Posted on 02/22/2010 5:58:22 PM PST by Pharmboy
An Israeli archaeologist said Monday that ancient fortifications recently excavated in Jerusalem date back 3,000 years to the time of King Solomon and support the biblical narrative about the era.
If the age of the wall is correct, the finding would be an indication that Jerusalem was home to a strong central government that had the resources and manpower needed to build massive fortifications in the 10th century B.C.
That's a key point of dispute among scholars, because it would match the Bible's account that the Hebrew kings David and Solomon ruled from Jerusalem around that time.
While some Holy Land archaeologists support that version of history including the archaeologist behind the dig, Eilat Mazar others posit that David's monarchy was largely mythical and that there was no strong government to speak of in that era.
Speaking to reporters at the site Monday, Mazar, from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, called her find "the most significant construction we have from First Temple days in Israel."
"It means that at that time, the 10th century, in Jerusalem there was a regime capable of carrying out such construction," she said.
(Excerpt) Read more at npr.org ...
bump
read later
Archeologist Eilat Mazar, center in red, who is leading the excavation of newly discovered fortifications outside the Old City walls, talks to journalists in Jerusalem, Monday, Feb. 22, 2010. Mazar says ancient fortifications newly excavated in Jerusalem date back 3,000 years to the time of the Bible's King Solomon and offer evidence for the accuracy of the biblical narrative.
A journalist looks over newly excavated fortifications outside the Old City walls in Jerusalem, Monday, Feb. 22 2010. An Israeli archaeologist says the ancient fortifications date back 3,000 years to the time of the Bible's King Solomon and offer evidence for the accuracy of the biblical narrative.
If they tore down that big gold dome from the religion of garbage, then they might find more good stuff!
Jesus said, “And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil. For every one that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved. But he that doeth truth cometh to the light, that his deeds may be made manifest, that they are wrought in God” (John 3:19-21).
For the believer, this life is the worst they will ever have it, for all eternity.
For the person who dies in disbelief, this life is the best they will ever have it, for all eternity.
“others posit that David’s monarchy was largely mythical and that there was no strong government to speak of in that era.”
And yet I’m sure those same archeologists would have no trouble handing Jerusalem over to the Muslims because some traditions hold that Mohamed flew Buraq the magic horse there.
On NPR - the mind boggles.
Wow!
Well, they just picked up the AP story, but even then...quite a surprise, I agree...
Makes you wonder what their motive is.
Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn’t pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same.
...freedom cannot exist when it requires the permission of government.
Like maybe even the Arc of The Covenant.
AAAHHHH! Well said!! How right you are
Found it.
I wonder what the debate at NPR was like:
"It proves something in the Bible! We can't run that!"
"But it was a discovery made by a woman! We have to!"
Thanks :)
The Bible has no errors. Only interpretation is the problem. This is an exciting historical find.
Don’t tell the Moslems . . . it will make them crazy . . . er, crazier.
If youd like to be on or off, please FR mail me.
..................
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.