[Free ThinkerNY]

[Diogenesis]

Obama and his science team should to the 57 Islamic
states which Pres_ _ent Obama represents and serves,
and join NASA in teaching them that GLOBAL WARMING
is as real as Obama’s American natural born citizenship.

[cranked]

Typical treehuggers, wackonutjobs who have utterly no clue that sending Jack Squat Barry out to do their bidding on “climate science” will be the kiss of death for it......

[Migraine]

Yes. They should go out.

Here are the very reasonable, very scientific ground rules: tell us what the numbers are (temperatures, sea levels) and how you obtained them, in detail.

DON’T tell us what computer models say is going to happen in 40 years.

Seems simple to me.

Or else, they should simply GO OUT.

[FlingWingFlyer]

Should Obama Send His Science Team on a National Campaign to Explain Climate Science?

I guess he could do that if he really needs to BLOW some more taxpayer dollars. We the People would just send out some real scientists to follow them around and make corrections.

[ATX 1985]

I had one of these liberal wackos use the typical condescending argument that the debate over Global Warming is really about believing in Science or not believing in Science.
Now, that has got to be one of the most paradoxical things I have ever heard. Since when is debate suppose to end on a subject that has only been seriously studied for a few decades at most?

I think after all the news that came out against these alarmists there was one bombshell that topped it all off.

I’m sure y’all heard of the methane leak in the East Siberian Arctic Shelf which could accelerate the rise of greenhouse gases at a rate above all of the Oceans combined!

Hmm... how many gas sources other than Algore’s mouth are also not being accounted for?

http://www.aolnews.com/science/article/hidden-gas-source-could-speed-global-warming/19383307

[abigailsmybaby]

Unfortunate errors?! What pure, unadulterated bullsh!t. They cooked the books from the very beginning. Data that didn’t lead to their predetermined outcome was shredded. That’s not an unfortunate error. Lying SOBs.

[hsalaw]

due to unfortunate errors made by scientists

"Unfortunate errors"? They were cooking the data, lying about their so-called findings, ignoring any scientific standards whatever, and hiding the actual hard facts with "the dog ate my homework" excuse, all to support the BIG LIE of AGW. "Unfortunate errors," my a**. They cheated, manipulated,lied, and got caught. The public has no time for this cr*pola any more. Good luck on that PR campaign.

[A message]

It's been a couple months of seriously bad PR for climate science, both due to unfortunate errors made by scientists

Manipulated data, lying, agenda driven falsehoods.

Very unfortunate for the watermelons indeed.

[blackbart.223]

"So how can climate scientists dig themselves out of the negative publicity trench and help reeducate the public on the dangers of climate change?

Funny how that word keeps popping up.

[WilliamofCarmichael]

Entertainment news.

Should Obama Send His Science Team on a National Campaign to Explain Climate Science?

"Yes! can't wait," scream fans.

"They make Monty Python's Flying Circus look positively dour," said one fan.

Obama Jivethon's Lying Circus' hilarious wild comic parody of science and religion expected to be released soon.

Green Grand Wallah Issues Fat Wad starring Al Gore . . . .

[eclecticEel]

I think they should. It would be entertaining to say the least.

[rfp1234]

...a well-funded noise machine intent on preserving the status quo at any cost.

B.S., nobody's glorifying the status quo. We need more domestic oil/gas drilling, not the same amount.

[rfp1234]

Most researchers find themselves completely out of their league in this kind of battle because it's their politically targeted "research" is only superficially about the science.

[astyanax]

So getting busted for cooking the books and lying through your teeth is considered “bad PR” now...

[haroldeveryman]

“Had it been promptly corrected and openly explained to the media, in full context with the underlying science, the story would have lasted days, not weeks.”

Translation: Had the individual who exposed the fraud perpetrated by the climate “scientists” been stupid enough to approach the main stream media with his evidence, he would have been fed in little pieces and fed to the sea gulls before any of this could be made public.

[Rocky]

The answer's not debating skeptics on TV, that's for sure.

Yeah, better not try that.

[rawcatslyentist]

>"Should Obama Send His Science Team on a National Campaign to Explain Climate Science?"

Way to recycle those white lab coats!!!

[Caipirabob]

Sure, there’s got to be something we could do with this surplus tar and feathers...

[steelyourfaith]

 

Beam me to Planet Gore !

[SteamShovel]

Should Obama Send His Science Team on a National Campaign to Explain Climate Science

Good idea, the lectures will end up just like the "town hall meetings" the congress critters were having last summer.....

.....At least it would give us another chance to push them back on their heels.

What is it about the Obama team?.....

.....They assert something that causes a huge negative public reaction

.....They conclude they need to push harder and "Kommunicate more effectively"

.....The public reacts as strongly or more strongly in the negative

.....Obama pushes even harder...

We are in a political climate where the feed forward signal has the wrong sign while the feedback has the correct sign. The system is doomed to spiral out of control.