Posted on 01/16/2010 10:48:09 AM PST by Man50D
There’s one in every crowd...
No probs! I pray Tuesday will be a great day!
“Perhaps Barack Obama is uniting the country after all.”
I once told my two teenage sons...”If you two can’t resolve your differences, I will be your common enemy so you two learn to work together... Your choice!” It does work. A common enemy can unite the forces!
Is that the commercial that instigated the lawsuit? Think there was a thread about it yesterday.
~ What's the purpose of the TWO arrows?
~ If Brown can reward, so can coakly. There's nothing to stop either one of them.
~ Just because Brown can, does not mean that he did or he will. So what's the point of this ad?
~ Just like George W. Bush. George W. Bush what?!!! Finish the sentence!
How many trees were wasted for this useless mailing?
So, if you were a Mass. voter, you’d have voted against Scott Brown in the primary AND in the general election because he’s against partial birth abortion, for parental consent and parental notification?
I’m just trying to get this straight.
OMG!!!!! You mean 9/1 & 7/1 ratios respectlively? I never thought it would be THAT drastic.
I have learned a lot about Brown over the last few hrs after being on this thread, so I have to say that I would vote FOR him in the general. Now when it comes to the priimaries, I have no idea, ‘cuz I know even less about his primary opponents than I do of him.
And lookie at Scott Brown walking in the cold and shaking hands with his constituents. Not using unions and lobbyists so he can hide in the warmth of his office and buy his votes like MIA Croakley.
Last night on twitter, there was bunch of angry Martha supporters. They came in and started changing tweets and making it look like their opposition posted them that way. Racists words and the like. They were for gvmt funded abortions, free healthcare, big labor and gay marriage.
I went in and started blocking all the names. I could not believe the things these people posted. They were evil. One mentioned something about how Scott would have women die before he would allow them a abortion. Then something really dirty and how Scott hated women. Twitterers blasted this lady. Then told her Scott had girls of his own and how could they create such evil lies. But it didn’t stop.
I swear it is as if Obama’s team sent these people to all online social networks to destroy Scott. It was like a gate opened around 10 PM. They called themselves progressives,atheists and gay liberals. Their posts were scum of the earth. They did no favors for their cause. These group are what scare the beejesus out of conservatives so they never consider voting for their causes.
If Obama or Coakley thinks people like that will change people’s votes they are sicker than we know. Can that be?
Conservatives and Indies are the top % on all tweets for this race from what I read.
Get your Scott Brown avatar if you tweet.
Stronghold of the Orcs of the Left.
That's why they call it Massa-Two-Sh---- well, you know. See tagline. :o)
It’s UPS ...
Their slogan is “what can brown do for you ?”
So it’s obvious how cheap and cheesy Chokely is .. LOL.
I don’t know.
Starwise?
OH, UPS.
Thanks.
GMTA? I thought the same thing when I saw the picture!
The legality of abortion per se is not an issue in play at this time or in this campaign. The only things potentially up for grabs are
“Should baby-killing be a publicly funded part of ‘health care?’”
“Should young girls (minors) be able to abort their babies without parental notification and consent?” and
“Should health care providers be required to trash their own religious, conscientious, and ethical standards to keep their jobs?”
Coakley says “Yes, Yes, and Yes.”
Brown say “No, No, and No.”
Choose one. The time is three - two - one -NOW. I know who I would choose.
__________________________
:-)
As I clearly said, Brown is a BIG improvement over the former elected office holder as Senator of Mass.
I also said that I could understand if some Pro-lifer’s voted FOR Brown, considering the alternative (and the issues you’ve rightly pointed out).
And most clearly, I said I was NOT from Mass, so I won’t have to decide whether or not to support/vote for Brown.
Unlike some folks, the decision to vote for a candidate in these circumstances and with my views vs. Brown’s regarding unborn life, is something I would spend a good amount of time praying over and contemplating. If someone doesn’t support the protection of unborn life, or some kind of Constitutional amendment to end most or all abortions, or at least a restoration of the right of States to answer that question for themselves, then I can’t make a snap decision that “I know who I would choose.” My conscience doesn’t deliberate on an issue of such great issues at the snap of a finger.
As I said, fortunately, I don’t face that kind of choice in SC — yet. But I do pray for those in Mass., that they will make the wise and responsible choice...
Sorry if you took offense, but you know as I that most black Americans do not have or want good English language skills.
Please accept my thanks for making a better life for you and your family and for have good common sense to think conservatively.
Peace, friend. I know that you meant no harm.
And yes, I know that most blacks don't feel the need to speak standard American English, and that is a symptom of their not seeing the need or the benefits in joining the mainstream of American culture.
It's only white liberal guilt that has elevated some of these folks to positions that they could never hold, under normal circumstances.
Hmmm....Photoshop?
Why are there so many newbies here in the last week talking about this specific subject?
Do people really think that folks are going to vote for Coakley just because Brown isn’t 100% pro-life? At his website he CLEARLY states his position and the stuff I’m hearing from these n00bs tries to paint him as just as radical as Obama!
This is GOOD news — it means that there are some in the unions that do NOT always vote as they are told. It’s not as if the union endorsed Brown. In fact, Brown just filed an ethics complaint charging Coakley with using state resources and SEIU leaders to “urge” their members to vote for her...
I think you need to check out his website a little more thoroughly. I don’t know why people keep painting him as a liberal... I also find it interesting that you would use the word “progressive”. I honestly don’t EVER remember anyone using that word to describe RINOs before... Liberal, RINO yes, but not “progressive”.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.