Posted on 03/05/2010 10:10:49 AM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
There is one caveat to South Korea gender balance. They are importing a lot of what you might call “mail order brides” from countries in SE Asia because so many SK women are too well educated to want to live in South Korea’s rural areas as farmers wives.
I'm confused. Are they baby girls or fetuses? Normally, this magazine calls them fetuses, here they call them baby girls. I'm so confused.
I wonder now if the next generation of Chinese men will go queer, or simply raid Mongolia, Korea, or Siberia for women.
China already has a big problem with prostitution and sexually related diseases including AIDS. Their continued preference for boys will only make this worse.
Young men without women to marry are good fodder for wars and terrorism.
Huh? I suppose I need some examples. Maybe they are talking about the Pro-Abortion Catholics in Congress. They specifically target blacks and not femailes. That would be genocide, not gendercide.
Good point.
“I wonder now if the next generation of Chinese men will go queer, or simply raid Mongolia, Korea, or Siberia for women.”
Or the USA...
Trafficking probe nets 10 Mexican migration agents
Associated Press 2010-03-03
Mexico’s interior department says prosecutors have detained 10 Mexican immigration agents and three airline workers at Cancun’s international airport on suspicion of****** trafficking Chinese migrants.********[headed to the USA!]
The department says in a statement that the agents, along with the two Mexicana Airlines employees and a worker of Livingston Air, allegedly allowed Chinese citizens into the country with false passports.
A statement issued Tuesday by the department says the arrests are part of an investigation that resulted in the detention of 26 immigration agents at Cancun’s airport in January.
http://www.etaiwannews.com/etn/news_content.php?id=1193808&lang=eng_news&cate_img=logo_world&cate_rss=WORLD_eng
Keyword: Chinese
In Arizona, a Stream of Illegal Immigrants From China
Jan. 23, 2010
Chinese caught en route to the U.S.Dec. 17, 2009
Chinese invasion underway in Arizona Nov. 6, 2009
Remember that the border patrol was initially formed to keep Chinese and Japanese immigrants from coming illegally via Mexico. At the time, Mexican immigrants were allowed to cross freely (believe it or not), while immigration from China and Japan was banned via the Chinese Exclusion Act and the “Gentleman’s Agreement” with the Japanese government.
The answer is that liberals don't have a problem with either. As Rush says, liberals view abortion as a holy sacrament. Abortion is a good thing in whatever manifestation it takes. This is why liberals do not oppose forced abortions in China. One of the first things Obama did when he became president was make an executive order to overturn the Mexico City Policy that banned using US taxpayer dollars to fund abortion overseas.
“At the time, Mexican immigrants were allowed to cross freely (believe it or not)”
I believe it... they used to go back to Mexico because that was before welfare for foreigners and the jackpot baby scam and the promise of amnesty over and over again.
Impossible. Goat-ramming and the like would just create sterile human-animal hybrids. I base that on the knowledge that mules (horse X donkey) are sterile.
I'll take "Military Invasions and Cultural Revolutions" for $1949, Alex.
With queerness apparently being an innate trait, I’ll go with panty-raids on neighboring countries.
“I can’t figure out why liberals think the gender-neutral murdering of baby girls is better than the gender-based murdering of baby girls.”
Because boys (and all things masculine) are evil to liberals.
I'm sorry in some ass backward countries they kill the little girls. Really, I am. Obviously, that's evil. But in our own country, how long will it be before we're offing the little boys?
It’s far more sinister then murdering babies. as if anything could be more sinister. Asians think in terms of centuries whereas Americans and Europeans think monyhly to yearly at best.
They are breading a future army. An army as others have posted that will be young sexually frustrated males who will need little motivation or brainwashing to go to war. Their standing army is already a frightening number and a glimpse of 20 years hence is frightening.
In the West, there’s a saying: “A daughter is a daughter all of her life; a son is a son until he takes a wife.” The expectation is that girls will stay closer to their families, and if you’ve already been through infertility and you’re only going to have one child, then you’ll play the odds with a girl. It’s the opposite of how they think the East.
IMO people adopting are more leery of boys because of the increased potential for behavior problems. Not all children are placed for adoption because their parents are dead or too poor to take care of them; some are placed because the parents are dysfunctional, and a tendency to mental illness or behavior problems is inheritable.
Boys act out more than girls generally speaking anyway even when there are no problems, and the couples adopting are usually older and may want a child who needs less energy in supervising.
And finally, my guess is that most adoptions are driven by the wife in a couple, and there are more single mother than single father adoptions. Most women would like at least one daughter; most men would like at least one son, but if he can’t have his own son by blood, then the child’s sex probably doesn’t matter so much.
I don’t think that female-favoring sex-selection is occurring or will occur with birth children the way it is with adoptive children in the West.
breading = breeding.Don’t want no breaded male.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.