Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tea Party Fireworks: Speaker Rips McCain, Obama, 'Cult of Multiculturalism' (Tancredo slams McCain)
ABC News ^ | 2010-02-04

Posted on 02/04/2010 11:01:00 PM PST by rabscuttle385

Ex-Rep. Tom Tancredo Suggests 'Civics, Literacy Test' Would Have Foiled Obama's Election; High-Priced National 'Tea Party' Convention Stirs Debate Among Factions.

BY STEVEN PORTNOY & JOHN BERMAN

NASHVILLE, Tenn., Feb. 4, 2010.

The opening-night speaker at first ever National Tea Party Convention ripped into President Obama, Sen. John McCain and "the cult of multiculturalism," asserting that Obama was elected because "we do not have a civics, literacy test before people can vote in this country."

The speaker, former Rep. Tom Tancredo, R-Colo., told about 600 delegates in a Nashville, Tenn., ballroom that in the 2008 election, America "put a committed socialist ideologue in the White House ... Barack Hussein Obama."

Tancredo did not stop at the Democratic president -- ripping McCain, R-Ariz., the 2008 Republican presidential nominee, for shaping up to be a repeat of "Bush 1 and Bush 2."

"Thank God John McCain lost the election," he said, voicing his belief that McCain would have presided over big budgets and lacked a tough stand against immigration.

Tancredo served 10 years in the House of Representatives and made a name for himself with his ardent opposition to immigration. He believes the 2008 election served to galvanize the right.

"This is our country," he told the crowd. "Let's take it back."

(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Arizona; US: Colorado
KEYWORDS: 2010; az2010; mccain; mccaintruthfile; notbreakingnews; tancredo; teaparty; teapartyconvention; teapartyrebellion
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-142 next last
To: Crim
Was it unconstitutional to give chrysler a loan in the 80s?

It is both un-Constitutional and just plain wrong to force one taxpayer to give another a loan, with the terms dictated by the Federal government.

21 posted on 02/04/2010 11:50:52 PM PST by rabscuttle385 (Purge the RINOs! * http://restoretheconstitution.ning.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: VicVega

Can you imagine having Juana McCain as the leader of the GOP until 2017 (due to having been elected in 2008 & re-elected in 2012)? YIKES!!!!!!!!!


22 posted on 02/04/2010 11:51:45 PM PST by ChrisInAR (You gotta let it out, Captain!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Crim
...."Was it unconstitutional to give chrysler a loan in the 80s?"......

Yes, unless you can show me article and section you find it in. Read article 1 section 8&9, and then Amendment 10. That explains what the feds can do and can't do. Anything else is BS.

Bailing out private business isn't listed.

23 posted on 02/04/2010 11:57:05 PM PST by chuckles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ZULU
Would the Feds loan tax-payer dollars to a private store-owner down the street to keep him from losing his business through poor management? I doubt it.

Actually the SBA (Small Business Administration) does have a direct loan program to loan taxpayer dollars to private business owners. They are not easy to obtain and the owner can certainly make poor management decisions.

24 posted on 02/05/2010 12:01:39 AM PST by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol

But do thye loan taxpayer dollars to private business which are failing because of poor business decisions?


25 posted on 02/05/2010 12:03:12 AM PST by ZULU (Hey Obama, how DO you pronounce "corpsman"?????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: politicket

until...

He sided with George Bush and voted to pass the stimulus bill.
+++++++++++++

Do you mean the TARP bill - the bank bailout? Stimulus 1 and 2 passed under bammy..


26 posted on 02/05/2010 12:04:42 AM PST by SeattleBruce (God, Family, Church, Country - Keep on Tea Partiers - party like it's 1773 & pray 2 Chronicles 7:14!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ZULU

In some cases, yes. Given the statistical odds that 3 out of 5 small businesses fail within 5 years, the odds are that the MAJORITY of loans go to businesses that make poor business decisions.


27 posted on 02/05/2010 12:06:37 AM PST by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol

That doesn’t sound like sound business to me.


28 posted on 02/05/2010 12:07:33 AM PST by ZULU (Hey Obama, how DO you pronounce "corpsman"?????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385; All
Tancredo's right.

.


29 posted on 02/05/2010 12:18:41 AM PST by Cobra64
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZULU

LOL - I dont think anyone would accuse the US Government of “sound business practices”.

But the bet that the government is making is that the 2 out of 5 that are successful, will bring in more tax revenue over time due to profits and taxes on employees than will be lost on the 3 businesses that fail.

Considering that the loss is only about $100,000 to $150,000 at most for each of the other three, you only need for each of the two businesses to provide a tax revenue of about $50,000 each year for 5 years to break even from a tax perspective.

In some cycles, the bet pays off. In other cycles it does not. However, these loans are not easy to obtain and most are not able to qualify for the full $150,000. Also, some will be wildly successful (2 of the 5) and one or two will be marginal. Meaning that they will survive for a couple of years and pay back some of the money. Others will be spectacular failures. Again, it is a bet that the government is making. The majority of time, it pans out and it can be argued that overall, the tax revenue picture is marginally better than if the government had not done anything.


30 posted on 02/05/2010 12:31:57 AM PST by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol

“They are not easy to obtain and the owner can certainly make poor management decisions. “

Unless you just arrived from India and want to buy a 7-11? :)


31 posted on 02/05/2010 12:51:04 AM PST by dljordan (Psalm 109:8 "Let his days be few; and let another take his office. ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

Go Tea Party!!


32 posted on 02/05/2010 12:57:35 AM PST by Jim Robinson (JUST VOTE THEM OUT! teapartyexpress.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZULU

As for Obama - the less said the better - he’s a Bolshevik.

Uh oh, you must be one of those believers in the “Bolshevik Conspiracy”, wording courtesy of the founder of the Bolshevik conspiracy, none other than “I am not a Bolshevik”, Barack Hussein Obama. Has a certain familiar ring, no? I did not have sex with that woman. Thanks to the enigma machine, we don’t need no stinking translation.


33 posted on 02/05/2010 1:10:45 AM PST by wita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385; All
Obama was elected because "we do not have a civics, literacy test before people can vote in this country." ______________________________________________________________

And the Liberals, Blacks and idiots of this nation elected a Commander in Chief who cannot pronounce the word "Corpsman"...he called it "Corpse-man" three times in one speech. Sean Hannity has the tape. It needs to be on YouTube.
34 posted on 02/05/2010 1:25:27 AM PST by no dems (Sarah Palin has more experience than B. Hussein Obama had.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

Hrm...so the Small Business administration is unconstitutional too then right?


35 posted on 02/05/2010 1:26:27 AM PST by Crim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

Finally some coverage by MSM of a true patriot speaking truth.


36 posted on 02/05/2010 1:33:21 AM PST by exnavy (may the streets run red with the blood of tyrants, and may the Lord have mercy on us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: politicket

Lotsa luck finding candidates more conservative than Tancredo.

Let us know how that works out for you. Hang onto that grudge against Tancredo, the bleeding heart commie (:rolleyes). It’ll serve us all real well.


37 posted on 02/05/2010 1:55:10 AM PST by chilltherats (First, kill all the lawyers (now that they ARE the tyrants).......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dljordan

LOL - so THAT is the ticket. That is what I’ve been doing wrong!


38 posted on 02/05/2010 1:56:35 AM PST by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385
Tea Party Conventioners....remember

THE MSM IS OUR ENEMY!!!

GIVE THEM NOTHING!!!

Accept no leader....we don't need one.
Let no one define us....we know who we are and what we are about. We do NOT need the MSM or self-proclaimed leaders to speak for us.

39 posted on 02/05/2010 2:01:36 AM PST by Roccus (ABLE DANGER?????...................What's an ABLE DANGER???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cobra64

Time to flush the RINO collaborators.


40 posted on 02/05/2010 2:13:49 AM PST by screaminsunshine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-142 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson