Posted on 02/25/2010 12:56:50 AM PST by Christian_Capitalist
Israel receives military and financial assistance, and also some diplomatic support at the United Nations, but the US puts pressure on Israel to surrender parts of the homeland... It seems to me a Ron Paul presidency would be good for Israel and for the United States. Its foreign policy non-interventionism and its concern to protect national sovereignty would provide Israel with a greater impetus to increase its own independence and sense of national honor. I hope American Zionists will resist the immediate, meretricious attractions of American financial assistance for Israel. Ron Paul would both end this infantilizing, and even corrupting, aid and respect Israel's national sovereignty. Taking the long and deep view, Ron Paul should be the Zionist choice."
(Excerpt) Read more at israelnationalnews.com ...
If the PaulBot trolls are allowed, I don’t see how anyother troll is zotted.
Next time, don’t ever dare to ask me to prove something and think I can’t.
Did you get the FR mail from the Paultard bradyjones this morning like several of us did?
My Candidate for President 2012: Lieutenant Colonel Allen West.
Especially when I’ve already given you a link to follow in the post you were responding to.
Yes. I asked the Admin Mod to ZOT him and the paultard spammer was gone soon thereafter.
Sure did.
It is getting old. Either this is a Conservative forum
or not.
Ron Paul on National Security and Foreign Affairs
holds the same fiews as the Far Left.
LOL
The Paultards must be scouring the threads to gather our names since we do not like him at all. I wonder how many are here. I think that guy signed on to mail the links to us. What a waste.
Perhaps you should read the troll's posting history and learn more about Rand Paul- Iranian apologist. Until then, criticism rejected.
Let me ask you one question.
Do you think FR should support the John Birch Society?
I have my own suspicions as to how the paultards get FReeper names. This isn’t the first occurrence of the “rupaul for president” FReepmail spamming.
Ooooh, this could get interesting.
Let me make some popcorn. :-)
2:20 Question (From an Iranian): What does Ron Paul think of the relations between the United States and Iran?
2:27 ...The rest of the field has said they won't even rule out using nuclear weapons aginst Iran.
2:31 He thinks it's a mistake, we should pull our navy back from their borders.
2:34 He's afraid an accident is going to happen and it's going to drag us into war.
2:35 He thinks the build up for war with Iran has already begun.
2:37 And all the discussion of saying that they are responsible for a lot of these weapons.
2:44 There have'nt been any congressional hearings, they is no public knowledge other than people claining these are Iranian weapons.
2:50 The other point is that Iran feels threatened because we have troops in Iraq and Afghanistan.
2:55 We don't want to say but I think the guy is a loose cannon. their President, but we have to understand their perspective, that they feel threatened.
3:09 But he (Ron Paul) makes that point that for 40 years we stared down the Soviet Union with 40,000 nuclear weapons.
3:17 that could actually hit us and still could devestate our country and we were able to do that without a nuclear war.
3:30 Could we not not stare down Iran if they could build one in ten years...
3:35 General Abizaid said the same thing...
3:37 We should encourage them not to get a nuclear weapon, we should really work hard in that way.
3:40 If they should get a nuclear weapon, I don't think we need to go to war with Iran...
3:45 Iran can't even make it's on gasoline...
4:05 Students (Iranian) are more Western and they are going to rise up and change the society...
4:15 If we go in and bomb the facilities the collateral damage will turn them and their families against us...
. 4:30 In the end we create more animosity towards us.
He never explicitly says that "Iran wants nukes because they feel threatened by us." and to say that he does is a lie. Don't just click the link, watch the video.
I guess he thinks of Iran like an angry dog that you know you can kill but you would rather avoid. It feels threatened by us - true. It wants nukes for multiple reasons - true. So what? Should we take over every non-nuke country in the world because they might we wasting and money time trying to get one? We can disagree with him, I do. But don't put words in the man's mouth.
Libertarian and Far Left
I don’t know because I hardly get on threads where he’s mentioned. It could be he goes after ping list holders.
Over the years, I have gotten FReepmails like that from Paulbots, who inevitably end up getting banned. I wonder if it’s the same person who just has a list he re-uses.
Who knows.
No why would I think that? FR is the best political forum on the web it does what it does and the Birchers do what they do.
I've read a little about the Birchers lately. John Birch was Chistian missionary and decorated American officer and hero who aided Jimmy Doolitle, The Flying Tigers and the OSS. The society named after him (after his death) became excessivley controversial after the founder, Robert Welch, circulated a letter calling President Dwight D. Eisenhower a possible "conscious, dedicated agent of the Communist Conspiracy" They are anticommunist. I don't know much more about them. I never met anyone that I knew was a Bircher. I guess I'd go so far as to call them co-belligerents.
Christian_Capitalist supports both Ron Paul and the JBS.
I had posted to someone else and CC posted to me. Our very brief conversation can be read here.
That’s an excellent link. Thanks.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.