Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Boston Globe endorses Coakley (this is SAD, folks)
The Boston Globe ^ | 1/13/2010 | Editors

Posted on 01/13/2010 6:27:29 PM PST by GOP_Resurrected

People in Massachusetts are understandably frustrated. Next week's special election comes in the midst of a too-long Senate debate on health care, showcasing much of what is offensive about the rules of the Senate. The fact that a final bill hasn't even emerged has left many people ready to toss away the whole thing. Stir in the anxiety that comes with a still-faltering economy, and voters are angry.

Both major-party candidates for Senate reflect something of that mood. Democratic Attorney General Martha Coakley, after more than two decades in law enforcement, is no pie-in-the-sky dreamer. Thoughtful and empirical, she views issues like a lawyer building a case. She promises hard work and no illusions. And in some cases, that means scaling back the ambition of government programs to carefully monitor what works and what doesn't. Like the consumer-protection lawyer she is, she looks for measurable results.

Republican State Senator Scott Brown, who drives an old truck, channels voter skepticism more directly. Ignoring signs of improvement in the economy, he casts President Obama as the source of today's problems, and would give the Republicans enough votes to block, under Senate rules, anything Obama wants to do. Affable in person, Brown nonetheless seeks to be a terminator, stopping the Democratic domestic agenda in its tracks.

In Massachusetts, the expected result of a Senate election is a Democratic victory, so Brown wins points for being different. He even entices voters to give him a try, noting that they can toss him out after three years.

(Excerpt) Read more at boston.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bowtiedbumkissers; brown; coakley; scottbrown; senate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last
Yeah, shocker from the Globe. But I can pretty much promise you have NEVER read a hackish, kneepadded love letter like this from ANYTHING claiming to be a newspaper before. Professional Rat spindoctors can take tips from these authors.

Only plaudit I can give them as they at least admit their decision is thoroughly ideological:

Rarely has a pitch been more misleading. A vote for Brown is hardly a symbolic protest against congressional gridlock and the ways of Washington. It's a vote for gridlock, in the form of endless Republican filibusters, and for the status quo in health care, climate change, and financial regulation. That's what will happen if Brown gives the Republicans the additional vote they need to tie up the Senate.

1 posted on 01/13/2010 6:27:32 PM PST by GOP_Resurrected
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: GOP_Resurrected

The status quo in health care, climate change, and financial regulation.

Thats what I am praying for.


2 posted on 01/13/2010 6:29:20 PM PST by omega4179 (Marco2010)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Resurrected
"A vote for Brown is hardly a symbolic protest against congressional gridlock and the ways of Washington. It's a vote for gridlock, in the form of endless Republican filibusters, and for the status quo in health care, climate change, and financial regulation"

Sounds good to me. Go, Brown!!

3 posted on 01/13/2010 6:31:06 PM PST by hsalaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Resurrected
The fickle globe endorse Scott Brown for US Senate a few months ago. At that time they did NOT endorse Marfa Coakley.

I think for my choice I'll stick with their first endorsement.

4 posted on 01/13/2010 6:31:56 PM PST by C210N (A government big enough to give you everything you want, is big enough to take everything you have)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Resurrected

The NY Times (the Globe’s owner) endorsed Dinkins after the Crown Heights pogrom and a year where we averaged 6 murders/day. They’d endorse a side of beef if it had (D) after its name.


5 posted on 01/13/2010 6:32:37 PM PST by NativeNewYorker (Freepin' Jew Boy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Resurrected

It’s a vote for gridlock, in the form of endless Republican filibusters, and for the status quo in health care, climate change, and financial regulation. That’s what will happen if Brown gives the Republicans the additional vote they need to tie up the Senate.


I pray that is what will happen, otherwise a lot of senior citizens will die.


6 posted on 01/13/2010 6:34:24 PM PST by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Resurrected

they said the debate was a draw
NO WAY
She said KSM should get death but then states she is against the death penalty
she said no terrorists
we can’t win
her thugs attack a reporter and then is sent to FL away from reporters
she said she never saw the attack and yet a photo puts her there looking at the attack
she had no clue about the issues and even was getting confused about the talking points she was saying

and they endorse her

I just hope the good folks of MA wake up and realise how they are being taken for granted and fools.

we need poll watches with cameras as they are going to cheat big time on this

I’ve sent a video of the attack and a photo of her lying to them asking why are they not reporting this


7 posted on 01/13/2010 6:36:22 PM PST by manc (WILL OBAMA EVER GO TO CHURCH ON A SUNDAY OR WILL HE LET THE MEDIA/THE LEFT BE FOOLED FOR EVER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Resurrected

>She promises hard work and no illusions. And in some cases, that means scaling back the ambition of government programs

What a lying sack of feces. This obama fellatio leftwing
commiecrat will rubber stamp each and every money grabbing socialist whim the rats can offer.

Beyond sad....absolute rubbish!


8 posted on 01/13/2010 6:38:06 PM PST by soycd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Resurrected

I’m still amazed at how much it appears to be lost on most people in this country that the economic condition today really began after the 2006 election. What happened as a result of that election? Who took control of Congress? Who is responsible for the failures of the home mortgage crisis? Who is responsible for the crisis of the financial institutions? Who oversaw these areas? Who fought hard to change the lending rules that allowed people to obtain loans they should not have been eligible for nor could they pay back????? So, the Globe wants the status quo rather than a Senator that will help to end the deceit of the liberals destroying this nation.


9 posted on 01/13/2010 6:38:49 PM PST by SoldierDad (Proud Dad of a U.S. Army Infantry Soldier whose wife is expecting twins SONS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Resurrected

Reading the comments following the endorsement are great, however!


10 posted on 01/13/2010 6:38:53 PM PST by Daisyjane69 (Michael Reagan: "Welcome back, Dad, even if you're wearing a dress and bearing children this time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Resurrected

Gridlock..blessed gridlock. I would campaign on gridlock.


11 posted on 01/13/2010 6:39:59 PM PST by screaminsunshine (!!three if by government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Resurrected
C'mon, Coakley's thugs could have beaten down a reporter and the Globe would still endorse her.

Oh wait--that really DID happen. Continue on.
12 posted on 01/13/2010 6:40:51 PM PST by OCCASparky (Obama--Playing a West Wing fantasy in a '24' world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoldierDad

exactly

it went to crap when the Dem took over and the media ignore this.

there is so much to mention about Coakley and her lies in the attack and the debate along with what obama h as done with hsi radicals like Jennings who shows kids how homosexuals put a fist up another mans arse

the list could take an hour to print for others to read as there is so much


13 posted on 01/13/2010 6:43:10 PM PST by manc (WILL OBAMA EVER GO TO CHURCH ON A SUNDAY OR WILL HE LET THE MEDIA/THE LEFT BE FOOLED FOR EVER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: OCCASparky

Don’t you just love the smell of Democrap in the morning?


14 posted on 01/13/2010 6:43:14 PM PST by ully2 (ully)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Resurrected

This reminds me of the Post-Dispatch years ago when I subscribed. They could run stories with some facts in them about the negative effects of a tax on this or that, or the nefarious doings of a politician, but when endorsement time came around, they were for the tax hike, for the flawed politician, if he was a democrat.

So I, along with many others, won’t buy their newspaper, and they just go on and on. I want to see the crash into the wall in my lifetime.


15 posted on 01/13/2010 6:43:23 PM PST by Bahbah (Only dead fish go with the flow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Daisyjane69
Reading the comments following the endorsement are great, however!

About 15 pages of sheer entertainment. Even union people are busting her chops.
16 posted on 01/13/2010 6:43:56 PM PST by Thrownatbirth (.....Iraq Invasion fan since '91.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Resurrected

The Boston Globe is still being printed? </sarc>


17 posted on 01/13/2010 6:45:20 PM PST by massmike (...So this is what happens when OJ's jury elects the president....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Resurrected

Donate folks. We can win this. Lets Roll!

https://www.icontribute.us/scottbrown


18 posted on 01/13/2010 6:48:14 PM PST by RedMDer (Recycle Congress in 2010, 2012...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C210N

When did they ever endorse Brown? I’m a Daily Globe reader and don’t recall that.

Not doubting you but wondering when(and why) they would do that.


19 posted on 01/13/2010 6:49:36 PM PST by Mears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Daisyjane69
Reading the comments following the endorsement are great, however!

Yeah, the comments are all excellent (at least on the first page of comments). On the one hand it's encouraging to see that nobody is buying the Democrat Globe's justification for endorsing Coakley, but on the other hand it is disppointing that so many people have bothered to read the Democrat Globe's endorsement rather than just ignore it or laugh it off.

20 posted on 01/13/2010 6:50:22 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson