Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Some miss George W. Bush, and they're not shy about it (Freep this poll about "Do you miss George
Star-Telegram ^

Posted on 03/12/2010 2:25:54 PM PST by ajay_kumar

More than a year after President George W. Bush left the White House, some people are getting a little sentimental about him.

Several weeks ago, a billboard popped up in Minnesota featuring a cheery picture of Bush smiling and waving, next to the phrase "Miss me yet?"

(Excerpt) Read more at star-telegram.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bush; politics; poll
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-105 next last
To: AZ .44 MAG

I think you got it right.

Carter was bad for the country without him knowing it.
Obama is bad for the country and he KNOWS it.


81 posted on 03/12/2010 7:22:50 PM PST by ajay_kumar (Need more Republicans of all stripes in congress to stop Obama's socialist agenda)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: ajay_kumar

Voted and yes I miss him terribly. He wasn’t perfect but he was heads and tails above the bastard we’re stuck with now!


82 posted on 03/12/2010 7:31:31 PM PST by Lucky2 (The most unqualified and ill-prepared person in the room is the POTUS, Barak Hussain Obama...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Don Corleone
"cause he's been replaced by a Marxist and a Marxist coup is not what this country needed.

Do you think that the Tea Party Movement & a desire to return to the basics would have happened had Juan McCain been elected in 2008? I highly doubt it.

83 posted on 03/12/2010 10:44:08 PM PST by ChrisInAR (You gotta let it out, Captain!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: ajay_kumar

Do you miss President Bush?

* Yes. I agree with the “Miss Me Yet?” campaign.
* No. It was time for a change.

Yes. I agree with the “Miss Me Yet?” campaign. (71%, 2626 votes)
71%
No. It was time for a change. (29%, 1098 votes)
29%
Total votes: 3724


84 posted on 03/12/2010 10:47:34 PM PST by EDINVA (Sarchasm (n): The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the person who doesn't get it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ajay_kumar

not saying much is it?


85 posted on 03/13/2010 10:28:02 AM PST by the long march
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: ajay_kumar

I even miss Clinton compared to the O


86 posted on 03/13/2010 10:28:25 AM PST by the long march
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: publana

yup


87 posted on 03/13/2010 10:28:50 AM PST by the long march
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

“I will love and respect the man and his family for the rest of my life. I believe that someday when THIS media has gone its’ way, he will be ranked as one of the greatest Presidents in History.”

Only if that history is written in Spanish.


88 posted on 03/14/2010 7:32:14 AM PDT by Favor Center (Targets Up! Hold hard and favor center!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ajay_kumar

“The current laws against illegal immigration have not stopped it”

The aren’t enforced.

“So we need something different.”

No, we need to enforce the existing law.

“As long as the illegals work cheap, no way in hell you or I can stop from businesses hiring them.”

Sure we can. Jail works.

“The liberals won’t vote for it and the business lobby will work against it.”

Which is why both parties can go straight to hell. Neither party works in the interests of the United States.


89 posted on 03/14/2010 7:37:20 AM PDT by Favor Center (Targets Up! Hold hard and favor center!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Favor Center

You are not being a realist.

The stark naked reality is that present laws are not being enforced. Why? Because the stark naked reality is that there
is no political will to do so.

The stark naked reality is that there is no political will to jail the employers of illegals. If there was the will, they would have already been jailed. Wishing and reality are two different things.

You can wish both parties go to hell, but the stark naked reality is that both parties are here to stay in spite of your tantrums.


90 posted on 03/14/2010 11:26:09 AM PDT by ajay_kumar (Need more Republicans of all stripes in congress to stop Obama's socialist agenda)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: ajay_kumar

I really was very angry at Bush, But now his terms were like the good old days.

Life wasn’t always a turmoil and people prospered.

It was really good when Ronald Reagan was President. Now that was the best of times.


91 posted on 03/14/2010 11:33:37 AM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ajay_kumar

“The stark naked reality is that present laws are not being enforced. Why? Because the stark naked reality is that there
is no political will to do so.”

I’m well aware of the rot in our political parties. I’m hoping to end that rot and run the scum out of office.

“You can wish both parties go to hell, but the stark naked reality is that both parties are here to stay in spite of your tantrums.”

Tantrums? You can join them, then.


92 posted on 03/14/2010 11:58:56 AM PDT by Favor Center (Targets Up! Hold hard and favor center!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: ajay_kumar

Compared to this numbnut, I miss Clinton even!


93 posted on 03/14/2010 12:00:17 PM PDT by ReneeLynn (Socialism is SO yesterday. Fascism, it*s the new black. Mmm Mmm Mmm.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: be-baw
It's a false choice anyway. Bush was term-limited.

Well said, FRiend.

94 posted on 03/14/2010 12:06:15 PM PDT by Night Hides Not (If Dick Cheney = Darth Vader, then Joe Biden = Dark Helmet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: awakened
He also, most importantly, believed in the Constitution of the United States as well as in the people of the United States.

Then why didn't he veto McCain-Feingold?

95 posted on 03/14/2010 12:07:56 PM PDT by Night Hides Not (If Dick Cheney = Darth Vader, then Joe Biden = Dark Helmet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Night Hides Not

“Then why didn’t he veto McCain-Feingold?”

Because he didn’t believe in the Constitution or people of the United States.


96 posted on 03/14/2010 12:10:19 PM PDT by Favor Center (Targets Up! Hold hard and favor center!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Favor Center
Look, I'll never regret voting for him twice, considering his opponents. His last two years were extremely disappointing, as I thought he was just trying to run out the clock.

For goodness sakes, even Rove finally admits that they should have spoken out against his enemies. That's a bit late Turdblossum, and I won't be spending any of my cash to buy your book. I get nauseous every time Hannity calls him "The Architect".

I'll buy Cheney's book, and that's about it.

97 posted on 03/14/2010 12:17:20 PM PDT by Night Hides Not (If Dick Cheney = Darth Vader, then Joe Biden = Dark Helmet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Night Hides Not

“Look, I’ll never regret voting for him twice, considering his opponents. His last two years were extremely disappointing, as I thought he was just trying to run out the clock. “

It was more than just his last two years. I wonder just how serious the Dems were in opposing him, considering who they ran? Gore and Kerry could’ve been the DNC’s version of Dole or McCain - someone put up to lose. The DNC certainly got quite a bit of its agenda passed under Bush they might not have under Gore or Kerry....

“I get nauseous every time Hannity calls him “The Architect”. “

The Architect of Defeat, maybe?


98 posted on 03/14/2010 2:04:48 PM PDT by Favor Center (Targets Up! Hold hard and favor center!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: Favor Center

I apologize for using the word tantrum.

What I was really trying to say is that a 3rd party at this juncture is a sure loser.

3rd party guarantees Obama style regimes for as long as the 3rd party siphons more votes away from GOP than the democrats..


99 posted on 03/14/2010 7:31:47 PM PDT by ajay_kumar (Need more Republicans of all stripes in congress to stop Obama's socialist agenda)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: ajay_kumar
Here's what I miss --

"Either you are with us
 or you are for the terrorists."
~~George W. Bush

100 posted on 03/14/2010 7:41:39 PM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-105 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson