To: Retired COB
"At least they weren't underage pages."
If you are referring to Mark Foley, so you're saying that sexual harrassment of Male staffers is better than sending sexually explicit e-mail to underage pages? Is that your defense of Massa? To my knowledge, the main difference is that one is legal (sending sexually explicit e-mails to underage pages) and one is illegal (sexual harrassment).
To: Old Teufel Hunden
Is that your defense of Massa? You've read 'way too much into what I said. I'm not defending anybody for something this stupid. I happen to swing the other way (straight) but I wouldn't even consider dating someone at my workplace let alone do anything that could be construed as sexual harassment.
97 posted on
03/03/2010 12:15:06 PM PST by
Retired COB
(Still mad about Campaign Finance Reform)
To: Old Teufel Hunden
“the main difference is that one is legal (sending sexually explicit e-mails to underage pages) and one is illegal (sexual harrassment). “
Both are reprehensible and cannot be defended in anyway.
I’m surprised you would try.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson