
That is consistent with how the usurper is abusing his power, ignoring the Constitution, and proceeding in bad faith, both in the carrying out his duties, and also by not disclosing in good faith, any of his authentic records and documents.
Disclosure of the truth by our government to the people it theoretically governs, has suffered the same fate as 50 million babies have since Roe v. Wade.
The European-style socialism is NOT the goal. We could live with that. No the goals goes far more to the east = Marxism as was in USSR and China!!!
You better lay down your bong!!!
I am afraid so. We are socialists already. We work to support the government. http://tinyurl.com/y4yp73m
The woman @ MIT was let go when her credentials or lack thereof were exposed, remember? She had been running the place.
I remember reading on one of the many threads re BO’s bc that, even though the adoption by Soetoro went hand in hand with Indonesian citizenship, that by itself is does not nullify natural born status. The explanation was that a minor cannot be held responsible for what a parent does with the minor’s citizenship as the minor has no legal ability to prevent it.
Where the problem may lie, however, is what Barry did about that citizenship once he reached the legal age of majority. If he did not renounce it and affirm U.S. citizenship, that would be a problem that would disqualify him from being a legal president.
Obama is not natural born because potentially:
1. His reputed father was a British citizen.
2. His mother was not old enough to confer citizenship upon her son (she needed to have 14 continuous years U.S. residency).
3. He was not born on U.S. soil - most likely Mombosa.
4. He was an Indonesian citizen after he reached adulthood.
#4 on the list would be more important if it were revealed and proved that BO’s real father was indeed a U.S. citizen and BO was born in Hawaii. The “proved” part being either real or a good enough forgery to do the job. (a DNA test could even be faked by providing another person’s sample). Countering #4 with fraud and forgery would be difficult as Barry’s stint at Occidental as a foreign student would also have to be explained away satisfactorily and I don’t know how that could be done. No doubt they will come up with something, though, if the necessity ever arises.
I have come to believe that it is important to use all of the reasons for ineligibility in any proceeding against him. If, for instance, one concentrated on the theme of his father being a British citizen (easiest point) and the case got to SCOTUS (”natural born citizen” definition) and BO proves his father was Malcolm X, that would be so powerful that the other points would fall by the wayside and never get addressed. And BO would get a second term. Nightmare!
And the stockholders could still get rid of both the CEO and the board.
It might even be a simple as the fact that the BC was changed to show the adoption, or the father is shown as unknown, or his grandfather is the father and the mother is some unknown black, or any number of things.
At this point, the likelihood that he is a living fraud (for whatever reason) is the biggest issue, no matter how significant or insignificant the original issue.
A little Latin, some pictures, underlining, and bold text - it all boils down to nothing.
I don’t think an analogy of private business is applicable to a government situation. However, your posting begs the question Is this more than just involving an individual’s(i.e. BHO) eligibility, in that the election procedural actions were fraudulent because all information required by the Constitution for eligibility was not given to the public and/or closed , even perhaps intentionally so? Is there a Constitutional remedy for such a case? To me it just shows how untrusworthy and unscrupulous people can be when it comes to government.
Interestingly, that you should describe yourself here, you just fill in on that template as a copy-cat, very PERFECTLY!!!
I haven’t seen where a pregnant women wouldn’t fly to Kenya. However, If mama needed a man for a legitimate father but the man ,real daddy or not, was already married and Hawahii would not accept a biggamist as daddy, then mama and daddy fly to Kenya which does not prevent a biggamist for marriage to give baby a legitimate father.
I haven’t seen where a pregnant women wouldn’t fly to Kenya. However, If mama needed a man for a legitimate father but the man ,real daddy or not, was already married and Hawahii would not accept a biggamist as daddy, then mama and daddy fly to Kenya which does not prevent a biggamist for marriage to give baby a legitimate father.
I haven’t seen where a pregnant women wouldn’t fly to Kenya. However, If mama needed a man for a legitimate father but the man ,real daddy or not, was already married and Hawahii would not accept a biggamist as daddy, then mama and daddy fly to Kenya which does not prevent a biggamist for marriage to give baby a legitimate father.
|
>>> A little Latin, some pictures, underlining, and bold text - it all boils down to nothing. LOL, another Politijabberwocky ... I'm sorry if the html coding, Latin and graphics confuse you. Here ... I'll ... even ... type ... this ... really ... slowly ... for ... you ... Lucy. Why is Obama worthy of ANYONE'S TRUST in this country? |
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.