Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

More Democrats come out against health care bill [Four from KY, IL, SD and NC]
CNN ^ | March 12, 2010 | Charles Riley and Jeff Simon

Posted on 03/12/2010 8:40:03 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet

As House Democratic leaders advised their members Friday to prepare for a legislative battle over health care that could stretch through next weekend, four additional rank-and-file Democrats have come out against the Obama administration's signature domestic priority.

Reps. Ben Chandler of Kentucky, Luiz Gutierrez of Illinois, Stephanie Herseth-Sandlin of South Dakota and Heath Shuler of North Carolina say they will vote against their party's health care plan, which may be headed to a final vote late next week.

"At this time, I am a 'no' vote on health care," said Gutierrez in a written statement. "It's no secret that I have been critical of proposals that would exclude our nation's hardworking immigrants from the health care exchange, and I would find it extremely difficult, if not impossible, to vote for any measure that denies undocumented workers health care purchased with their own dollars."

According to an ongoing CNN survey, 21 House Democrats have now indicated they will vote against the Senate bill when it comes to the floor, though six of those members say they would consider voting for it if it were significantly modified. Opponents of the bill need a total of 38 Democrats to vote against the measure to ensure its defeat, assuming that all Republican members remain unified in their opposition.

Some members made clear that their votes are not negotiable. Josh Taylor, a spokesman for Texas Rep. Chet Edwards, told CNN the congressman "voted 'no' on health care the first time around and will vote 'no' the second."

Proponents of the health care plan need 216 votes in order to pass the Senate plan. As of Friday, no Republicans said they would vote in favor of the bill, which would mean Democratic leaders must rely solely on votes from its own members.(continued)

(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Culture/Society; Government; Politics/Elections; US: Illinois; US: Kentucky; US: North Carolina; US: South Dakota
KEYWORDS: 111th; abortion; congress; democrats; healthcare; illinois; kentucky; liberalfascism; northcarolina; obamacare; prolife; reconciliation; socialism; socialisthealthcare; socializedmedicine; southdakota
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 161-165 next last
To: tallyhoe
"I guess we will have to put a steak through it’s heart to kill it once and for all!!!!"

Um....that would sure hurt, but a sharp stake would be far more effective. Just sayin'....

101 posted on 03/13/2010 5:40:25 AM PST by RightOnline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: wiggen; All

“Thats why its so amusing to see headlines for the past 3 months of Pelosi saying she has the votes yet no vote is ever taken. Its reported by one media outlet or another on a daily basis.”

What the Left is doing, what they ALWAYS do when they want to get something UNPOPULAR done, is straight out of Alinsky’s ‘Rules for Radicals.’ They’re in the #7-8-9 zone right now, IMHO.

The reason Hillary! didn’t get this done is that she strayed from the script!

“7. Tactics

“Tactics are those conscious deliberate acts by which human beings live with each other and deal with the world around them. ... Here our concern is with the tactic of taking; how the Have-Nots can take power away from the Haves.” p.126

Always remember the first rule of power tactics (pps.127-134):

1. “Power is not only what you have, but what the enemy thinks you have.”

2. “Never go outside the expertise of your people. When an action or tactic is outside the experience of the people, the result is confusion, fear and retreat.... [and] the collapse of communication.

3. “Whenever possible, go outside the expertise of the enemy. Look for ways to increase insecurity, anxiety and uncertainty. (This happens all the time. Watch how many organizations under attack are blind-sided by seemingly irrelevant arguments that they are then forced to address.)

4. “Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules. You can kill them with this, for they can no more obey their own rules than the Christian church can live up to Christianity.”

5. “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon. It is almost impossible to counteract ridicule. Also it infuriates the opposition, which then reacts to your advantage.”

6. “A good tactic is one your people enjoy.”

7. “A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag. Man can sustain militant interest in any issue for only a limited time....”

8. “Keep the pressure on, with different tactics and actions, and utilize all events of the period for your purpose.”

9. “The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.”

10. “The major premise for tactics is the development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition. It is this unceasing pressure that results in the reactions from the opposition that are essential for the success of the campaign.”

11. “If you push a negative hard and deep enough, it will break through into its counterside... every positive has its negative.”

12. “The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative.”

13. Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it. In conflict tactics there are certain rules that [should be regarded] as universalities. One is that the opposition must be singled out as the target and ‘frozen.’...

“...any target can always say, ‘Why do you center on me when there are others to blame as well?’ When you ‘freeze the target,’ you disregard these [rational but distracting] arguments.... Then, as you zero in and freeze your target and carry out your attack, all the ‘others’ come out of the woodwork very soon. They become visible by their support of the target...’

“One acts decisively only in the conviction that all the angels are on one side and all the devils on the other.” (pps.127-134)”

http://www.crossroad.to/Quotes/communism/alinsky.htm


102 posted on 03/13/2010 5:47:10 AM PST by Diana in Wisconsin (Save the Earth. It's the only planet with chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: RKBA Democrat

Wow. All I can say in response to your ‘reply’ above is.....damned hard to argue with a single word you said.


103 posted on 03/13/2010 5:52:34 AM PST by RightOnline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Fresh Wind

BTTT


104 posted on 03/13/2010 6:03:33 AM PST by Lots Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: RightOnline

Yeah. I don’t like being so much ‘in your face’, but I’m getting mightily p***ed off.

Or maybe I need to take up smoking again.


105 posted on 03/13/2010 6:07:40 AM PST by RKBA Democrat (Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Forget Gutierrez. He just wants special treatment for his primary constituency, the illegals.


106 posted on 03/13/2010 6:34:18 AM PST by ScottinVA (Glad to see Demonic Unhinged (DU) highlights and attacks my FR comments!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

This is the week to question who the Heck OBOZO HUSSEIN really is? Is he in fact the Phantom who has successfully hidden a sordid past until now? We knoq nothingabout him, except we have learned that the Doctors have told him he is consuming excessive amounts of Alchohol, which isn’t good for someone who might get the Red Phone call late at night while he is drunk and stoned as a skunk! Is OBOZO really the Closet Muslim who has non-Christian plans for AMERICA like he did in KENYA where Christians were burned alive and their churchs leveled when his cousin “ODINGA” lost the Election? OBOZO never said a word about thos e Atrocities!!!!!


107 posted on 03/13/2010 6:36:37 AM PST by True Republican Patriot (May GOD Continue to BLESS Our Great President George W. Bush!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT
>> I’ve wondered, if Obama simply said “my health care bill was approved in principle by both the house and senate . . . <<

No, he won't put it like that. He'll say:

"I deem that the House and Senate have passed my healthcare bill, therefore . . . . "

(Emphasis added by poster.)

108 posted on 03/13/2010 6:51:18 AM PST by Hawthorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: 50cal Smokepole; All

“Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.” -JFK


109 posted on 03/13/2010 7:00:31 AM PST by Red in Blue PA (If guns cause crime, then all of mine are defective!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
House Majority Whip James Clyburn told CNN last week that he does not have a hard count of how his fellow Democrats will vote.

"We don't know exactly what to whip," the South Carolina Democrat said. "And that's why we are waiting on these fixers to take place, and the moment we get the fixers done, post them for the American people, I will look in on it and the same way the American people will, and then I will know what to go to my caucus with."

They are waiting for "fixers"? Seems more like they're waiting for the right number of dominoes to fall. Sir, I believe you are lying. From another article:

The health care bill appeared on the cusp of passage in early January, but was derailed when Senate Republicans gained the strength needed to sustain a filibuster and prevent final approval. In the weeks since, leaders have come up with a two-part rescue strategy. It calls for the House to pass legislation that cleared the Senate in December, despite numerous objections, and for both houses to follow immediately with a second bill that makes changes to the first.

The second, fix-it bill would be drafted under rules that prevent Republicans from demanding Democrats produce a 60-vote super-majority, a threshold now beyond their reach.

House Democrats continued private meetings Friday to review elements of the still-emerging fix-it bill, but few details were immediately available

Pelosi is waving "fixes" in front of the Democrats when she has no need for them once the vote is taken on the senate bill. And Obama is staying in town to sign the senate bill once the vote it taken. Do I have this right?

110 posted on 03/13/2010 7:02:13 AM PST by GVnana ("Obama is incredibly naive and grossly egotistical." Sarkozy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
We need to keep the heat on.

Bump this thread and send the email. It is free unlike some other sites I've been to that were offering to do the same thing.

Say 'No' To Obamacare! Start Over Now

111 posted on 03/13/2010 7:04:03 AM PST by tutstar (Baptist Ping list - freepmail me to get on or off.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet; Owl_Eagle; casino66; Poetgal26; MarcinIN; John O; Buchannanite1000; Lou L; ...
According to the CODE RED COUNT right now:

YES.... NO...... UNDECIDED
186 201 44

"NO" needs to go to 216.


TOLL-FREE PHONE CALLING

These toll free arrangements were set up by Obamuniust organizations to support (pause for sticking out tongue) “health” “care” “reform.” Use them! After all, they are free! . At the first number you must wait through a brief Obamunist tape recording. Just hang on and when the recording is over, you will get the Capitol operator. Just ask for your Rep or Senator’s office. Then you will either talk to an aide or have the chance to leave a message for him/her to vote NO on the health care bill.

When you use the second number and the Capitol operator comes on, just ask for your Rep or Senator’s office

1-800-828-0498

1-866-220-0044

PLEASE CALL ………....... WASHINGTON DC ..….. LOCAL DISTRICT …..…
Harry Mitchell (AZ-5) (202) 225-2190 (480) 946-2411
Gabrielle Giffords (AZ-8) (202) 225-2542 (520) 881-3588
Ann Kirkpatrick (AZ-1) (202) 225-2315 (928) 226-6914
Jerry McNerney (CA-11) (202) 225-1947 (925) 833-0643
John Salazar (CO-3) (202) 225-4761 (970) 245-7107
Jim Himes (CT-4) (202) 225-5541 (866) 453-0028
Alan Grayson (FL-8) (202) 225-2176 (407) 841-1757
Bill Foster (IL-14) (202) 225-2976 (630) 406-1114
Baron Hill (IN-9) (202) 225 5315 (812) 288 3999
Mark Schauer (MI-7) (202) 225-6276 (517) 780-9075
Gary Peters (MI-9) (202) 225-5802 (248) 273-4227
Dina Titus (NV-3) (202) 225-3252 (702) 256-3462
Carol Shea-Porter (NH -1) (202) 225-5456 (603) 743-4813
Tim Bishop (NY-1) (202) 225-3826 (631) 696-6500
John Hall (NY-19) (202) 225-5441 (845) 225-3641 x49371
Bill Owens (NY -23) (202) 225-4611 (315) 782-3150
Mike Arcuri (NY-24) (202)225-3665 (315) 793-8146
Dan Maffei (NY -25) (202) 225-3701 (315) 423-5657
Earl Pomeroy ND (At-Large) (202) 225-2611 (701) 224-0355
Steven Driehaus (OH-1) (202) 225-2216 (513) 684-2723
Mary Jo Kilroy (OH-15) (202) 225-2015 (614) 294-2196)
Zach Space (OH-18) (202) 225-6265 (330) 364-4300
Kathy Dahlkemper (PA-3) (202) 225-5406 (814) 456-2038
Patrick Murphy (PA-8) (202) 225-4276 (215) 826-1963
Christopher Carney (PA-10) (202) 225-3731 (570) 585-9988
Paul Kanjorski (PA-11) (202) 225-6511 (570) 825-2200
John Spratt (SC-5) (202) 225-5501 (803) 327-1114
Tom Perriello (VA-5) (202) 225-4711 (276) 656-2291
Alan Mollohan (WV-1) (202) 225-4172 (304) 623-4422
Nick Rahall (WV-3) (202) 225-3452 (304) 252-5000
Steve Kagen (WI-8) (202) 225-5665 (920) 437-1954
Bart Gordon (TN-6) (202) 225-4231 (615) 896-1986
Bart Stupak (MI-1) (202) 225 4735 (906) 228 3700

And the very well-organized Susan B. Anthony List is running radio ads in Nine (9) Key Congressional Districts represented by Pro-Life Democrats. They are strongly urging those Congressmen to STAND FIRM and vote NO on DeathCare.

To listen to a sample ad, CLICK HERE.

THIS IS CRUCIALLY IMPORTANT.

CLICK AND SUPPORT THESE TARGETTED CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT RADIO ADS

Do it now and stop DeathCare.

Or don't do it, and regret it for the rest of your natural life.

112 posted on 03/13/2010 7:11:54 AM PST by Mrs. Don-o (Want to do something about it? Then do something about it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
So Guttierez thinks that we shouldn’t deny ilegals from purchasing coverage with their own dolllars.....well, I believe that they probably could purchase their own insurance privately now. What he wants is for them to be able to purchase taxpayer subsidized insurance throught the govt exchange. They pay a little, we pay a lot.
113 posted on 03/13/2010 7:12:40 AM PST by Lets Be Frank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CatOwner

AP is a partisan in this issue (killing babies). They are going to tell us that it’s all over so we stop working to defeat them.


114 posted on 03/13/2010 7:16:51 AM PST by muawiyah ("Git Out The Way")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
"I would find it extremely difficult, if not impossible, to vote for any measure that denies undocumented workers health care purchased with their own dollars."

Flatly un-American...yes, I said it. J accuse! She won't vote for a federal health care program because it doesn't provide health benefits to foreign nationals...who are in the U.S. illegally. She's supposed to represent American citizens not the interests of foreign nationals.

Got to hand it to the Dems...even with a supermajority they're finding it nearly impossible thanks in part to their workers-of-the-world-unite commie bullsh*t.

115 posted on 03/13/2010 7:17:55 AM PST by americanophile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: momincombatboots

Didn’t Heath Shuler vote yes the first time?


116 posted on 03/13/2010 7:18:12 AM PST by WashingtonSource
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: caww

Amendments aren’t allowed in the process selected, so while someone gets to posture politically, it won’t be part of the bill.


117 posted on 03/13/2010 7:21:59 AM PST by browniexyz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Red in Blue PA
I and many others have done an informal, full psych profile--ironically enough--on our own Commander in Chief. On Barack Hussein Obama. This man because of his derangement, not to mention political connections, Marxist philosophy and patent disloyalty to the United States and our Constitution, would not even be granted a low-level security clearance in a sensitive defense plant--what with all of his baggage. And yet, he sits near an aide carrying the "football". Chilling Saturday morning thought, eh?

He is going for broke. With this Obamacare, and ramming it down the People's throats, despite massive opposition. This is it, BIG TIME.

He knows that if he loses this, he is essentially a LAME DUCK for three of his four year term, and that his progressive, incrementalist approach to Communize the country has fallen flat on its face.

Which leaves him with some chilling options, the disgraced narcissist will have had lost massive face. More than likely this will preciptate a chain reaction of events causing the classic Liberal Know-it-All, Better-than-Thou Personality to erupt in an irrational tirade. And revenge. And dark, evil plotting with a vengeance. But here is is the EWS: Observe closely what low-level White House staff and interns wil start to do. First as trickle and then as a stream? This will be most instructive. There will be an ternal buzz and a rumor that the old man has lost it--but the White House press corps will sit on it. Freepers in the know will need to hang out in the usual Georgetown and Capitol Hill and K Street and Conecticut Avenue haunts and keep their ears to the ground. These people will start to quietly resign, circulate their resumes in D.C., or slowly go back to political science classes at Liberal Arts universities outside of the beltway. Dejected, and going on instinct, they won't want the name "Obama" anywhere on their CVs as much as they can help it. And this will be the first canaries in the cave for us.

And that may be, among other options, for Obama to "lose it" in a rage and call out the tanks into the streets. You can already see and sense the anger daily building in this man's face and tone of voice.

Obama is not an American. I don't mean that necessarily with respect to the Kenyan Birth issue, although that looms, but what I am saying is what the Japanese would say in observing such a powderkeg of a situation, 文字通り this man is not an American. It is not his background, his upbringing, his demeanor, his heart, his friends and mentors and inner circule, his childhood, his value systems. He is so out of touch with mainstreet America and is trying to force something very elitist and very foreign on the average American Jane and Joe. And they are not putting up with it anymore.

So he calls out the tanks in anger since the peons did not accept his benevolent sacrifice to become president and "rescue" America and Americans from themselves. Stupid Americans (is what he truly thinks.).

And this individual. This phony. This imposter. This dangerous and most nasty man, is in for one big surprise when he sees thousands upon thousands of Tea Party-type Americans on the tops of those tanks, said tanks flying the Gadsden Flag, the turrets turning in curious directions, the tanks and APCs themselves moving in most intriguing directions. It can't happen HERE??!! Bovine Feces!! We live in interesting times. Hold on to your hats folks. The Giant is about to get kicked in the shins, but he is still going to maintain a lot of power with which he can try to make people suffer as payback for ever crossing "The One."

118 posted on 03/13/2010 7:38:40 AM PST by AmericanInTokyo (Its time to CLEARLY threaten a huge, middle-class American TAX REVOLT in Tea Party signs & placards)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I hope more will see the light and vote NO, but I am not too confident, just hoping.


119 posted on 03/13/2010 7:49:28 AM PST by b4its2late (A Liberal is a person who will give away everything he doesn't own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LS

The Hill website is reporting 34 RATS are firm NO, likely NO or leaning NO

178 GOP + 34 RATS means we have 212 NO

We need 216 to defeat

Keep up the pressure.

Notwithstanding the MSM lies, I believe our vote count is better than Pelosi’s.


120 posted on 03/13/2010 7:50:08 AM PST by mwl8787
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 161-165 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson