Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Exclusive: Navy to Lift Ban on Women Serving Aboard Submarines
ABC News ^ | February 23, 2010 | DAVID KERLEY and LUIS MARTINEZ

Posted on 02/23/2010 11:15:53 AM PST by SloopJohnB

Women are a big step closer to serving on U.S. Navy submarines. ABC News has learned that the Navy has decided to lift the ban on female submarine crew members. Subs are one of the last places in the military from which women are excluded.

(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: agenda; bhodod; cluelessindc; dumb; idiocy; militarywomen; navy; pc; sink; submarine; usmilitary; usnavy; women
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-102 next last
To: SloopJohnB

So when does the love boat actually depart on it’s next cruise?


21 posted on 02/23/2010 11:24:36 AM PST by puppypusher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SloopJohnB

Sir,The tampons seem to have clogged the torpedo tube.


22 posted on 02/23/2010 11:25:16 AM PST by gitmogrunt (The stupidity of Liberal's never ceases to amaze me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marty62
My son was a submariner. doesn’t sound like a good idea.


The article says they're deployed for around 7 mos. I don't know how anyone can stand that. Do they get any breaks at all to get Vitamin D and sunshine in their systems? I think I'd rather be in the desert!....maybe.

23 posted on 02/23/2010 11:25:39 AM PST by Jessarah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: King_Corey

Hear the one about the gay whale who attacked a submarine?

He grabbed onto the end of the boat and sucked the seamen out.


24 posted on 02/23/2010 11:25:50 AM PST by Jewbacca (The residents of Iroquois territory may not determine whether Jews may live in Jerusalem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SloopJohnB
So one month into a deployment, under the ice, she has an ectopic pregnancy.
25 posted on 02/23/2010 11:28:16 AM PST by Pan_Yan (Is the sarcasm tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SloopJohnB

26 posted on 02/23/2010 11:28:40 AM PST by Jewbacca (The residents of Iroquois territory may not determine whether Jews may live in Jerusalem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SloopJohnB

I DO NOT agree with placing women on our submarines.

I’m a thirty year throw back, since I’ve never been a supporter of women in the military.

That’s my take on it, and I haven’t morphed it over time. I’m sure many people disagree with me.

That being said, I respect women for having served just as much as I do the men, but if I had my druthers, women would be out.


27 posted on 02/23/2010 11:29:00 AM PST by DoughtyOne (God, Family, Friends, Home, Town, State, the U.S., Conservatism, Free Republic & a dollar a day...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

For what it’s worth, I agree with you completely.


28 posted on 02/23/2010 11:31:19 AM PST by MaryFromMichigan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: puppypusher

the rest of the story:

...the new chickmarines will be painted pink with peace signs, torpedoes replaced by makeup chambers, massage parlors, bikini gear and sunning saloooons.
Supply of white flags with 0ooooohusssseeiiin pres..ent portarait.
Hollywood working on movies depicting how they disarmed the terrrorrrists with love.


29 posted on 02/23/2010 11:34:01 AM PST by Leo Carpathian (fffffFRrrreeeeepppeeee-ssed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: SloopJohnB

The navy term “hot bunking” will take on an entirely new meaning.


30 posted on 02/23/2010 11:34:22 AM PST by Banjoguy (Barack H. Obama and the Democrats are at war with the American people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SloopJohnB
As a retired Navy CPO with 26 years of service,albeit many years ago,I have asked myself the following question many times.

How does having women at sea manning a combat vessel improve the combat efficiency,or the good order and discipline,of that vessel?

I know the answer,but all I ever heard from the powers that be was the chirping of crickets. Just my humble opinion.

BTW the answer is...it doesn't.

31 posted on 02/23/2010 11:35:26 AM PST by oldsalt (There's no such thing as a free lunch.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MaryFromMichigan; DoughtyOne

That makes two of us.


32 posted on 02/23/2010 11:36:09 AM PST by Sister_T (Stealing from the rich to give to the poor is still stealing ... Exodus 20:15)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

I also agree with you. I cannot think of one instance where having women in the military has enhanced our capabilities


33 posted on 02/23/2010 11:36:47 AM PST by Rooivalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: SloopJohnB

The Navy is mixing gasoline (young men) and dynamite (young women) all while declaring that they have a strong policy against sparks (sex). Good luck, but we already know the outcome!


34 posted on 02/23/2010 11:38:31 AM PST by Tallguy ("The sh- t's chess, it ain't checkers!" -- Alonzo (Denzel Washington) in "Training Day")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pajama Blogger
Report fails to mention that only butt ugly chicks and bull dykes will be allowed in submarines.

Geez, that sure doesn't paint a good recruiting poster.

35 posted on 02/23/2010 11:38:41 AM PST by red tie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

Comment #36 Removed by Moderator

To: SloopJohnB

37 posted on 02/23/2010 11:40:30 AM PST by NativeNewYorker (Freepin' Jew Boy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NativeNewYorker

I think those guys prefer “Sea Men.”


38 posted on 02/23/2010 11:41:10 AM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: SloopJohnB

Another stupid idea from this government. STS2/SS


39 posted on 02/23/2010 11:42:02 AM PST by bmwcyle (Free the Navy Seals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SloopJohnB

Somebody has to clean and cook!


40 posted on 02/23/2010 11:44:26 AM PST by Pajama Blogger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-102 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson