Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Slaughter Solution: The Metamorphosis of The American Republic Into Government By Fiat
NewsReal ^ | MARCH 14 | LIZ BLAINE

Posted on 03/14/2010 1:34:49 PM PDT by BarnacleCenturion

A very dangerous act is being attempted by the Left to secure their rule over the American people and transform the legislative process from a Constitutional Republic to a government by fiat. Today on Fox News Sunday, Democratic leader Rep. Chris Van Hollen admitted Democrats intend to use the unconstitutional “Slaughter Rule” as a solution to ram nationalized health care through Congress without majority vote and in defiance to the will of the American people.

The Slaughter rule would declare that the House of Representatives “deems” the Senate health care bill “passed” by the House. House members would have to vote on whether to accept the rule, but would then be able to claim they only voted for a rule, not for the bill itself. In other words, Democrats will avoid a direct vote on the health care bill while allowing it to become law! They will take over one-sixth of the US economy without voting on it in direct violation to the legislative process defined by the U.S Constitution.

(Excerpt) Read more at newsrealblog.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 111th; bhohealthcare; bribes; constitution; fiat; fraud; lies; obama; obamacare; pelosi; reid; republicanusage; selfexecutingrule; slaughter; slaughterhouse; tyranny
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last
To: BarnacleCenturion

I “deem” any such act an act of treason, as it violates their oath to uphold the Costitution. Since it is a treasonous act, compliance is complicity in treason.

Fight, fight and fight some more. The choice is either freedom or chains. Since slavery is outlawed, any law that wou;d enslave us is invalid.


41 posted on 03/14/2010 3:02:58 PM PDT by NTHockey (Rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BarnacleCenturion
PLEASE DON'T SHOOT THE MESSENGER!!

Okay, here's a TIME post listing those times when Republicans hve used the self-executing rule or so-called Slaughter Solution -- complete with quotes from Dems SCREAMING about Republicans using the self-executing rule. You see, there's really nothing new in Washington....

And here's a post supporting the constitutionality of the self-executing rule.

I'm not a constitutional lawyer, so all this beats me. But the fact is the so-called Slaughter solution, or self-executing rule, has been used before and has been used by Republicans, who only recently started calling it the Slaughter Solution because LOL it sounds so nasty.

42 posted on 03/14/2010 3:04:43 PM PDT by kittykat77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Da Coyote

Yep. Just around the corner. Is your powder dry?


43 posted on 03/14/2010 3:18:30 PM PDT by clee1 (We use 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 2 to pull a trigger. I'm lazy and I'm tired of smiling.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: zerosix

Well for starters you need to read Saul Alinski’s Rules for Radicals. If they want to do violence to the constitution then you show up witht a large vociferous and angry crowd at the congressman’s district office and you hang around there until he is forced to close it. Then you find out where his house is, where his kids go to school, grandmas house etc etc and you show up there with a large and vociferous crowd.

If your congressman wants to start down an illegal and unconstitutional path then follow him down that path and chances are he will soon see why we have laws and why we expect even congressmen to obey them. See if your congressman really wants to let the genie out of the bottle because I think he is living under the delusion that civil society is maintainable by a handful of police officers and the publics unwillingness to go as far as he would to get what he wants.


44 posted on 03/14/2010 3:19:27 PM PDT by amongolian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: downtownconservative

The miracle of the USA is that some of its patriots are from countries that have subjected its citizens to the exact form of government, now once again trying to be forced on them.
I believe that the USA will survive obama.
I also believe that Sen. Joe McCarthy will be looked back on as a true Patriot, who understood the danger that Communism,Socialism posed to our Country, that they ingrained themselves into all aspects of Governance, the media, entertainment as propaganda, and most destructive of all academia.
What is currently playing out in Texas regarding school books, and all the Tea Parties, lead me to believe that there is indeed an awakening of patriotism.


45 posted on 03/14/2010 3:21:20 PM PDT by pennboricua
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: BarnacleCenturion

Boehner should take to the House floor tomorrow and call for her immediate expulsion, IMO.


46 posted on 03/14/2010 3:31:03 PM PDT by Daisyjane69 (Michael Reagan: "Welcome back, Dad, even if you're wearing a dress and bearing children this time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pennboricua

Optimism is good. Mine is at an all time low.


47 posted on 03/14/2010 3:35:33 PM PDT by downtownconservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: John-Irish
"These bastards have got to be stopped."

Any ideas on how to do this? Do you think it's possible to do without resorting to armed conflict?
48 posted on 03/14/2010 3:36:29 PM PDT by Banjoguy (Barack H. Obama and the Democrats are at war with the American people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: amongolian

And you point is, besides not being able to count on any elected official to stop this madness?


49 posted on 03/14/2010 3:47:32 PM PDT by zerosix (native Sunflower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Banjoguy

Armed conflict? Against who? It isn’t the citizenry that’s declared war, its the Democrat Party that has. Novemebr is the only hope. Should that fail...then maybe yes, something drastic. Arresting top Dems, impeachment proceedings against the president.. something.


50 posted on 03/14/2010 3:52:38 PM PDT by John-Irish ("Shame of him who thinks of it''.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: BarnacleCenturion

Soylent Green, You Tube has many more scenes...worth watching a few.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6MjoPzQUKCU&NR=1

Defeat Obamacare call list: List now contains the new MAYBES culled from FR posts. Be sure to call KNOWN RINOS too.

KEEP THE CALLS UP! DC OFFICE LOCAL OFFICE

Code Red” - House Target List on Health Care

The National Republican Congressional Committee has published a target list on health care. In addition to continuing to contact the five Tennessee Democrat Congressmen, you can go http://www.votervoice.net/link/clickthrough/ext/94697.aspx to contact some of these targets. Much of the talk following Obama’s announcement has focused on how to defeat this second bill through reconciliation, but that is misleading because the first step to defeating Obamacare is not by concentrating on defeating the “fixer” bill but by defeating the Senate bill in the House when it goes to the floor for an up-or-down vote on Thursday, March 18th.

Rep. Lincoln Davis 202-225-6831 Columbia office: 931-490-8699
Rep. Jim Cooper 202-225-4311 Nashville office: 615-736-5295
Rep. Bart Gordon 202-225-4231 Murfreesboro office: 615-896-1986
John Tanner (202) 225-4714, Union City, (731) 885-7070, Jackson Phone: (731) 423-4848, Millington (901) 873-5690 TN (MAYBE)
Rep. Steve Cohen 202-225-3265 Memphis office: 901-544-4131
Harry Mitchell (202) 225-2190 (480) 946-2411 AZ 5th District
Gabrielle Giffords (202) 225-2542 (520) 881-3588 AZ 8th District
Ann Kirkpatrick (202) 225-2315 (928) 226-6914 AZ 1st District
Jerry McNerney (202) 225-1947 925-833-0643 CA 11th District
John Salazar 202-225-4761 970-245-7107 CO 3rd District
Jim Himes (202) 225-5541 (866) 453-0028 CT 4th District
Alan Grayson (202) 225-2176 (407) 841-1757 FL 8th District
Bill Foster (202) 225-2976 630-406-1114 IL 14th District
Baron Hill 202 225 5315 812 288 3999 IN 9th District
Mark Schauer (202) 225-6276 (517) 780-9075 MI 7th District
Gary Peters (202) 225-5802 (248) 273-4227 MI 9th District
Dina Titus (202) 225-3252 702-256-DINA (3462) NV 3rd District
Carol Shea-Porter (202) 225-5456 (603) 743-4813 NH 1st District
Tim Bishop (202) 225-3826 (631) 696-6500 NY 1st District
John Hall (202) 225-5441 (845) 225-3641 x49371 NY 19th District
Bill Owens (202) 225-4611 (315) 782-3150 NY 23rd District
James Matheson Toll-Free Number 1 (877) 677-9743 (202) 225-3011Mike Arcuri (202)225-3665 (315)793-8146 NY 24th District
Dan Maffei (202) 225-3701 (315) 423-5657 NY 25th District
Earl Pomeroy (202) 225-2611 (701) 224-0355 ND At-Large District
Steven Driehaus (202) 225-2216 (513) 684-2723 OH 1st District
Mary Jo Kilroy (202) 225-2015 (614) 294-2196 OH 15th District
Zach Space (202) 225-6265 (330) 364-4300 OH 18th District
Kathy Dahlkemper (202) 225-5406 (814) 456-2038 PA 3rd District
Patrick Murphy (202) 225-4276 (215) 826-1963 PA 8th District
Christopher Carney (202) 225-3731 (570) 585-9988 PA 10th District
Paul Kanjorski (202) 225-6511 (570) 825-2200 PA 11th District
John Spratt (202) 225-5501 (803)327-1114 SC 5th District
Tom Perriello (202) 225-4711 (276) 656-2291 VA 5th District
Alan Mollohan (202) 225-4172 (304) 623-4422 WVA 1st District
Nick Rahall (202) 225-3452 (304) 252-5000 WVA 3rd District
Steve Kagen (202) 225-5665 (920) 437-1954 WI 8th District
Bart Stupak (202) 225 4735 MI (MAYBE)
Brian Baird (202) 225-3536, Vancouver, (360) 695-6292. Olympia, (360) 352-9768, (MAYBE)
senator mark begich (202) 224-3004 toll free. (877) 501 - 6275 just became a MAYBE
Jason Altmire 202-225-2565, Aliquippa, 724-378-0928,
Natrona Heights, 724-226-1304 (MAYBE)

On the Bubble (Major developments from the “yes” and “no” columns in the House)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2467046/posts

Congressional Dems on Twitter
http://www.arrghpaine.com/congressional-dems-on-twitter

And here are toll-free numbers we can use to call any Senators or Reps.
At the first number below you must wait through a tape recording urging you to tell your Rep or Senator to vote “yes” for the health care bill. Just hang on and when the recording is over, you will get the Capitol operator. Just ask for your Rep or Senator’s office. Then you will either talk to an aid or have the chance to leave a message for him/her to vote NO on the health care bill.

When you use the second number and the Capitol operator comes on, just ask for your Rep or Senator’s office. Every time I use this number I get the Rep or Senator’s answer machine, so it may be set up that way all the time...to go to their answer machine. Either way you can leave a message to vote NO on the health care bill!

We need to use these toll free numbers that have been set up for the health care/ BO supporters and illegals to use! After all they are FREE!
1-800-828-0498
1-866-220-0044


51 posted on 03/14/2010 3:54:26 PM PDT by GailA (obamacare paid for by cuts & taxes on most vulnerable Veterans, disabled,seniors & retired Military)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BarnacleCenturion

52 posted on 03/14/2010 3:54:42 PM PDT by Bean Counter (I keeps mah feathers numbered, for just such an emergency...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BarnacleCenturion; All

it’s time for the people to be heard. there are three ways:

1. violence
2. voting
3. protesting

while we reserve #1, #2 has shown itself ineffectuve as they stuff the ballot boxes and shutdown FBI investigations once in power. that leaves protest... but as we saw last fallen, even putting 2.5m people on their steps doesn’t matter to these people. so what can be done?

I believe the last step before violence would be financial. I understand the fedgov would disregard and jut print the money it needs... but it is a last step

as such, I would propose a protest website where people would pledge not to pay their income taxes... but instead file the forms and place the money in an interest bearing, offshore escrow account.

once the fedgov is back in line with the Constitution, the monies would be released

thoughts?


53 posted on 03/14/2010 4:06:43 PM PDT by sten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BarnacleCenturion; All
I keep telling you all what it really is...


54 posted on 03/14/2010 4:40:06 PM PDT by backhoe (All Across America, the Lights are being relit again...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: downtownconservative
Actually I think that was Honduras where the military and the supreme court - acting within the bounds of the Honduran constitution - had to remove the president - Manuel Zelaya - who was attempting just the same sort of power-grab the fascists, I mean democrats, are engaging in here. Other than that, however, you are spot on about this now being a full-fledged constitutional crisis.


55 posted on 03/14/2010 4:43:16 PM PDT by Oceander (The Price of Freedom is Eternal Vigilance -- Thos. Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: John-Irish

We need to bring in another Eisenhower. He had no problem making treasonists accountable.

We really should charge and try these people for treason.


56 posted on 03/14/2010 5:56:03 PM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: DrC; LucyT
“they don’t have law, even when the Senate bill is signed by Obama.” Huh? Once Obama signs the House-passed Senate version of the bill, it is LAW!!!!

Well that is the issue. As we endeavored to explain, obviously not clearly enough for you, the House action doesn't operate to pass the Senate bill under the Constitution which has a fairly precise description of what Congress must do in order to make law by passing bills. The Slaughter rule doesn't make it.

The point of what they are proposing to do in the House with the Slaughter rule is to get enough of a fake to make it past the Senate Parliamentarian as a Reconciliation Bill.

The only way that would leave an issue would be if the Senate doesn't pass the House bill; or if the Senate amends the House bill and the House does not concur and adopt the amendments--in short if they don't ultimately get both houses on a yes vote on the same bill.

In that case, all they have is this rule that says they assume they passed the Senate bill and that doesn't meet the Constitutional test of what it takes to make law and thus in my opinion the courts would likely throw out the Health Care law as not having been effectively adopted. Obviously, that's only an opinion and the Judge may not agree although I think in this case, the answer is pretty clear.

57 posted on 03/14/2010 6:23:31 PM PDT by David (...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Banjoguy

Get the Dems to include the following in their Slaughter bill, “the Senate bill is considered passed, and if the Senate does not approve the reconsilitation changes by November 1, 2010, the bill is considered not passed.”

Voila.


58 posted on 03/14/2010 6:28:48 PM PDT by rlbedfor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: BarnacleCenturion
Actually, the ruling of the Parliamentarian was to the effect that the bill has to be signed into law before the reconciliation process can move forward. That’s why Obambi postponed his trip. They’ll use the slaughter option to pass the senate bill, Obambi will sign it into law and then the reconciliation process will go forward with the fixes.

Same answer as my #57. It looks to me as though they are going to try to comply with the "signed into law" requirement with a fake. Adopting the Slaughter proposed rule does not appear to me to generate legislation that Obama could sign into law. He can sign the Senate bill but it is just not adopted legislation and it is not law.

And that is what the Senate Parliamentarian ought to say. If he doesn't, the issue could wind up presented to a court under the circumstances described in #57 which is likely to say the bill doesn't make law.

59 posted on 03/14/2010 6:34:10 PM PDT by David (...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Oceander

Yes! I stand corrected, it was Honduras. Thanks!


60 posted on 03/14/2010 6:40:14 PM PDT by downtownconservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson