Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Retired COB
"At least they weren't underage pages."

If you are referring to Mark Foley, so you're saying that sexual harrassment of Male staffers is better than sending sexually explicit e-mail to underage pages? Is that your defense of Massa? To my knowledge, the main difference is that one is legal (sending sexually explicit e-mails to underage pages) and one is illegal (sexual harrassment).
90 posted on 03/03/2010 12:11:25 PM PST by Old Teufel Hunden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]


To: Old Teufel Hunden
Is that your defense of Massa?

You've read 'way too much into what I said. I'm not defending anybody for something this stupid. I happen to swing the other way (straight) but I wouldn't even consider dating someone at my workplace let alone do anything that could be construed as sexual harassment.

97 posted on 03/03/2010 12:15:06 PM PST by Retired COB (Still mad about Campaign Finance Reform)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]

To: Old Teufel Hunden

“the main difference is that one is legal (sending sexually explicit e-mails to underage pages) and one is illegal (sexual harrassment). “

Both are reprehensible and cannot be defended in anyway.

I’m surprised you would try.


100 posted on 03/03/2010 12:16:19 PM PST by Retired Greyhound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson