Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Eric Massa to retire amid allegations he sexually harassed a male staffer
Politico ^ | 3/3/10

Posted on 03/03/2010 11:43:32 AM PST by Second Amendment First

Rep. Eric Massa (D-N.Y.) will not seek re-election after only one term in office.

According to several House aides – on both sides of the aisle – the House ethics committee has been informed of allegations that Massa, who is married with two children, sexually harassed a male staffer.

Massa and his office did not immediately respond to requests for comment, but his office has scheduled a press conference for later this afternoon.

Massa, a 20-year Navy veteran, was elected to office last November. He serves on the Agriculture, Armed Services and Homeland Security committees.


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: New York
KEYWORDS: 111th; another1bitesthedust; bisexualharrassment; cultureofcorruption; dontaskdonttell; draintheswamp; ericmassa; fdrq; lavendermafia; massa; onthedownlow; pelosicongress; poofter; sexualharassment; workplace
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 161-180 next last
To: DPMD

Perhaps as part of the “stimulus package”, Speaker Pelosi will hire The Village People to serenade him with “IN THE NAVY” with the punchline: “Shame on you, shame on you as a new recruit!!”


81 posted on 03/03/2010 12:09:07 PM PST by laconic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: pgkdan

Can’t spell Massa without ass!


82 posted on 03/03/2010 12:09:19 PM PST by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ( Ya can't pick up a turd by the clean end!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: dead

The problem is that now he has no reason to repeat his vote against 0bamacare. Advantage +1 to Pelousi.


83 posted on 03/03/2010 12:09:20 PM PST by henkster (A broken government does not merit full faith and credit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: frogjerk

It looks like it! Although everything around it is - I distinctly remember Chautauqua County (far left of the map) once being a part of that district when Amo Houghton, one of four Republicans to vote against impeaching Clinton. Now, Chautauqua’s been gerrymandered into Buffalo so that their congressman can safely ignore Chautauqua County and still handily win.


84 posted on 03/03/2010 12:09:39 PM PST by Dan Nunn (Some of us are wise, some of us are otherwise. -The Great One)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger; All

85 posted on 03/03/2010 12:10:07 PM PST by musicman (Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: DPMD

My daughter might try for Congressional Page next year (I’ll have to hide the House Impeachment Rally pics). My wife was worried about pervs but I said it was OK, she’s a girl. It sounds like all the boys are getting the attention these days.


86 posted on 03/03/2010 12:10:14 PM PST by AppyPappy (If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Seven plus One

Doesn’t that perpetuate and in fact condone a hostile working environment for the harrassed staffer?

Just holding them to their own book of rules, lol.


87 posted on 03/03/2010 12:10:46 PM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: johngaltspeaks

LOL.

You know the political climate is bad when you would rather be a gay sexual harasser than a supporter of Obama’s policies.


88 posted on 03/03/2010 12:11:07 PM PST by Retired Greyhound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise

Ya might want to put that conclusion in check. The staffer could be the “flaming poofter” and Massa ridiculed his sexuality.

That would constitute sexual harrassment.


89 posted on 03/03/2010 12:11:19 PM PST by Cletus.D.Yokel (Freepmail me to get on the Bourbon ping list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Retired COB
"At least they weren't underage pages."

If you are referring to Mark Foley, so you're saying that sexual harrassment of Male staffers is better than sending sexually explicit e-mail to underage pages? Is that your defense of Massa? To my knowledge, the main difference is that one is legal (sending sexually explicit e-mails to underage pages) and one is illegal (sexual harrassment).
90 posted on 03/03/2010 12:11:25 PM PST by Old Teufel Hunden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: the invisib1e hand

So I guess Bonnie Fwank is too OLD for him (her, it)?


91 posted on 03/03/2010 12:11:39 PM PST by Oldpuppymax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First
Does anybody have any information on what this "sexual harrassment" charge entails? Maybe he just called him an insensitive name or something.

I don't know, but the timing of this story breaking a day after Massa announces he will vote against the Senate version of the health care bill seems suspicious to me.

Might be a message intended to warn Democratic House members exactly how Nancy Pelosi intends on securing the necessary number of votes from her party.

92 posted on 03/03/2010 12:11:40 PM PST by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First
He was one of 39 House Democrats to vote against health care legislation; he said it didn’t do enough to control costs.

Unfortunately, this might mean Nancy will get one vote switch from 'no' to 'yes'.

93 posted on 03/03/2010 12:11:46 PM PST by paudio (Are you better off today than in 2006, when the Democrats took over the Congress?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: colorado tanker; OldDeckHand

Unfortunately, this guy voted against health care bill because it wasn’t single payer. He may vote for it now he has nothing to lose.

I had to steal this from Politico’s comments: “Wow, another democrat that thought the last election was a “man” date.”


94 posted on 03/03/2010 12:12:29 PM PST by Second Amendment First
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

Well that is different. It must be a real disgusting event to be in a Dum caucas meeting.


95 posted on 03/03/2010 12:13:25 PM PST by Marty62 (former Marty60)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Retired COB
I'm with you.

Sadly, the Dems don't have the market cornered on sexual deviancy.

96 posted on 03/03/2010 12:14:18 PM PST by Retired Greyhound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Old Teufel Hunden
Is that your defense of Massa?

You've read 'way too much into what I said. I'm not defending anybody for something this stupid. I happen to swing the other way (straight) but I wouldn't even consider dating someone at my workplace let alone do anything that could be construed as sexual harassment.

97 posted on 03/03/2010 12:15:06 PM PST by Retired COB (Still mad about Campaign Finance Reform)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Cletus.D.Yokel

The carefully stated “from both sides of the aisle” sort of puts that possibility into doubt. That Massa is a Democrat does, also. Less likely to have said it, and with ideology trumping all, an aggrieved “flaming poofter” would be far less likely to go public with the charge, if he actually had said it.


98 posted on 03/03/2010 12:15:46 PM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First
Unfortunately, this guy voted against health care bill because it wasn’t single payer. He may vote for it now he has nothing to lose.

That's what I am thinking.

99 posted on 03/03/2010 12:15:53 PM PST by onyx (BE A MONTHLY DONOR - I AM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Old Teufel Hunden

“the main difference is that one is legal (sending sexually explicit e-mails to underage pages) and one is illegal (sexual harrassment). “

Both are reprehensible and cannot be defended in anyway.

I’m surprised you would try.


100 posted on 03/03/2010 12:16:19 PM PST by Retired Greyhound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 161-180 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson