Skip to comments.
President Obama Needs to Prove His Constitutional Eligibility to Be Commander-in-Chief
American Thinker ^
| April 08, 2010
| Terrence Lakin, MD
Posted on 04/07/2010 10:49:55 PM PDT by neverdem
Last week, I entered Walter Reed Army Hospital to notify the Department of Defense that I would refuse to obey any orders from my commanding officers -- including President Obama -- until the president produces his original birth certificate. After nearly eighteen years of wearing the military uniform of the country I have proudly served, including overseas assignments in imminent danger/combat areas in Bosnia and Afghanistan, I felt compelled to take this step.
I made this decision from much deliberation, after lengthy consultations with many friends, family members, and colleagues, and I firmly believe that all servicemen and women, and the American public, have the right to know the truth about President Obama's constitutional eligibility to serve as Commander-in-Chief.
As military officers, we all take a solemn oath upon commissioning into the Uniformed Services. In this oath, we swear to support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic. Upholding the law is an essential part of our role as citizens; in the military, we are the ultimate protectors of that law. The Constitution is our social compact, which safeguards all of us and ensures the "equal rights" that we are entitled to as American citizens.
Since Nuremberg, My Lai, and even Abu Ghraib more recently, the military has been taught the hard lessons of following illegal orders. Any reasonable person looking critically at the information and evidence currently in the public domain about Obama's birthplace would have questions about President Obama's claim to be a natural born citizen. I made the decision to disobey all military orders, including my deployment order to Afghanistan, in pursuit of the truth of whether President Obama can legally occupy the high post that he holds today and which entitles him to send servicemembers into harm's way.
The United States serves an example to the rest of the world of a stable, civilized, democratic government, where all men are equal under the law and the rule of law is cherished and obeyed. The U.S. military teaches and promotes the rule of law and civilian control of the military to many other nations and military forces around the world. Every soldier learns what constitutes a lawful order and is encouraged to stand up and object to unlawful orders. This is called the "duty to disobey."
My deployment orders for a second tour in Afghanistan included a requirement to bring copies of my birth certificate. I would be glad to obey this order and provide a certified copy of my original birth certificate with common, standard identifiers, including the name of an attending physician and a hospital. Every day in transactions across the country, American citizens are required to prove their identity; standards for identification have become stricter since the terrorist attacks of 9/11.
Since fall 2008, I have been troubled by reports that the president's original birth certificate remains concealed from public view along with other records which, if released, would quickly end questions surrounding his place of birth and "natural born" status. Many people mistook the online Certification of Live Birth for an original birth certificate. Until the summer of 2009, the Hawaiian Department of Homelands would not accept this Certification of Live Birth to determine native Hawaiian identity -- the Department insisted upon also reviewing an original birth certificate.
Many do not understand that the online document was from 2007, generated by computer, laser-printed, and merely a certification that there is something on file which may or may not be sufficient proof of a birth in Hawaii. An original birth certificate could be the underlying document that presumably includes a hospital and attending physician's or midwife's name. Such a document should lay to rest the "natural born" dispute. This controversy was further escalated by media reports that gave two different hospital names for Obama's birthplace -- even today, the public does not know what doctor delivered the then-future president or which hospital was the site of his birth. No eyewitnesses have stepped forward to affirm that he was born in Hawaii in 1961. Under immigration laws in force at the time, if born in Kenya to a father who was not a U.S. citizen, Barack Obama had no right to American citizenship of any kind, and he could never qualify as "natural born." This is why determining his actual birthplace is crucial.
In 2008, after pressure from news media, President Obama's rival, candidate McCain, produced an original birth certificate from the Panama Canal Zone; a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing examined and affirmed his "natural born" status and constitutional eligibility to serve as president. The U.S. Senate was strangely silent about President Obama's eligibility despite statements from Kenyan citizens that he was born there, evidently including his paternal grandmother and the Ambassador from Kenya to the U.S. during a November 2008 radio interview. Hawaiian state officials claim that they cannot release an original birth certificate without Obama's consent, declaring that the public has no "tangible interest" in seeing this vital birth record.
I attempted without success through my chain of command for over a year to get answers to the questions surrounding the president's eligibility. I was told that I have no standing to make this inquiry, and moreover, that no one in DoD could answer this question. I made inquiries, unsuccessfully, through my congressional delegation, which simply referred my questions back to DoD. No one I spoke to was able to offer any evidence that the president is "natural born." The burden of proof, it seems, must rest with the White House-- with president Obama himself, as these records are his, and he has chosen to conceal them at considerable legal expense. Remarkably, there is no enforcement mechanism for the Constitution's Article II, Section 1 requirement that the president be a "natural born" citizen -- voters have largely relied on an honor system and a free press to vet candidates for the highest political office in the nation.
While President Obama's records remain hidden, public consternation is growing. The American people have the right to know that their president is constitutionally eligible to serve as Commander-in-Chief and thereby may lawfully direct servicemembers into harm's way. I will be proud to deploy to Afghanistan to further serve my country and my fellow soldiers, but I should do so only with the knowledge that this important requirement of our Constitution is respected and obeyed. Those in uniform who continue to risk their lives and give the ultimate sacrifice to the service of our country deserve to know that they do so upholding their vows to the oath of office and to the Constitution.
Until an original birth certificate is brought forward that will validate the Commander-in-Chief's constitutional eligibility and put to rest the reasonable questions surrounding it, I cannot in good conscience obey any of my military orders. Unless it is established (sufficient proof that should be easily within the president's power to provide) that he is constitutionally eligible to serve as president and Commander-in-Chief, I and all other military officers are at risk of following illegal orders.
There is no legitimate privacy right to information necessary to prove that President Obama is legally eligible to serve as Commander-in-Chief.
I remain at risk of arrest and court-martial, but am mindful always that my oath of office is to the Constitution. It fills me with great sadness that on 31 March, I declined a direct order from my Medical Brigade Commander. This is a man I honor and wished to meet in order to thank him for his unquestionable valor and courage, and yet I could not obey his order. Now, he could order my arrest at any time.
I hope that President Obama will demonstrate his respect for the U.S. Constitution and release his original birth certificate. My bags are packed, and I look forward to joining my fellow soldiers in Afghanistan, but I will deploy only with the knowledge that I am following legal orders under a lawful Commander-in-Chief.
For those readers wanting to follow my ongoing story, the American Patriot Foundation has set up a legal defense fund to help me, and they tell me that they will be posting up-to-date information about my case. Their website is .
Dr. Terrence Lakin is an active duty Lieutenant Colonel who serves as Chief of Primary Care at the Pentagon's TRICARE health clinic; he has been selected for promotion to Colonel.
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: army; bho44; bhofascism; bhotreason; birthcertificate; birthers; certifigate; cicobama; eligibility; elvisbinladen; lakin; military; naturalborncitizen; obama; teaparty; terrylakin; usurper
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340, 341-360, 361-380 ... 441-458 next last
To: LucyT
And, even if voting etc will get him out, people need to know who he is - or what he isn’t - what’s at stake, why it’s not “just another horse race between equal politicians, just another political nothing, I’ll stay home” etc.
Plus the more publicity and outcry, the more likely Rs running for office will wake up and smell the coffee as well.
341
posted on
04/08/2010 7:40:09 PM PDT
by
little jeremiah
(Asato Ma Sad Gamaya Tamaso Ma Jyotir Gamaya)
To: Forty-Niner
I wholeheartedly agree with you. If a dozen or two courageous military officers would join the LTC in challenging their orders, it would change the dynamic of the situation from a political perspective.
342
posted on
04/08/2010 7:40:15 PM PDT
by
magooey
(then - NO JUSTICE! NO PEACE!, now - NO DATA! NO WARMING!)
To: Canadian Outrage
You never fail to show up do you? You are so pathetic. CO And here you are as well.
To: Artemis Webb
Waste of time. Waste of effort. The battle against Obama will be at the polls, not in the courts. This birther crap is past getting old.
You simply do not see what is at stake, what we are up against, nor what it means if this truth can be exposed.
Take your pick...
Constitutional Crisis to deal with...
Or Communist Manifesto crisis to live with.
Pelosi, Reid, Obama... All pawns... total idiots... completely incompetent...
But the man behind the curtain is a genius, and everything that has taken place so far is according to plan... even the takeback of congress in 2010.
This is my prediction...
If Obama is not out of office before or shortly after the new republican congress takes office, this country is gone.
To: neverdem
There isn’t any question on one point:
He definitely is not a “narural born” citizen; there never has been a speck of question about this.
.
345
posted on
04/08/2010 7:41:23 PM PDT
by
editor-surveyor
(Obamacare is America's kristallnacht !!)
To: El Gato; Non-Sequitur; Candor7; Fred Nerks; BP2
In fact all persons born outside the US, but "citizens" at birth under statute law are "naturalized", for the power of defining a rule of naturalization is the only power Congress has over citizenship. Congress can't create a natural born citizen. It's beyond the scope of its powers. :-)
To: El Gato
How can someone not eligible to an office hold it, other than de facto? It's a logical impossibility. That is not what is in dispute, at least here. The situation simply is ... and that defies logic and causes us all to go into various states of Cognitive Dissonance.
Yes he is the de facto President, but that would cease to be the case once it was adjudicted (ajudicated) that he was indeed not eligible.
The opinion of either the Federal District Court in DC, and the Appeal to SCOTUS, upholding that he was ineligible, would certainly be noticed in Congress. But then Congress would still have to get it together to Impeach, and Convict. Faker, Fraud, or Fool though he may certainly well be, only congress can remove him. Ironically, the Constitution he violated, actually now offers him a great deal of protection.
I believe your real question is, "If The SCOTUS were to uphold an opinion that he was ineligible, wouldn't Congress immediately Impeach the SOB in the House and immediately Convict the commie punk in the Senate?"
Answer: "Depends on who's in Congress, and what your definition of immediate is." And no matter who's in charge, I am willing to bet that you wouldn't like their idea of "operating in a speedy and efficacious manner."
At any rate, there is absolutely nothing about his eventual removal from office that would be automatic upon the findings of any court that he was ineligible.
347
posted on
04/08/2010 7:41:59 PM PDT
by
Kenny Bunk
(Obama. He'll bring back States' Rights. In the meantime, this ain't gonna be pretty.)
To: Artemis Webb
348
posted on
04/08/2010 7:42:43 PM PDT
by
bmwcyle
(Free the Navy Seals)
To: El Gato
The difference being that the CBS story was denigrating Bush, while the Narobi story was celebrating Obama's status as US Senator who was a native of Kenya. No in both cases there wasn't any evidence supporting the claim. The difference is you dismiss one as bogus and swallow the other one whole.
To: Canadian Outrage
You are a pest on any thread to do with this subject which tells me that you are a hired hack. It's nice to see you're consistent. Consistently wrong.
To: El Gato
But if one believed the order was illegal, then one not only could disobey it, one was bound to do so. And it worked out so well for New and Watada, didn't it? The military takes a dim view of personnel who decide for themselves if an order is legal or not.
To: El Gato
How can you defend or uphold it without "interpreting it?" Letting others tell you what it means is just another form of "I was just obeying orders". Obeying the orders of my commanding officer is what I was expected to do. LCOL Lakin is no different.
To: neverdem
Larkin should at all times carry a copy of his oath, the US Constitution, and Senate Resolution 511.
353
posted on
04/08/2010 7:50:36 PM PDT
by
bgill
(The framers of the US Constitution established an entire federal government in 18 pages.)
To: TheThinker
I get the distinct feeling Obama never meant to hold onto the presidency for long. And that sends chills up my spine. Agreed with both. That's why he's shoving things through so fast and furious. Much damage to do in very little time.
354
posted on
04/08/2010 7:52:26 PM PDT
by
bgill
(The framers of the US Constitution established an entire federal government in 18 pages.)
To: El Gato
355
posted on
04/08/2010 7:54:51 PM PDT
by
mojitojoe
(I don't care what you passed. you are irrelevant. I'll NEVER comply in any way. Read my lips, NEVER!)
To: Canadian Outrage
BINGO! You hit a home run with that post.
356
posted on
04/08/2010 7:59:12 PM PDT
by
mojitojoe
(I don't care what you passed. you are irrelevant. I'll NEVER comply in any way. Read my lips, NEVER!)
To: Artemis Webb
I dont think hell show it because no court capable of forcing him to show it has done so.Nancy and company knew and side stepped the issue. He should have brought it out then but didn't. He, himself, was on the Senate Resolution 511 committee that determined McCain was eligible through birth on US soil and from two US citizen parents to define NBC. McCain didn't force him through the same eligibility committee - WHY? There were several times he should have shown it, but too many wanted it all hushed. Hillary tried to get it out there but she was suddenly shunned by congress and was pulled from the running. Something evil this way comes.
357
posted on
04/08/2010 8:03:27 PM PDT
by
bgill
(The framers of the US Constitution established an entire federal government in 18 pages.)
To: ASA Vet
We should just agree to accept the COLB forgery as a true birth document of Resident Obama. The COLB shows that he is NOT a Natural Born Citizen. Exactly. Take him to court on the fake COLB's African father and if it's not the real BC, then he's pretty much stepped in it.
358
posted on
04/08/2010 8:06:37 PM PDT
by
bgill
(The framers of the US Constitution established an entire federal government in 18 pages.)
To: LucyT; rodguy911; Las Vegas Ron; BP2; MHGinTN; pissant; Gemsbok; little jeremiah; Fred Nerks; ...
359
posted on
04/08/2010 8:09:43 PM PDT
by
mojitojoe
(I don't care what you passed. you are irrelevant. I'll NEVER comply in any way. Read my lips, NEVER!)
To: mojitojoe
360
posted on
04/08/2010 8:10:22 PM PDT
by
Vendome
(Don't take life so seriously... You'll never live through it.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340, 341-360, 361-380 ... 441-458 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson