Skip to comments.
US plans 'dramatic reductions' in nuclear weapons
bbc.com ^
| 3/1/10
Posted on 03/01/2010 7:46:57 AM PST by HDCochran
Barack Obama plans 'dramatic reductions' in US nuclear weapons stockpile. Headline only.
(Excerpt) Read more at news.bbc.co.uk ...
TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: agenda; appeasement; arsenal; bho44; bhonukes; cheeseeating; disarmament; drunkenobama; kenyankrockofkrap; missiledefense; nationaldefense; nationalinsecurity; nuclearweapons; nukes; obama; surrender; surrendermonkey; traitor; treason
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-158 next last
To: HDCochran
The kind of reductions I'd like to see is in the number of half-black, arrogant, neo-marxist a##holes in the presidency......soon.
41
posted on
03/01/2010 8:01:47 AM PST
by
tbpiper
To: Las Vegas Ron
Yep. Saw that in the run-up to the election and passed it along to folks.
42
posted on
03/01/2010 8:02:01 AM PST
by
Army Air Corps
(Four fried chickens and a coke)
To: HDCochran
This SOB isn’t going to be happy until he gets us all KILLED!
To: savedbygrace
.
He is not on America’s side.
Guess the voters were either voting to end our Republic — or were totally misled.
To: HDCochran
This might no be as bad as every thinks. From my understanding we have something like 2,800 nukes in our arsenal. We could eliminate quite a few of these and still have enough to blow up the world a few dozen times.
If done properly (which it probably won't be) we could save on the cost of maintaining and storing these weapons. Normally this would mean the savings is passed on to the tax payer but most liking the cost saving will go to something like ACORN.
45
posted on
03/01/2010 8:06:47 AM PST
by
A Texan
(Oderint dum metuant)
To: HDCochran
well,...the military leaders just need to go on record what they think is needed to win whatever is expected, based on growth of militaristic states, otherwise they have failed in their oath. And if the president disagrees, then the american people will decide who is right in 2012. Or congress impeaches.
46
posted on
03/01/2010 8:06:57 AM PST
by
Tulsa Ramjet
("If not now, when?" "Because it's judgment that defeats us.")
To: pabianice; DownInFlames; StarFan; Dutchy; alisasny; BobFromNJ; BUNNY2003; Cacique; Clemenza; ...
Has to be approved by Congress.It will in 2010. 2011 will be a different story.
Thanks for those reminders, pabianice and DownInFlames
47
posted on
03/01/2010 8:10:27 AM PST
by
nutmeg
(Rush Limbaugh & Sarah Palin agree: NO third parties! Take back the GOP)
Thank God that oBama's blatantly wrong policies are being watched like a hawk and scrutinized; each and every one.
He quickly reached the point where every single policy idea of his can easily be called "wrong" and "should not happen".
Cap n trade, obamacare, closing Gitmo - they should never come to be. The rule of the opposite applies easily.
To: HDCochran
Dismantling the United States, one brick at a time.
49
posted on
03/01/2010 8:12:28 AM PST
by
Lazamataz
(Seriously. The only way Obama can possibly pull this out is to declare Martial Law before November.)
To: HDCochran
Well, according to the msm, since the messiah was elected and the evil Bush and Cheney are gone, the world loves us again. Therefore, who needs nukes? We can beat them into plowshares.
50
posted on
03/01/2010 8:12:36 AM PST
by
sport
To: HDCochran
Somebody should let Jack Bauer know that it is NOT the Russians that are selling fissile material in the US. We now know that it is Obama. Can we please get Jack focused on cleaning up the right mess??? PLEASE.
51
posted on
03/01/2010 8:13:20 AM PST
by
USMA '71
((Re-elect no one!))
To: HDCochran
If this isn’t grounds for impeachment and removal, as he is tasked with protecting and defending the Constitution and this nation, I don’t know what is.
52
posted on
03/01/2010 8:13:30 AM PST
by
Secret Agent Man
(I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
To: July4
This guy's not kidding. He's going to take this republic down or die trying.I vote for option B).
53
posted on
03/01/2010 8:14:21 AM PST
by
Lazamataz
(Seriously. The only way Obama can possibly pull this out is to declare Martial Law before November.)
To: HDCochran
No one should be surprised. This was not “unexpected”. Nobama continues to get us to third world status.
To: HDCochran
Something has to give with this bastard. I see a showdown by July.
55
posted on
03/01/2010 8:14:59 AM PST
by
unkus
To: A Texan
This might no be as bad as every thinks. From my understanding we have something like 2,800 nukes in our arsenal. We could eliminate quite a few of these and still have enough to blow up the world a few dozen times.Not enough.
Needs more cowbell.
56
posted on
03/01/2010 8:15:21 AM PST
by
Lazamataz
(Seriously. The only way Obama can possibly pull this out is to declare Martial Law before November.)
To: Lazamataz
57
posted on
03/01/2010 8:16:19 AM PST
by
A Texan
(Oderint dum metuant)
To: HDCochran; Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; ...
58
posted on
03/01/2010 8:20:05 AM PST
by
Nachum
(The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
To: HDCochran
Healthcare, an Assault Weapons Ban, Immigration “Reform” (AKA Amnesty), and now a surrender to the world by giving up our nukes.
59
posted on
03/01/2010 8:20:59 AM PST
by
Thunder90
(Fighting for truth and the American way... http://citizensfortruthandtheamericanway.blogspot.com/)
To: HDCochran
Wouldn't be so bad if I thought he had a credible plan for building up U.S. military strength in materiel, manpower, and morale.
Which, if course, he isn't.
The rest of the article is here:
US plans 'dramatic reductions' in nuclear weapons
US President Barack Obama is planning "dramatic reductions" in the country's nuclear arsenal, says a senior US administration official.
This comes as part of a sweeping policy review designed to prevent the spread of atomic weapons.
The review "will point to dramatic reductions in the stockpile, while maintaining a strong and reliable deterrent," the official said.
He added that it will lead to a greater role for conventional weapons.
President Obama is to meet his defence secretary, Robert Gates, later on Monday to discuss the new nuclear strategy.
Officials say thousands of nuclear weapons could be cut, many by retiring weapons that are now kept in storage.
They say the new strategy will be an important step towards Mr Obama's declared aim of reversing the spread of nuclear weapons and seeking a world without them.
60
posted on
03/01/2010 8:22:49 AM PST
by
Mrs. Don-o
(ANTHROPOGENIC CONTINENTAL DRIFT: for when global warming isn't silly enough anymore.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-158 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson