Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Does The Mount Vernon Statement launch a second revolution?
Ann Arbor Examiner ^ | February 18, 2010 | Kevin Fobbs

Posted on 02/19/2010 5:56:40 AM PST by Kfobbs

The conservative movement in America has been seeing its ranks grow steadily over the last year. The Tea Party Patriots and the growing support for Sarah Palin and her inspired leadership have energized people who are fed up with the direction our country has been taking. , But the momentous signing of “The Mount Vernon Statement” may herald the beginning of a Second Revolution.

Wednesday in Alexandria, Virginia, over 80 leaders representing tens of millions of conservative activists nationwide, signed The Mount Vernon Statement subtitled Constitutional Conservatism: A Statement for the 21st Century which is a declaration of leadership for a new generation of conservatives that defines the principles, values and beliefs of the conservative movement.

Consider the recent events predating the signing of the statement. Tea Party Patriots in Massachusetts rose up ...

(Excerpt) Read more at examiner.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: mtvernonstatement; sarahpalin; secondrevolution; teaparty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

1 posted on 02/19/2010 5:56:40 AM PST by Kfobbs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kfobbs
I find the statement pallid.

Two years from now, no one will be talking about it.

2 posted on 02/19/2010 5:58:39 AM PST by ClearCase_guy (We're all heading toward red revolution - we just disagree on which type of Red we want.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kfobbs
Yawn. Limp and not enough true leaders to make something of it.
3 posted on 02/19/2010 6:02:27 AM PST by mad_as_he$$ (usff.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kfobbs

LOL, the movers/shakers in the GOP are little different from the libs in regard to self valuation. They imagine themselves indispensable but real change will come from the electorate. The GOP would do well to consider that the folks in fly over country are tired of tone deaf pols who want to micro-manage from arms length in DC. There are plenty of this type in both parties. I think regular folks are telling DC they would prefer ‘power’ to be local where its easier to keep a thumb on it.


4 posted on 02/19/2010 6:04:50 AM PST by 556x45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kfobbs

No. It tells me that ALL of the “Mainstream””Conservative” orgs/people know how to glom on to a movement that they had VERY little with.


5 posted on 02/19/2010 6:13:54 AM PST by US Navy Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kfobbs

I’d like all candidates for the November elections as well as 2012 election to answer one question;

“What are YOU going to do to reverse the economic horrors that this administration has perpetrated?”


6 posted on 02/19/2010 6:15:06 AM PST by Roccus (POLITICIAN.....................a four letter word spelled with ten letters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kfobbs
Does The Mount Vernon Statement launch a second revolution?

LOL...

Will the lowest setting on your stove bring water to a rolling boil?

7 posted on 02/19/2010 6:15:14 AM PST by EternalVigilance (TATBO - "Throw All The Bums Out")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

From what I gather, it was an attempt to assert “conservatism”, ie, individual liberty with maximal freedom from gov’t involvement,

without addressing the necessity of individual virtue.

You can’t be a free AND amoral people. Choose one.


8 posted on 02/19/2010 6:16:02 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
Have to agree. We laugh at Obama for being all bluster without action, but many of these conservative literati have done little more than just that over the past 10-15 years. Throngs of anonymous tea-partiers, bloggers and town hall attendees have done more heavy lifting to revitalize the conservative movement and oppose liberalism in the past year than most of these signatories, individually or collectively, have done in the past decade.
9 posted on 02/19/2010 6:20:50 AM PST by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kfobbs
Well to be honest, I find the document to be an abomination. I think that the founding fathers wanted this to be a Representative Republic.

I don't think that we need to go any further than that.

Stick to the Constitution and don't screw with redoing the whole shooting match.

Just go back to the original design and stick to it. All these supernumerary departments can be disposed of and get us back on track.

10 posted on 02/19/2010 6:26:42 AM PST by SERE_DOC (My Rice Krispies told me to stay home & clean my weapons! How does one clean a phase 4 plasma rifle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SERE_DOC
Just go back to the original design and stick to it.

Isn't that just what the "Mount Vernon Statement" says?

11 posted on 02/19/2010 6:35:14 AM PST by John Valentine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Kfobbs

“Just words”.

LLS


12 posted on 02/19/2010 6:35:21 AM PST by LibLieSlayer (hussama will never be my president... NEVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kfobbs
Did someone at Mount Vernon declare independence, pledge their life/fortune/sacred honor, issue a call to arms?

So... what's the "revolution??"

13 posted on 02/19/2010 6:37:23 AM PST by DTogo (High time to bring back the Sons of Liberty !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SERE_DOC

I agree.....A constitutional republic.........


14 posted on 02/19/2010 6:41:39 AM PST by RRTJSP...........
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SERE_DOC

“supernumerary”

Ya learn something new every day on FR.


15 posted on 02/19/2010 6:58:17 AM PST by super7man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
They should call it by its full name

The Mt. Vernon Statement;
"A vague, nebulous manifesto" or "Why Republicans Lose Elections Because of the Their Failure to Communicate"

I agree with everything in it. I'd sign it, but it is so much flowery principle and so little practical that it can mean anything to anybody and so means nothing.

16 posted on 02/19/2010 7:19:14 AM PST by azcap (Who is John Galt ? www.conservativeshirts.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: azcap

I thought that something more detailed was needed (plus, I was already supporting the Twelve Points, anyway), but I’m wondering whether the others here who are unhappy with the Mount Vernon Statement just think (like I do) that it should have been more detailed or instead that statements of principle in general are useless. Some critics in other places seemed to have been asking for a platform or some other list of specific policy proposals. I think that with all of the confusion over principle in our movement, though, it would be a good idea to make sure that we’re all clear as to what our goals and principles are and then go back to talking about specific policy proposals. What does everyone think? Would something more detailed, like the Sharon Statement (or the Twelve Points), have been useful?


17 posted on 02/19/2010 7:39:32 AM PST by Duodecim (It isn't so much that liberals are ignorant. It's just that they know so much that isn't so. -Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

Agreed.

“Government sucks.”

My version is more accurate and doesn’t waste trees.


18 posted on 02/19/2010 7:51:58 AM PST by Mr Rogers (I loathe the ground he slithers on!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: John Valentine
respectfully, I don't believe it does.

I think it is an attempt to pacify those sitting on a fence but not really meaning to jump off.

The founding fathers risked everything, why should any less be required of those/us in the pursuit of restoring America?

Calling those who will destroy this country either by design or apathy, but the name that identifies what they are....

TRAITOR.

19 posted on 02/19/2010 8:16:01 AM PST by SERE_DOC (My Rice Krispies told me to stay home & clean my weapons! How does one clean a phase 4 plasma rifle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: azcap
"it is so much flowery principle and so little practical that it can mean anything to anybody and so means nothing. "

BINGO!

20 posted on 02/19/2010 8:19:07 AM PST by matthew fuller (Has the goracle seen his shadow yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson