Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

RON PAUL should be the ZIONIST CHOICE for US President.
Arutz Sheva -- Israel National News ^ | 11/15/07 | Shmuel Ben-Gad

Posted on 02/25/2010 12:56:50 AM PST by Christian_Capitalist

Israel receives military and financial assistance, and also some diplomatic support at the United Nations, but the US puts pressure on Israel to surrender parts of the homeland... It seems to me a Ron Paul presidency would be good for Israel and for the United States. Its foreign policy non-interventionism and its concern to protect national sovereignty would provide Israel with a greater impetus to increase its own independence and sense of national honor. I hope American Zionists will resist the immediate, meretricious attractions of American financial assistance for Israel. Ron Paul would both end this infantilizing, and even corrupting, aid and respect Israel's national sovereignty. Taking the long and deep view, Ron Paul should be the Zionist choice."

(Excerpt) Read more at israelnationalnews.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Foreign Affairs; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2012gopprimary; crazyn00b; endthefed; fauxconservative; flapflapflap; icecreammandrake; islamofascism; jbs; jews; judaism; justgoawayron; kittychow; liberalshatejews; moonbatwings; obamahatesjews; palin; paulestinans; preciousbodilyfluids; randpaul; rino; ronpaul; ronpaul2012; rupauls; sapandimpurify; sarahpalin; supportisrael; truther; usancgldslvr; valhallaiamcoming; weareyouroverlords; youknowhesnuts; zionism; zot; zotmehard; zotmenow
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300301-304 next last
To: onyx; SoCalPol

Thanks for the enlightenment.

I never took Paul seriously enough to do a lot of research. His “positions” just seemed so odd.

Ever since CPAC, I’ve been scratching my head over Paul, “gays” (I really hate the fact that they ruined a perfectly good English word!) and other goings-on at that meeting.


261 posted on 02/25/2010 9:49:31 PM PST by shibumi (Health and well being for S. and L. - in Jesus name we pray!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 260 | View Replies]

To: shibumi

You are welcome.

Glad there are some on FR who have honest questions
and willing to be inormed.


262 posted on 02/25/2010 9:55:52 PM PST by SoCalPol (Reagan Republican for Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 261 | View Replies]

To: SoCalPol

s/b informed


263 posted on 02/25/2010 9:56:35 PM PST by SoCalPol (Reagan Republican for Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 262 | View Replies]

To: shibumi

I didn’t take Ron Paul seriously either. He’s a nuisance. I still don’t take him seriously, but his supporters are intrusive and quite rude and pushy. I don’t another way to to describe them. He’s not a serious contender, in that he can’t win but he sure can be counted on to be a distraction and a disruptive force.

Anyway, I’ve enjoyed our conversation. Thank you and good night!


264 posted on 02/25/2010 9:58:38 PM PST by onyx (BE A MONTHLY DONOR - I AM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 261 | View Replies]

To: SoCalPol

I know only what I know - and sometimes I’m not so sure of that. But some things I am sure of:

Salvation through Jesus.

Freedom through armed strength.

Free market is ALWAYS better than state controlled.

Dogs are better friends and more loyal than most people.

(There maybe a few other truths, but I’ll only think of them when they apply.)


265 posted on 02/25/2010 10:02:06 PM PST by shibumi (Health and well being for S. and L. - in Jesus name we pray!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 262 | View Replies]

To: shibumi

You have a good list.
But I would have to add cats to that.


266 posted on 02/25/2010 10:12:07 PM PST by SoCalPol (Reagan Republican for Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 265 | View Replies]

To: SoCalPol

On that note, we’ll say goodnight.

(OK? FRiends.)


267 posted on 02/25/2010 10:16:09 PM PST by shibumi (Health and well being for S. and L. - in Jesus name we pray!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 266 | View Replies]

To: shibumi
I would give this latest crop of Paultards, no matter how “Christian” or “Conservative” they claim to be.

Can you point me to the post that Christian_Capitalist made that you find most offensive?

268 posted on 02/26/2010 4:37:45 AM PST by Theophilus (Shall the throne of iniquity have fellowship with thee, which frameth mischief by a law?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies]

To: Theophilus

Then not only are you deaf and blind, but lacking in itellect as well.
Yes, I did prove it.
You just aren’t man enough to admit it.


269 posted on 02/26/2010 5:34:11 AM PST by Darksheare (Tar is cheap, and feathers are plentiful.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies]

To: Theophilus

Two minutes fifty five seconds into the video “Ira wants nukes because they feel threatened”
Right before that he’s talking about how they’re scared because we’re in the area.
DO the math.


270 posted on 02/26/2010 5:36:17 AM PST by Darksheare (Tar is cheap, and feathers are plentiful.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies]

To: darkwing104

‘blog pimp’
what is a blog pimp?
If a blogger wished to inform or show people on freerepublic an article or news item, in what section should it be shown? I selected ‘Bloggers and Personal’ because Since I was referencing a blog, it only made sense. The screen caps of the stories, I have found a necessary evil because often times the stories are pulled, leaving no way to view that which I referenced.
So maybe I am missing something here.
Could you please explain what the term indicates, and if it is something that is ‘not done’ then I will try not to do it again.


271 posted on 02/26/2010 5:37:08 AM PST by 51773photo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 224 | View Replies]

To: darkwing104; Theophilus

He doesn’t like his crow.
See his failed attempts to weave out of it at posts 215 and 225.Ron Paultards are so fun to mess with.


272 posted on 02/26/2010 5:37:24 AM PST by Darksheare (Tar is cheap, and feathers are plentiful.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies]

To: 51773photo; darkwing104

A blog pimp will usually post their article as an excerpt in the wrong forum, say news instead of bloggers and personal, and they will try to force their website ‘hits’ up by doing this.
This irritates all of us to no end as many times the excerpt has nothing to do with the actual content of the site you get directed to.


273 posted on 02/26/2010 5:48:27 AM PST by Darksheare (Tar is cheap, and feathers are plentiful.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 271 | View Replies]

To: 51773photo; darkwing104
And you already asked that question here.
274 posted on 02/26/2010 5:49:13 AM PST by Darksheare (Tar is cheap, and feathers are plentiful.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 271 | View Replies]

To: Theophilus; Allegra; darkwing104
Funny, you sure had your hands on your hips and your nose in the air in a huff over there.
Oh yeah, that's a link, you click on it.
But, just to be sure, that's post 177.. your post where you're in a huff.
Buddy, don't ever play stupid "prove it" games on me.
I'll eat your lunch.
275 posted on 02/26/2010 5:51:16 AM PST by Darksheare (Tar is cheap, and feathers are plentiful.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies]

To: Christian_Capitalist
Image and video hosting by TinyPic
276 posted on 02/26/2010 6:28:07 AM PST by b4its2late (A Liberal is a person who will give away everything he doesn't own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom; Sarah Barracuda; editor-surveyor; Virginia Ridgerunner; Allegra
Palin endorsed mccain so maybe FR should also go with him?

Very astute point that absolutely DESTROYS this poster's "reasoning". The Paultard Libertarians are grossly wrapping themselves in the Sarah Palin "blanket" and using her name for their nefarious and ulterior motives.

Note to Conservatives4Palin - This would be a perfect item for Sarah to put a clear, concise and pointed "rebuke" (tweet, Facebook, wherever) to this lame strategy by the Paultard Libertarians.

277 posted on 02/26/2010 7:38:52 AM PST by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Theophilus; Markos33; Darksheare; darkwing104; SoCalPol; onyx
"Can you point me to the post that Christian_Capitalist made that you find most offensive?

I object to the whole premise of his so-called political strategy, personified by this particular quote:

"If your hatred for the Paul Family, outweighs your support for Sarah Palin: then get out of my GOP."

"YOUR" GOP??? Not to mention that the attempt to necessitate support for the moonbats out of support for Sarah Palin is a specious arguement, at best.

To be clear, I have not made up my mind on a candidate for 2012, but if I happen to like a particular person, I'm not going to be boxed in by either RINOs or moonbats.

As I have shown earlier on this thread, I do not claim to know everything, and I am willing to listen - but I will *not* be lectured to, especially by someone who is logically inconsistent.
278 posted on 02/26/2010 9:59:19 AM PST by shibumi ("..... then we will fight in the shade.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 268 | View Replies]

To: shibumi; Theophilus; Markos33; darkwing104; SoCalPol; onyx

I liked a certain poster coming onto the thread at post 177 in a huff with their nose in the air and their hands on their hips to berate us about how we’re treating a moonbat.
And when Rand gets quoted about Iran, that certain poster goes, “Prove it”.
And when proof is posted and they have to eat crow, they turn around and do a Baghdad Bob!
Nevermind that the post they said “Prove it” to had a link to the information to begin with, thus proving that they cannot be bothered to check linked info.
They want it spoon fed to them as they don’t want to run down information for themselves.
People like that vote, and are too lazy to bother checking on things.


279 posted on 02/26/2010 10:11:59 AM PST by Darksheare (Tar is cheap, and feathers are plentiful.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 278 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare

I am not sure if what I did qualifies for membership in the Blog Pimp club. Often times, sites will pull their piece, and leave my ‘active’ link to it, as broken. I have been documenting Barry and his short comings since Nov 08 and found it necessary to copy, or convert said pieces to a format I can save. Such as catching Obama’s lie about not having had discussions with Blago about Blago’s choice in replacing Barry’s seat. Since I introduced the piece about the leak of radioactive materials with a comment or lead in,, I felt it would be best to insert it in the “Blogger and personal” forum which I did. I guess if I had not done an intro, then would it have been better to use the News and whatever Forum? So with this in mind, how much of what you said about blog pimp am I ‘guilty of’ and, again, what should I have done, in your eyes, to avoid being placed into some sort of negative light?


280 posted on 02/26/2010 11:19:39 AM PST by 51773photo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 273 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300301-304 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson