Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Liberalism, Atheism, Male Sexual Exclusivity Linked to IQ
CNN ^ | 2/26/10 | Elizabeth Landua

Posted on 02/26/2010 2:39:36 PM PST by nickcarraway

Political, religious and sexual behaviors may be reflections of intelligence, a new study finds. Evolutionary psychologist Satoshi Kanazawa at the the London School of Economics and Political Science correlated data on these behaviors with IQ from a large national U.S. sample and found that, on average, people who identified as liberal and atheist had higher IQs. This applied also to sexual exclusivity in men, but not in women. The findings will be published in the March 2010 issue of Social Psychology Quarterly.

The IQ differences, while statistically significant, are not stunning -- on the order of 6 to 11 points -- and the data should not be used to stereotype or make assumptions about people, experts say. But they show how certain patterns of identifying with particular ideologies develop, and how some people's behaviors come to be. The reasoning is that sexual exclusivity in men, liberalism and atheism all go against what would be expected given humans' evolutionary past. In other words, none of these traits would have benefited our early human ancestors, but higher intelligence may be associated with them.

"The adoption of some evolutionarily novel ideas makes some sense in terms of moving the species forward," said George Washington University leadership professor James Bailey, who was not involved in the study. "It also makes perfect sense that more intelligent people -- people with, sort of, more intellectual firepower -- are likely to be the ones to do that."

Bailey also said that these preferences may stem from a desire to show superiority or elitism, which also has to do with IQ. In fact, aligning oneself with "unconventional" philosophies such as liberalism or atheism may be "ways to communicate to everyone that you're pretty smart," he said.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: babyboomers; darwinian; intelligence; iq; sex
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last
To: 724th
Is this her?


41 posted on 02/26/2010 3:34:46 PM PST by Rastus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Unfrotunately there is no way to measure common sense.


42 posted on 02/26/2010 3:39:16 PM PST by Gumdrop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ravingnutter

Worth repeating

“A high IQ is worthless without common sense.”


43 posted on 02/26/2010 3:44:25 PM PST by Psychodas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SolidRedState

“Intellectuals can convince themselves of anything because they are so little bound by the facts in front of their eyes.”


44 posted on 02/26/2010 3:55:01 PM PST by glasseye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sprite518

No one has taken into account the bias of those doing the research.


45 posted on 02/26/2010 4:30:08 PM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Sprite518

No one has taken into account the bias of those creating the tests.


46 posted on 02/26/2010 4:30:25 PM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

More likely to go to college = more likely to be brainwashed.


47 posted on 02/26/2010 4:38:53 PM PST by patriciaruth (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1993905/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

How fitting!

Romans 1:22

Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools,


48 posted on 02/26/2010 5:02:59 PM PST by DaveTesla (You can fool some of the people some of the time......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway; AdmSmith; Berosus; bigheadfred; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; ...

Thanks nickcarraway.

additional:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2460197/posts


49 posted on 02/26/2010 6:50:19 PM PST by SunkenCiv (Freedom is Priceless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

So John Edwards and Bill Clinton have low IQ!


50 posted on 02/26/2010 7:08:12 PM PST by JimWayne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dexter Morgan
The study is flawed. They asked liberal atheist men, “With how many women have you had sex?” The libs all responded, “One,” which the researchers interpolated to mean that they are sexually exclusive...

DING DING DING DING DING DING DING DING!

NO more calls, please.

We have a WINNER!

Cheers!

51 posted on 02/26/2010 7:10:02 PM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.<)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: prisoner6
This is the study.

Q. Was there a control group?

Q. It mentions "young people". Was it longitudinal?

Q. Young women sleeping around may correlate with a high IQ (I knew a girl in college who knew five languages and couldn't say "No" in any of them...) but it is not a favored trait for society unless the offspring are reared well.

Cheers!

52 posted on 02/26/2010 7:12:52 PM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.<)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: JimWayne
You forgot Tiger.

In other words, to quote the old Esso commercial,

"Put a Tiger in your Skank!"

Cheers!

53 posted on 02/26/2010 7:15:02 PM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.<)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

I did an IQ test a while back. There really is no conservative/liberal bias. I had a high score, but to be frank I really do not believe it. A single test is really not a good way to measure a person’s intelligence.


54 posted on 02/26/2010 8:57:50 PM PST by Sprite518
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

What crock of sh*t. If so, I must have been smarter in my college communist years. More bad science from pseudo intellectuals lacking in the ability of critical thinking. Another study where someone went out in search of evidence top support his conclusion. Like all poli sci and psychology these days, this crap is reported as “science”.


55 posted on 02/26/2010 9:12:01 PM PST by Cacique (quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat ( Islamia Delenda Est ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
NOTE THAT THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE POLITICAL TERMS AS WE KNOW THEM ...

The study takes the American view of liberal vs. conservative. It defines "liberal" in terms of concern for genetically nonrelated people and support for private resources that help those people. It does not look at other factors that play into American political beliefs, such as abortion, gun control and gay rights. "Liberals are more likely to be concerned about total strangers; conservatives are likely to be concerned with people they associate with," he said.

In short, it is NOT about political terms. They use some fuzzy markers and call it liberalism... Really bad.

And 'exclusivity' !?!?

56 posted on 02/26/2010 9:48:35 PM PST by WOSG (OPERATION RESTORE AMERICAN FREEDOM - NOVEMBER, 2010 - DO YOUR PART!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SolidRedState

London School of Economics is the Brit equivalent of the Council on Foreign Relations. All globalist pigs.


57 posted on 02/26/2010 10:34:08 PM PST by Luke21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Then why do the Democratic voting counties in various states have lower scores than the Republican leaning counties in various states?


58 posted on 02/26/2010 11:22:13 PM PST by TypeZoNegative (Pro life & Vegan because I respect all life, Republican because our enemies don't respect ours.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Acrobat

Ditto for me except for only one child.


59 posted on 02/27/2010 6:45:12 AM PST by reg45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: JTHomes

“If anything it is evidence that smarts alone are not correlated with smart choices.”
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

I think it shows the fallacy of believing that IQ tests are the sole yardstick of intelligence. I have known plenty of high IQ failures and I speak as someone who has tested in the top one percent. I know plenty of people who have accomplished much more than I have but couldn’t come within 20 points of my IQ score. I can show you a few who COULD match my scores but haven’t done nearly as well in life as I have. There is a lot more involved than what an IQ test measures.


60 posted on 02/27/2010 7:16:39 AM PST by RipSawyer (Trying to reason with a leftist is like trying to catch sunshine in a fish net at midnight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson