Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

You Have the Right to Remain Silent (LT Colonel Lakin Read His Rights)
Safe Guard Our Constitution ^

Posted on 04/13/2010 8:19:14 AM PDT by Man50D

Washington, D.C., April 13, 2010. Army doctor Lt. Col. Terrence Lakin yesterday met with his brigade commander, Col. Gordon R. Roberts, who proceeded to read LTC Lakin his Miranda rights, and who informed LTC Lakin he had the “right to remain silent” because LTC Lakin is about to be charged with serious crimes. Col. Roberts was at age 19 awarded the Congressional Medal of Honor, the only recipient of the nation’s highest honor currently on active duty in the Army.

LTC Lakin had previously been ordered in writing to report yesterday to Ft. Campbell, KY and then on to deploy for his second tour of duty in Afghanistan. Lakin refused to obey these orders and instead came to work yesterday morning at the Pentagon. Late yesterday afternoon he was confronted by his brigade commander.

Before the meeting was over, LTC Lakin’s Pentagon Access Pass had been revoked, and his laptop computer was set to be confiscated.

The message to LTC Lakin is clear; through official channels, he was informed yesterday that he will shortly be court-martialled for crimes (specifically, missing movement and conduct unbecoming an officer) that for others has led to lengthy imprisonment at hard labor.

Lakin has announced in a YouTube video that has now been viewed more than 110,000 times that he considers it his duty to refuse to obey orders that would be illegal if President Obama is ineligible to hold office.

Meanwhile, cries mount for proof of that eligibility, but nothing has been forthcoming. The Obama campaign at one point released a copy of computer-generated abstract of information purportedly in Hawaii's records system, but the source of this information is unclear and need not have been a birth certificate issued contemporaneously and signed by the doctor who attended the birth. Even the document released was only a copy, and the version printed in the Los Angeles Times on June 16, 2008 is on a form only in use since late 2001. Even as it is, the document contains a warning that it is merely “prima facie”--threshold, rebuttable and thus inconclusive --evidence of birth, and the copy the Times printed mysteriously has the certificate number blacked out, thereby rendering the document unusable according to language on the bottom.

Given the seriousness of the offenses with which LTC Lakin is about to be charged, the American Patriot Foundation today renewed its plea for donations to its legal defense fund for LTC Lakin. Details are available at APF's website, www.safeguardourconstitution.com


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; US: Hawaii
KEYWORDS: army; birthcertificate; birthers; certifigate; lakin; military; naturalborncitizen; obama; terrencelakin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 1,241-1,248 next last
To: LachlanMinnesota

“Are we a banana republic? “

Apparently you want to make us one, where the military decides who is President...and a Lt Col in the military, at that!

If Aunt Sadie ran for President in 50 states, was allowed on the ballot in all 50, won the vote, was certified by Congress - then yes, Aunt Sadie could order him to deploy!

It isn’t the role of the military to decide who can run or be elected. There are officials in all 50 states who are responsible, and the voters, and the Electoral College, and Congress - and they have ALL come down on the side of Obama being eligible.


81 posted on 04/13/2010 9:26:28 AM PDT by Mr Rogers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers
Too bad. This case will NOT force Obama to release anything. He has released a birth certificate. The officials of 50 states, Congress and the Supreme Court are satisfied. No military court, nor federal court reviewing it later, will consider it within their authority to overrule the decisions made in 2007/2008 by the states, the people, the Congress and the Supreme Court.

More like you hope it. You really are full of it. And successful suits have been brought against the military for wrongful dismissal.

He has released a birth certificate.

Sure he has... he gave a .jpg image to the DailyKooks at the DailyKos that was put on the Web. The damn thing is highly likely a forgery.

82 posted on 04/13/2010 9:27:40 AM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: MrB

“They can just rule that until the president proves he is eligible as CiC, his orders can be questioned.”

Obama proved it [past tense] to the satisfaction of everyone with responsibility - all 50 states, the voters, the Electoral College, and Congress.

He doesn’t have to prove it to each and every individual in the military.


83 posted on 04/13/2010 9:28:19 AM PDT by Mr Rogers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers
The Constitution hasn’t imposed Lakin as dictator, free to overrule the election of 2008, or Congress, or the Supreme Court. He has no case. None.

You are silly. Lakin is just asking for proof for Obama to prove who the lame stream media says he is. You buy that media tripe don't you?

84 posted on 04/13/2010 9:29:58 AM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

Prayers Up for LTC Lakin.


85 posted on 04/13/2010 9:30:33 AM PDT by greeneyes (Moderation in defense of your country is NO virtue. Let Freedom Ring.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

If you have PROOF that he forged a birth certificate, provide it. Then Congress could impeach him and remove him from office.

Until then, you are pissing in the wind.

Obama’s eligibility has been ruled on. You don’t like it. So what? You aren’t the King. Neither you nor Lakin can remove Obama by Internet accusations. Proof is needed.

Oh, but wait. You can’t provide proof, but you want Obama removed anyways. Won’t happen.


86 posted on 04/13/2010 9:32:06 AM PDT by Mr Rogers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers
So, since the Reichstag sanctioned Hitler, and all of Hitler's orders had to be followed, why did we put some of those Nazi's to death for following them?

As long as the color of truth is present, all orders are therefore unchallengeable, if they come from higher authority, right?

Besides, it is not the miliitary deciding this issue, it is the courts. So, if Bush and Cheney told the troops to torture by, say, pounding bamboo shoots under the fingernails of the prisoners, it would be a legal order because they were duly elected?

Now Obama can order anything and it is legal because the election was deemed to be valid?

Wow. We better hope for nothing but saints in the regal chair.

We are a nation of laws, the chief of which is the Constitution. However, we have placed statutory law above constitutional law, but never loading anyone to challenge such a simple concept. In fact, if we do, we will be jailed.

87 posted on 04/13/2010 9:33:18 AM PDT by LachlanMinnesota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers
It ought to give you pause to know that there is not a single member of Congress or any court anywhere that believes you have a case. Not one.

YOU HAVE NO proof of that! If you feel the NEED to exaggerate, shows how little you believe it - you are just hoping others will believe your wild claims.

$upport the Constitution by supporting Lakin!
88 posted on 04/13/2010 9:34:03 AM PDT by presently no screen name ( Repeal ZeroCare!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Para-Ord.45
"If he is court marshaled ..." lol
89 posted on 04/13/2010 9:34:10 AM PDT by verity (Obama Lies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Obama provided proof to the satisfaction of all 50 states, the Republican Party, John McCain, Sarah Palin, the people of the USA, the Electoral College, Congress and the Supreme Court.

At what point do you deal with the fact that he doesn’t have to prove anything to you or Lakin?


90 posted on 04/13/2010 9:34:23 AM PDT by Mr Rogers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

Good post!


91 posted on 04/13/2010 9:34:27 AM PDT by Las Vegas Ron ("Because without America, there is no free world" - Canada Free Press - MSM, where are you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers
No federal court is going to decide the military court had any business overturning the election of 2008.

But it's ok to violate the US Constitution? No one is asking them to. I didn't see anywhere in the US Constitution that says elections trump it. The courts can find the idiot in chief as ineligible. Obama can play Captain Dunsel for a while.

92 posted on 04/13/2010 9:34:43 AM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: LachlanMinnesota
I have a rhetorical questions for you. Under your logic, you are saying that no officer in the U.S. armed forces can currently give a lawful order because you don't believe Obama is a U.S. citizen?

How can our military function if no one can give a lawful order?

Are we a Banana Republic? Yes, if the military now have the power to decide to refuse the Commander in Chief's orders because they doubt his eligibility for office solely on their own authority.

George Washington would be turning in his grave if he knew this country had overturned the Constitution's bedrock principle that the civilian government controls the military, and not vice versa.

93 posted on 04/13/2010 9:34:58 AM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: LachlanMinnesota; Mr Rogers
but there is no way to tell if they are legal without a challenge procedure.

And therein lies the key to the Nuremburg defense that birthers like to tout as precedent.

There is no way for our military to know if Obama is in fact ineligible or that any orders issued by him through his appointed officers are illegal.

However, the Nazi soldiers had a moral obligation to humanity to refuse their orders because those orders were clearly crimes against humanity. There is no gray, only black and white, when it comes to following an order to march millions of Jews into gas chambers. There is no comparison between these two situations.

Now, if Obama were to order a nuclear attack on Iran, North Korea, Russia, China, wherever, you might have a case.

94 posted on 04/13/2010 9:36:26 AM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (Integrity, Honesty, Character, & Loyalty still matter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: presently no screen name

“YOU HAVE NO proof of that!”

Ok. Name the member of Congress who believes Obama was born in Kenya. We have folks in Congress who believe Guam may overturn, and who believe GWB planted bombs in the World Trade towers...name ONE who has stated Obama was not born in the USA.

Or, name the court that has found that Obama is ineligible for office. One.


95 posted on 04/13/2010 9:36:56 AM PDT by Mr Rogers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: roaddog727

Under what provision of the UCMJ?


96 posted on 04/13/2010 9:38:18 AM PDT by verity (Obama Lies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: colorado tanker

If there is no valid commander in chief, then there is no right to issue an order to anyone.

The gravity of the situation does not affect the logic of the situation.

It does speak to the reticence of so many in this country to address the issue by requiring the proof of NBC status, which would be so easy to prove.

My rhetorical question to you: If the original birth ciertificate did get released somehow, and it showed lack of NBC status, would you follow his orders? Would you wait for a court decree stating that he is not a NBC?

If no one has standing, and the courts will not rule, will you follow his orders to war?


97 posted on 04/13/2010 9:38:58 AM PDT by LachlanMinnesota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

Every official with any role in certifying eligibility or the election has already ruled Obama eligible.

Now you want a military court to overturn them, and decide the election was invalid?

THAT is banana republic time!


98 posted on 04/13/2010 9:39:10 AM PDT by Mr Rogers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: LachlanMinnesota

“If no one has standing”

The folks with standing have ALREADY ruled him eligible. It is done. Over. Get on with beating democrats in the next election. Donate to conservative candidates, not an idiot LTC!


99 posted on 04/13/2010 9:40:45 AM PDT by Mr Rogers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: colorado tanker
Commander in Chief's orders because they doubt his eligibility for office solely on their own authority.,

His eligibility was NEVER proven - so doubt IS the next step. Being sworn in is NOT proof - it's a formality assuming there was proof.
100 posted on 04/13/2010 9:41:10 AM PDT by presently no screen name ( Repeal ZeroCare!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 1,241-1,248 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson