Skip to comments.
Fur-Free, Fabulous And Fuming: White House Objects To PETA's Image of Michelle Obama...
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/unleashed/2010/01/furfree-fabulous-and-fuming-white-house-objects-to-petas-image-of-michelle-obama-in-new-antifur-ad.html ^
Posted on 01/05/2010 5:43:49 PM PST by Steelfish
Fur-Free, Fabulous And Fuming: White House Objects To PETA's Image of Michelle Obama In New Anti-Fur Ad
January 5, 2010 [Pic in URL]
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals certainly meant it as a compliment when the group called First Lady Michelle Obama "Fur-Free and Fabulous" in its latest ad campaign. But the group's intentions apparently don't matter much to the White House, which says Mrs. Obama's image was used by PETA without her permission.
The ad, which features the first lady alongside Oprah Winfrey, Tyra Banks and Carrie Underwood -- all famous women who have refused to wear real fur -- was rolled out by PETA last week and can be seen, so far, at Washington, D.C.-area Metro stations and on the group's website.
"By rejecting fur, these style icons demonstrate to the world that fur is old-fashioned and cruel," PETA senior vice president Dan Mathews said by way of an introduction for the new ad campaign. PETA co-founder and president Ingrid Newkirk told the Associated Press that the group wouldn't have attempted to get Mrs. Obama's consent to use her image because it knows she would be unable to make such an endorsement.
(Excerpt) Read more at latimesblogs.latimes.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: boobbelt; fashionpolice; firstwookie; fur; furfree; michelleobama; obama; peta; sasquatch; wookie
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
"these style icons" Michelle? Oprah? Defining style down.
1
posted on
01/05/2010 5:43:50 PM PST
by
Steelfish
To: Steelfish

Yeah, she walks in beauty...
2
posted on
01/05/2010 5:45:52 PM PST
by
freedumb2003
(Communism comes to America: 1/20/2009. Keep your powder dry, folks. Sic semper tyrannis)
To: Steelfish
Positively scandalous to characterize MO as fabulous...
3
posted on
01/05/2010 5:46:03 PM PST
by
Hegemony Cricket
(The emperor has no pedigree.)
To: freedumb2003
She's a classic beauty.
4
posted on
01/05/2010 5:49:40 PM PST
by
cripplecreek
(Seniors, the new shovel ready project under socialized medicine.)
To: Steelfish
IBFWI
(in before furry Wookie images)
To: freedumb2003
6
posted on
01/05/2010 5:51:15 PM PST
by
freekitty
(Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
To: Steelfish
Fur free?!?!?!
7
posted on
01/05/2010 5:51:24 PM PST
by
Joe 6-pack
(Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
To: cripplecreek
8
posted on
01/05/2010 5:52:21 PM PST
by
freedumb2003
(Communism comes to America: 1/20/2009. Keep your powder dry, folks. Sic semper tyrannis)
To: Steelfish
She's only fur-free some of the time.
9
posted on
01/05/2010 5:52:26 PM PST
by
paulycy
(AMERICA: Less safe. Less free. More broke.)
Comment #10 Removed by Moderator
To: Steelfish
She’s pissed cause these idiots don’t realize HER fur IS real.
11
posted on
01/05/2010 5:55:46 PM PST
by
bigheadfred
(Be who you are and say what you feel: Those who mind don't matter.Those who matter don't mind.)
To: Steelfish
"the group called First Lady Michelle Obama "Fur-Free and Fabulous" Before:

After:
12
posted on
01/05/2010 5:56:38 PM PST
by
Cobra64
To: Steelfish
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals certainly meant it as a compliment when the group called First Lady Michelle Obama "Fur-Free and Fabulous" in its latest ad campaign. But the group's intentions apparently don't matter much to the White House, which says Mrs. Obama's image was used by PETA without her permission. I wonder if that would be the same wording, if a conservative group had done something like this, maybe a prolife group or the NRA, or an Arugula preservation group, or an anti-porn, or anti gay marriage group.
13
posted on
01/05/2010 5:56:44 PM PST
by
ansel12
(anti SoCon. Earl Warren's court 1953-1969, libertarian hero, anti social conservative loser.)
To: Steelfish
Something tells me that the First Wookie is a fur-bearin’ critter!
To: cripplecreek
Interesting.
Mona Lisa’s face is bigger on her right, stressing the feminine.
15
posted on
01/05/2010 6:00:58 PM PST
by
fanfan
(Why did they bury Barry's past?)
To: Steelfish
16
posted on
01/05/2010 6:12:03 PM PST
by
SkyDancer
(I Believe In The Law Until It Interferes With Justice)
To: Steelfish
..these style icons demonstrate.. Every time I read the MSM insisting MO is some kind of Fashion/Style icon I get these images for a Pig Party and a group of Washington DC blue blood elites sitting together laughing.
17
posted on
01/05/2010 6:16:58 PM PST
by
WesternPacific
(Deafness has its Advantages)
To: Joe 6-pack
We all know who wears the pants in the Obama household. She looks and acts much more masculine then he does. There probably is a reason for that.
18
posted on
01/05/2010 6:19:32 PM PST
by
peeps36
(Democrats Don't Need No Stinking Input From You Little People)
To: Steelfish
Black widow spiders DO have fur.
To: Steelfish
well, suck it up, Michelle honey - as First Wife your image is public property (I’d have said ‘lady’ but we know you’re not)
20
posted on
01/05/2010 6:21:41 PM PST
by
blueplum
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson