Skip to comments.
Federal judge rules Day of Prayer unconstitutional
AP via SFGate ^
| 4/15/10
Posted on 04/15/2010 1:01:15 PM PDT by SmithL
Madison, Wis. (AP) -- A federal judge in Wisconsin says the National Day of Prayer is unconstitutional.
U.S. District Judge Barbara Crabb issued the ruling Thursday in a lawsuit filed by the Madison-based Freedom From Religion Foundation.
(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...
TOPICS: Breaking News; Front Page News; Government; US: Wisconsin
KEYWORDS: activistjudge; atheismandstate; barackhusseinobama; barbaracrabb; bhoprayer; freedomfromreligion; freedomofreligion; immoralabsolutes; jimmycarter; judicialtyranny; moralabsolutes; obama; sicsempertyranis; wisconsin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-127 next last
To: SmithL
OH ... MadiSTAN!! Never mind.
21
posted on
04/15/2010 1:13:13 PM PDT
by
gwilhelm56
(Obama ... Mein Kampf is NOT a Textbook!!)
To: SmithL
Liberal white females - the source of most problems.
22
posted on
04/15/2010 1:13:23 PM PDT
by
Clock King
(There's no way to fix D.C.)
To: MrB
23
posted on
04/15/2010 1:14:02 PM PDT
by
mojitojoe
(“Our leaders seek to pit us against one another, and torment us relentlessly."Mark Levin)
To: SmithL
Obama has got to like this. He has dodged a political bullet. Now he can say that the judiciary has prevented him from doing the Day of Prayer (even though 0 did not want to anyway).
24
posted on
04/15/2010 1:14:34 PM PDT
by
Thunder90
(Fighting for truth and the American way... http://citizensfortruthandtheamericanway.blogspot.com/)
To: JoSixChip
Yes and yes and I wouldn’t be surprised to see the 4th go.... From acquaintances, I’m aware that there are many people in powerful positions who frown upon recognizing milestones in a nation’s history. It’s a Globalist thing.
25
posted on
04/15/2010 1:15:26 PM PDT
by
Nickname
(2012 - Yes You're Canned!)
To: SmithL
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
Did this Federal Judge got to Law School, has she ever read the US Constitution? There is no requirement to pray, nor is there any direction as to what religion you must follow.
26
posted on
04/15/2010 1:16:11 PM PDT
by
Hodar
(Who needs laws .... when this "feels" so right?)
To: SmithL
I find this amusing. Jews, Catholics, Mormons, and others, were excluded as per Mrs. focus-on-the-family which I thought was unconstitutional but there was nothing I could do about it. Like I said, I find this amusing.
27
posted on
04/15/2010 1:19:02 PM PDT
by
Saundra Duffy
(For victory & freedom!!!)
To: SmithL
Its freedom OF religion, not freedom FROM religion
28
posted on
04/15/2010 1:19:10 PM PDT
by
driftdiver
(I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
To: MrB
Lets just form two countries and get it over with... Frankly I'm beginning to think that's the only solution. The political schism in this country seems irreconcilable.
29
posted on
04/15/2010 1:19:41 PM PDT
by
ScottinVA
(RIP to the country I love...)
To: SmithL
Nominated by Jimmy Carter on July 21, 1979...Whodda thunk it? /s
30
posted on
04/15/2010 1:19:42 PM PDT
by
Road Warrior ‘04
(I miss President Bush greatly! Palin in 2012! 2012 - The End Of An Error! (Oathkeeper))
To: SmithL
I never went to law school, nor took an online course, but even I can figure out that a “national day of prayer” is nowhere near the ballpark of establishing a state religion.
How is it these people are ever taken seriously?
To: ScottinVA
Oh anything is reconcilable. Through natural extension of politics through other means. Per Von Clausewitz.
32
posted on
04/15/2010 1:24:31 PM PDT
by
farlander
(Sic Semper Tyrannis)
To: mojitojoe
As Prof Williams said -
should we continue to attempt to force our worldview on each other through the government,
or should we just peaceably part company.
They don’t want responsibility “forced” on them,
we don’t want collectivism force on us.
Let’s separate, divide the country at the state level,
let people freely emigrate,
and call it amicable.
33
posted on
04/15/2010 1:25:46 PM PDT
by
MrB
(The difference between a humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
To: SmithL
How about the in-school “Day of Silence” if you tell them you are going to use it to pray for sinners?
34
posted on
04/15/2010 1:27:59 PM PDT
by
a fool in paradise
(VP Biden on Obamacare's passage: "This is a big f-ing deal". grumpygresh: "Repeal the f-ing deal")
To: jiminycricket000
35
posted on
04/15/2010 1:29:25 PM PDT
by
pillut48
("Stand now. Stand together. Stand for what is right."-Gov.Sarah Palin, "Going Rogue")
To: jiminycricket000
Whom were we giving Thanks to on Thanksgiving Day, after all, if not the God of the Christians? Thank you FDR for Social Security checks.
Thank you LBJ for Medicare checks.
Thank you OHB for Socialized medicine.
Thank you Karl Marx, leader of us all for showing us the error of our ways.
36
posted on
04/15/2010 1:30:58 PM PDT
by
a fool in paradise
(VP Biden on Obamacare's passage: "This is a big f-ing deal". grumpygresh: "Repeal the f-ing deal")
To: MrB
We need to seriously consider doing that. This country is pretty evenly divided. We just need to have Northern America and Southern America. The south keeps the military. The north keeps the Dept. of Peace.
To: SmithL
Jimmy Carter appointee. I'm afraid there are a ton of judges sitting at their benches out there who wouldn't know what the Constitution was if it bit them on the *ss.
38
posted on
04/15/2010 1:31:22 PM PDT
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: Cicero
What is THAT?
My pattern recognition circuitry is shorting out.
39
posted on
04/15/2010 1:34:24 PM PDT
by
MrB
(The difference between a humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
To: SmithL
In a small way, I can kind of see her point:
Government involvement in prayer is constitutional only as long as it does not call for religious action, which the prayer day does, U.S. District Judge Barbara Crabb wrote in her ruling.
"It goes beyond mere 'acknowledgment' of religion because its sole purpose is to encourage all citizens to engage in prayer, an inherently religious exercise that serves no secular function in this context," Crabb wrote. "In this instance, the government has taken sides on a matter that must be left to individual conscience."
But then again...
"It is unfortunate that this court failed to understand that a day set aside for prayer for the country represents a time-honored tradition that embraces the First Amendment, not violates it," ACLJ Chief Counsel Jay Sekulow said in a statement.
40
posted on
04/15/2010 1:34:53 PM PDT
by
Lucky9teen
(I'll just say the 2nd amendment to the Constitution is there for a reason!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-127 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson