Posted on 01/12/2010 7:50:15 PM PST by rxsid
Edited on 01/13/2010 2:21:33 PM PST by Jim Robinson. [history]
As can be seen from Obama
(Excerpt) Read more at thepostemail.com ...
"UIPA REQUEST CONFIRMS QUIP, EXPLAINS MULTIPLE ORIGINAL VITAL RECORDS OF BARACK OBAMA" (Steve Dunham)
An intrepid citizen-researcher has confirmed that the man who goes by the name “Barack Hussein Obama II” has an original vital record kept by the Hawaii Department of Health which bears the name “Steve Dunham.”
//
PING!
Watched video. He doesn’t say ‘Steve Dunham’.
book mark
Good grief. So now we get to wonder whether his real name is Barry Soetero, Barack Hussein Obama, or Steve Dunham.
What next?
Godzilla?
We still don’t know whether Stanley Ann was married to Obama or not. This article seems to suggest that she was not, since polygamous marriages were only permitted in colonial Kenya among the natives, and Stanley Ann didn’t qualify. Therefore any marriage would have been bigamous and void.
Complication after complication. But I can well believe that Steve was born in the Coast Province.
Did you link the wrong video? No name mentioned of Steve Dunham at 5:55 mark.....
So, let’s see here.... it’s Barak Insane Obama, aka Barry Soetero, aka Steve Dunham, aka the commie filth with whom I’d like to mop the floor. Got it!
The citizen-researcher began her quest following a comment made by Obama at
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xk5YJkhizRs&feature=player_embedded
As can be seen from Obama’s own mouth, at about 5:55 into the above video, he clearly says that his name is Steve.
Nope, he doesn’t. Don’t know where they got that info.
So we finally have a president named Steve.
From the article:
"As can be seen from Obama’s own mouth, at about 5:55 into the above video, he clearly says that his name is Steve."
Although, I don't hear him say "Steve", either, around the 5:55 mark.
mark. ???????????????? ........
Just proves that zero’s a lieing bastard.
It’s from the Alfred E. Smith dinner (comedic, self-deprecating humor) and he never says anything about his name being Steve. This is ridiculous.
throwshoesatobama says:
Tuesday, January 12, 2010 at 10:47 PMI apologize for posting again and you can kick me out if you want John. But could it be under ‘Steven’? I know this would be splitting hairs but I would put nothing past the HI DOH.
——————-
Mr. Charlton replies: In intrepid researcher’s actual request was for “Steve Dunham”, “Steven Dunham”, and “Stephen Dunham.” So to answer your question, no. I did not mention this detail in the article, but I should have…
I listened to the last minute, and no Steve. This is ridiculous.
Agreed. See my follow-up post’s at 12 and 16. Also, the comment that he doesn’t say “Steve” on the video has been posted in the P&E comments section....awaiting moderation.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.