Skip to comments.
Obama Is Bungling Russia
American Thinker ^
| March 12, 2010
| Kim Zigfeld
Posted on 03/11/2010 11:11:05 PM PST by neverdem
The tsunami of political devastation known as Barack Obama continues to wreak havoc abroad, both for American interests specifically and the cause of freedom and democracy generally (the two are often, happily, one and the same).
The disastrous consequences are most clearly visible in the case of Vladimir Putin's Russia.
First Obama
visited Russia and
displayed craven
weakness before his KGB counterparts in the Kremlin. He barely even paid lip service to American values,
crushing the spirits of Russia's democracy movement leaders, and his unilateral reversal of the Bush missile defense plan for Eastern Europe led only to more posturing and aggression by Russia against its neighbors and demands for more concessions from Obama.
And now, things have gotten even worse.
Obama has given the cold shoulder to Nicholas Sarkozy of France, apparently believing him to be part of the conservative rabble who are beneath his dignity to treat seriously. Panicked and offended at his loss of influence with the USA, Sarkozy has fallen back on the predictable French model:
Play the Russia card.
Specifically, Sarkozy has agreed to sell Russia
not one but four dangerous "Mistral" class battleships. Russia has only one purpose in mind for these vessels: It wants to use them to seal off the nation of Georgia from the sea, thereby significantly enhancing its ability to browbeat the tiny country back into the Russian "sphere of influence." This comes after Russia's failure in August 2008 to oust the democratically elected government by means of an invasion.
Sarkozy declared that "[w]e have to close ranks, the Russians and the French, because we have the same objectives." Does France plan to
join Russia in buzzing American shorelines and military bases with nuclear bombers? Will it next supply Russia with state-of-the-art airplanes to carry out that purpose? Will France join Russia in seeking to repel American vessels that might sail into the Black Sea in support of the Georgian democracy? Does France approve of the Kremlin's "objective" to murder journalists, crush dissent, wipe out political diversity, and destroy freedom and liberty?
Hopefully, France's attitude towards the USA is not yet that hostile. But France must seek, of course, to maximize its influence, and if it sees that Obama has already abandoned American values and will not support French interests, then why shouldn't Sarkozy play the Russia card?
Obama's willingness to abandon his own purported values is genuinely shocking. Russia has a pandemic problem of race murder, yet when Obama visited Moscow, he ignored it. When he
met with Russian human rights leaders at the White House recently, they reported that he told them, "Human rights is not the only issue that he has to take into account. Security and trade are also important, and he can't help but try to engage the governments in order to achieve result in these spheres."
Obama is apparently willing to sacrifice American values and his own principles on the altar of his fanciful notion that if he makes enough unilateral concessions to Russia and utters enough amorous phrases, he will transfer Russia's KGB government from pathological haters of America into a band of allies -- one which will, for instance, be willing to pressure Iran into giving up its dangerous nuclear weapons program.
Obama must have been surprised, then, to see Russia announce that it would press forward with its plan to
sell S-300 air defense missiles to Iran. These missiles can be used to shoot down any strike force that might seek to neutralize the nuclear threat. Surely Obama was also disappointed to learn that Russia is also dramatically
expanding its efforts to supply weapons to American foes in our hemisphere, including the rogue regime in Venezuela. Russia's foreign minister recently completed what the Heritage Foundation has called an "
in your face tour" of Latin America.
But there is no sign of any change in Obama's policy. Worse, there is little sign from Republican quarters that conservatives are willing to step up and challenge Obama's actions, even though they are clearly on the comeback trail in light of recent electoral victories.
One would think that the lesson of Chamberlain has stuck by now: Weakness begets only defeat. Unilateral concessions beget only demands for more of the same. If Republicans do not take immediate action to induce Obama to reverse course, then irreversible damage may be done to American interests where Russia is concerned.
TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Politics/Elections; Russia
KEYWORDS: bho44; bhorussia; blunders; democrat; democrats; france; georgia; impeachobama; iran; mistral; nato; obama; russia
From the link in the story:
Russia regards the Mistral as offering vital offensive capacity because the country lacks the ability to launch amphibious assaults. A single Mistral can deploy 16 helicopters, four landing barges and up to 70 armoured vehicles, including 13 battle tanks, and 450 troops.
1
posted on
03/11/2010 11:11:06 PM PST
by
neverdem
To: neverdem
But....I Thought Hillary reset things with the Russian's.....LOL
To: neverdem
Obama Is Bungling RussiaIs there anything Obambi isn't bungling?
3
posted on
03/11/2010 11:33:15 PM PST
by
xtinct
(The will of God will never take you where the Grace of God will not protect you..Be Strong Patriots!)
To: neverdem
"Obama Is Bungling Russia"No bungle, agenda.
yitbos
4
posted on
03/11/2010 11:33:52 PM PST
by
bruinbirdman
("Those who control language control minds.")
To: neverdem
” This comes after Russia’s failure in August 2008 to oust the democratically elected government by means of an invasion.”
Sorry, but Georgia initiated that little skirmish.
Obama is certainly bungling Russia, just like everything else he touches, but Russia has been bungled since the collapse of the Soviet Union.
We had an opportunity for Russia to be a super ally but the bungling idiots in D.C. totally screwed the chance Reagan handed us. Probably the most costly screw-up in the history of the world...with the exception of Zero in the White House.
5
posted on
03/11/2010 11:38:13 PM PST
by
flash2368
To: neverdem
Appeasement is the language 0baMao speaks. Unless he’s talking to Americans and then it’s “I won.”
6
posted on
03/11/2010 11:42:14 PM PST
by
TigersEye
(It's the Marxism, stupid! ... And they call themselves Progressives.)
To: flash2368
Sorry, but Georgia initiated that little skirmish.That is bull. Russia's invasion took weeks to months to put together and was preceded by material support for secessionists in Georgia. Either you don't know what happened there or you're shilling for the Ruskies.
7
posted on
03/11/2010 11:44:30 PM PST
by
TigersEye
(It's the Marxism, stupid! ... And they call themselves Progressives.)
To: neverdem
Either Stalin or Putin, The Russian empire remains a threat.
8
posted on
03/12/2010 12:13:52 AM PST
by
M. Espinola
(Freedom is never "free")
To: flash2368
Sorry, but Georgia initiated that little skirmish.Russia provoked the Georgian reaction to co-incide with the training exercise of their 58th Army. It was so obvious that the Washington Post saw it.
9
posted on
03/12/2010 12:14:54 AM PST
by
neverdem
(Xin loi minh oi)
To: neverdem
These are the consequences of electing as president a “Rock Star” whose sole executive credentials is watching 100 hours of “The West Wing.”
10
posted on
03/12/2010 2:01:32 AM PST
by
Brad from Tennessee
(A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.)
To: neverdem
Obama Is Bungling Russia Obama Is Bungling (Fill-In-The-Blank)
11
posted on
03/12/2010 2:34:19 AM PST
by
Haiku Guy
(If you have a right / To the service I provide / I must be your slave.)
To: TigersEye
Well said. Plus those Russians in the know got out of the ruble days before the invasion, because they knew it would tank.
The Georgians initiated nothing. They merely had the temerity to fire back at the South Ossetians who were bombarding them from the midst of a heavily populated urban area.
It’s like the Israelis being cast as the evil aggressors whenever Muslims rain down artillery fire on their schools.
To: neverdem
Uh... Mistral is a helicopter carrier, not a "battleship..."
To: pabianice
What do you think the reason was for comment# 1?
14
posted on
03/12/2010 8:17:54 AM PST
by
neverdem
(Xin loi minh oi)
To: agere_contra
Well said. Plus those Russians in the know got out of the ruble days before the invasion, because they knew it would tank.That is a piece of the story I hadn't heard before.
The Russians had been fomenting rebellion (for their own ends of course) for many years. The whole thing was a setup for an invasion.
15
posted on
03/12/2010 11:50:19 AM PST
by
TigersEye
(It's the Marxism, stupid! ... And they call themselves Progressives.)
To: xtinct
Is there anything Obambi isn't bungling? He's not bungling the U.S.
The U.S. he's buggering.
16
posted on
03/12/2010 12:50:57 PM PST
by
DuncanWaring
(The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
To: neverdem
Will France join Russia in seeking to repel American vessels that might sail into the Black Sea in support of the Georgian democracy?”
LOL
Anyone who thinks zer0 would lift a finger to defend Georgia is delusional.
I said before the election that Putin would absolutely gut this guy and it didn’t take 6 months. Vlad has to feel like a kid in a candy store concerning the ME and Eastern Europe.
17
posted on
03/12/2010 2:07:48 PM PST
by
bereanway
(Sarah get your gun)
To: AdmSmith; Berosus; bigheadfred; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; ...
C’mon, did anyone *really* expect him to do otherwise?
:’) Thanks neverdem.
18
posted on
03/12/2010 9:28:51 PM PST
by
SunkenCiv
(Freedom is Priceless.)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson