Scott Brown vs the Marxist/mass abortionist B. Hussein Obama

Vanity | Jan 16, 2010 | Jim Robinson

[Jim Robinson]

Scott Brown says on his campaign website that the decision on abortion should ultimately be made by a woman in consultation with her doctor. This is wrong. Her doctor is no substitute for God in matters of life and death of an innocent person. The goal of abortion is to end the God-given life of an innocent and helpless person before he is even born into this world.

Our nation was founded on the self-evident truth that all men are created equal and endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are the Rights to Life and Liberty.

Abortion is not a right. In fact it wrongly deprives an innocent person of HIS God-given unalienable RIGHTS to Life and Liberty.

Government sanctioned abortion is an abominable sin and a crime against mankind and against the constitution and against the very bedrock foundational principle establishing our nation under God, i.e., that our unalienable Rights to Life and Liberty are granted by God, not man and not government and neither man nor government can deprive us of same!

I can understand the willingness of conservatives to overlook or downplay Brown's stance on abortion to the larger goal of denying Obama and his murdering Marxist Democrats their 61st senate vote and possibly killing their evil abortionist agenda, but we can't just wash our hands of the issue and walk away any more than we could wash our hands and walk away from any other mass murdering tyrannical government operation.

The unalienable Rights to Life and Liberty MUST be resurrected and reasserted as the fundamental God-given rights to every innocent person in America, beginning with the most innocent of all, the unborn, or NO other of our rights can ever be protected.

They say that the only way we can do this is by changing one heart, one mind at a time. Okay, then I'd say the place to start would be with Scott Brown. If you are going to give him your support, your money or your vote then you should DEMAND that in return he immediately changes his stance on abortion. If he is to represent us as a U.S. Senator he MUST be required to uphold his oath to defend, preserve and protect the Constitution of the United States, so help me God!

And this means he MUST be required to fully defend our unalienable Rights to Life and Liberty!

Support him if you must, but make the calls, write the letters, send the faxes, visit his office and make him realize that the unalienable Right to Life IS a constitutional right and abortion is NOT!!

Prayers for our nation and that we are understanding and abiding by God's will.

[Jim Robinson]

If he is a Republican senator and we are supporting him as Republicans, then he represents our official Pro-Life Republican party platform.

The Republican party is pro-Life or I’m not a Republican!

[MHGinTN]

Perhaps, just perhaps, Scott Brown is avoiding being pinned to the corkboard over abortion. But it is dishonest, and we have so embraced dishonesty in AMerica that we now expect it from politicians.

There is a way to view the issues regarding abortion which can bring a measure of clarity to them without polarizing. America has at its roots the notion of self-defense. And any physician presented a pregnancy has two patients to consider. In that light, defending life is paramount, but the woman must still have the right to self-defense decisions if the pregnancy continuing can drastically threaten her 'aliveness'. First, there are two humans, at least, when a pregnancy is presented, and secondly, the older human upon whom the younger is totally dependent must have the right of defending her aliveness. BUT, as science becomes more advanced and able to save the younger human via artificial means, that must be the option when the pregnancy continuing threatens to kill the older human.

Such heroic medical efforts will not be a part of any democrat fascist healthcare regime, you may be sure of that! Expedience drives the democrat party, and the acquisition of power over the people.

[Nextrush]

Scott Brown voted for Romneycare as a state senator as well.

He’s not right on some of the issues.

There’s obviously been a GOP insider fear campaign based on the Obamacare bill to gin up support for Brown.

I hope Brown wins because he’s the best of the three on the ballot, but that’s not saying a whole lot.

In other races to come, I would probably not vote for this kind of guy because my conscience wouldn’t allow it.

[libh8er]

I have only heard Brown say he ‘respects the current law’. He also said he is not running as a social crusader but an economic one. Whatever he believes on the inside, which I am sure is respect for life, the future of the country depends on this election and blockading the Marxist invasion led by Baraq Abdulmuttalb Hasan Obama.

[victim soul]

Thank you again, Mr. Robinson, for your honesty and speaking out for the least of our American children.

I will not vote for any candidate again who doesn’t obey God’s law first.

I’ll pray for Brown and his family though because
“A nation that kills its own children is a nation without hope.” Pope John Paul II

“It is a poverty to decide that a child must die so that you may live as you wish.” ~Mother Teresa

[madprof98]

Thanks so much for posting this. Obviously, FReepers are thrilled at the possibility of claiming “Ted Kennedy’s seat” for the people. But Brown is no more messianic than Obama was, and I personally would not vote for any candidate who considers abortion a human right. If Brown wins (as I hope he will), I think what we’ll actually get is a smarter, more attractive version of Olympia Snowe.

[onedoug]

Well met.

[Parley Baer]

“If Brown can kill this monster of a health care bill then he will have killed government funded abortion. It’s a start”

Exactly and how to look at this race.

[harpu]

Here's what the DemonRATs are sending out to raise money...

I just got up to Martha Coakley's campaign HQ to help her win Tuesday's crucial special election. I have to tell you -- this isn't like anything Massachusetts has ever seen.

It's happening right after the holidays, so a lot of people haven't even heard about it. Meanwhile, the same guys behind the Swift Boat ads are taking over the airwaves to distort Martha's record, and the same far-right tea-party crowd that's attacking President Obama is funding her opponent.

The stakes in this race are incredibly high. If we don't hold this seat, a right-wing Republican will hold Sen. Ted Kennedy's old seat until at least 2012 -- and we'll lose a crucial vote in the Senate for health reform and the agenda we fought so hard for last year.

That's why we're going all out in Massachusetts with a massive effort to lock up a Democratic victory. But we can only afford to keep this battle up against the far right through Election Day if folks like you chip in.

Please donate $5 or more to help us make Martha Coakley the next senator from Massachusetts.

Democratic ads are highlighting the key differences between Martha, a long-time public servant and one of the nation's best attorneys general, and her extreme Republican opponent who would walk in lockstep with Mitch McConnell and national GOP power brokers.

And our organizers are engaging volunteers by the thousands to make sure Obama voters make it back to the polls.

But we need your help to keep it going. Please donate $5 or more to the Democratic Party to support our work, including our efforts to elect Martha Coakley:

Let's win this,

Hari

Hari Sevugan
Press Secretary
Democratic National Committee

[mockingbyrd]

If Brown can kill this monster of a health care bill then he will have killed government funded abortion. It’s a start.

AMEN!

[loveliberty2]

Jim, it is well for you to make these points and remind voters that it is, after all, "We, the People," at the national level, who have the constitutional obligation and responsibility to make demands on those whom we support to serve us, and to persuade them of truly constitutional principles demanded of them if liberty is to survive. None is more critical than the fact that our Declaration of Independence and Constitution's protections are capsulized in this Jefferson declaration:

"The God who gave us life, gave us liberty at the same time: the hand of force may destroy, but cannot disjoin them."

A good example of the citizenry's obligation to persuade can be found in the story entitled, "Not Yours to Give," relating Congressman Davy Crockett's lesson received from a constituent farmer on what the Constitution required of him. According to Crockett, he changed mind as a result of that farmer's persuasion. The story can be read here

[livius]

You’re absolutely right. I don’t live in MA, but I guess if I did, I’d feel I had to vote for him because the Dems, as a party, are much, much worse.

But that said, I have already seen people using Brown as a poster-child for the RINO pro-abortion position. As in, “see, if you troglodytes just drop your opposition to abortion and get into the big tent, see how many more votes you’d get?” This is not true.

This is an unusual election at an unusual moment, and I can state with certainty that a lot of people - those of us opposed to abortion - wouldn’t even dream of voting for Brown otherwise. I don’t vote for pro-abortion candidates.

But as you say, perhaps the thing to do is to try to get him elected in order to prevent a worse evil, and then try to get him to change his position, certainly if he wants to be elected to something again in “non-special” circumstances.

[MHGinTN]

If a candidate once elected can change to more pro-life, which candidate is more likely to be open to the issues and moved to be more pro-life? ... HINT: Coakley is a dead soul democrat who sees absolutely nothing wrong with slaughtering the alive unborn as a right. Such a wicked soul is only hardened by more exposure to the Truth of the humanness of the alive unborn.

[Extremely Extreme Extremist]

Jim, let's not put the cart before the horse.

Brown opposes Obamacare. He opposes tax-payer funding of abortion, and supports abortion restrictions. He also will support pro-life judges.

I want to see Obamacare destroyed. Completely dismantled. If Obamacare passes, you are going to see unlimited funding and subsidies for abortion on demand.

Once Obamcare is destroyed, then we can nudge Brown to make the right decisions on abortion, and this is a special election, so if Brown turns RINO we can always support the true pro-life candidate in 2012.

80% rule Jim....alternative is Coakley.

[DoughtyOne]

Being so far away from Massachusetts, I don’t know all that much about Brown.

He has seemed to hit a few pretty decent notes recently. Is be really as bad as McCain? I would certainly hope not.

Jim and BOF, you guys are being realists. We’re in a tough spot. We need to be able to block the liberal agenda. Brown’s vote is vital.

He must win, and as Jim says, we must impress upon him what is right with regard to the unborn.

[Reagan Man]

Well said, Jim.

Aside from his opposing partial birth abortion, there is no difference between Scott Brown and Barrack Obama on the issue of abortion rights or Roe v Wade. None. Also, Brown's position on abortion mirrors other Rinos like Schwarzenegger, Giuliani and Romney. Throw in Brown's vote in favor of RomneyCare and you have another big government statist with an "R" after his name.

Grabbing away from the Democrats the Massachusetts Senate seat two Kennedy brothers held for 54 years, would be something to celebrate, but electing Brown will not put the Senate seat in the hands of a conservative. Whoever the voters of Massachusetts decide to elect, they'll be getting an abortion proponent. Candidates like Scott Brown are the enemy within and undermine conservatism. If a candidate can't defend our most fundamental Constitutional right to life, then that candidate (he or she) isn't someone worth supporting or voting for.

[Extremely Extreme Extremist]

but I am no fan of many of his political stances anymore than I am

What stances do you disagree with Brown on?

His abortion views are 10th Amendment libertarian and is surprising considering the state he represents.

He's pro-military, pro-small government, AND OPPOSES OBAMACARE.

IMO he's the most conservative candidate to come across the Northeast in decades.

[mkjessup]

An excellent thread Jim. It goes right to the core of the conflict between wanting to see the 0bamunist thugs and their pro-death agenda stopped, and having to make common cause with those who are not the strong pro-life advocates we would like them to be.

Scott Brown is unfortunately on the record as saying that the abortion issue “isn’t important” to him, and that he believes it is more important to focus on taxes, deficit spending, the abominable 0bamaCare scam, and it is my understanding that he stated that he would in fact have voted to confirm that witch Sotomayer for the SCOTUS but qualified that statement by saying that he would not want to see judges “legislating from the bench” (which is exactly what Sotomayer is infamous for).

I do think that Scott Brown is intelligent and logical enough to give due consideration to the possibility that his views on abortion are in conflict with the principles of our Constitution. He has daughters, he is a parent, from all indicators he is a good and responsible parent.

I view the contrast between Coakley and Brown as I would view the difference between two OB/GYNs, one of which devotes 100 percent of their time to murdering unborn babies in abortion mills all over the landscape, with the other OB/GYN who is delivering babies, providing medical care to both mothers and children, and regretfully performs abortions from time to time. Both are committing murder, but one doctor is a serial killer, the other is a reluctant killer only when in their mind, there is no other option.

Coakley is a rabid pro-abortionist and would be happy to have tea with albums of aborted babies to gaze at, with George Tiller’s advocate and friend, HHS Secretary (and former Governor of Kansas) Kathleen Sebelius. They are two of a kind, vultures of a feather. Coakley needs to be stopped cold, and I believe she will be this Tuesday.

I do believe that Scott Brown’s mind can be changed, and will be changed. With greater responsibility comes greater wisdom and insight (in some persons), I believe that will be the case with Scott Brown.

[Faith]

Government sanctioned abortion is an abominable sin and a crime against mankind and against the constitution and against the very bedrock foundational principle establishing our nation under God, i.e., that our unalienable Rights to Life and Liberty are granted by God not man and not government! And neither man nor government can deprive us of same!

I applaud this statement, Jim, and I'd love to see it listed with the other patriotic quotes on the bottom of the FR home page.

[Extremely Extreme Extremist]

Brown is far more conservative than Olympia Snowe.
We shouldn't even be having this discussion. Brown's abortion position is the same as Fred Thompson's before he ran for the Senate (and proceeded to get 100% pro-life rating). This statement from Brown doesn't discourage me in the least. He's pro-life in the context of the majority opinion held by Americans.