Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Atheist author tells of disgust after America’s religious right halts Compass movie follow-ups
WALES ON LINE ^ | DEC 16TH | DARREN DEVINE

Posted on 12/16/2009 12:14:03 AM PST by Brugmansian

ATHEIST author Philip Pullman yesterday spoke of his “disgust” at the triumphalism of America’s religious right following its successful campaign to sideline attempts to dramatise the last two books in the writer’s His Dark Materials trilogy.

Actor Sam Elliott, who starred in the film version of the first novel The Golden Compass, that grossed £230m, says a campaign by conservative Catholics has halted plans to complete the trilogy.

(Excerpt) Read more at walesonline.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News
KEYWORDS: atheist; catholic; goldencompass; hisdarkmaterials; hollywood; philippullman; pullman; thegoldencompass
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 next last
To: Brugmansian

If they made 230 million globally, what’s stopping them from filming whatever they want to film? Just don’t expect to make much money in a country where the majority of people still identify themselves as Christians.


21 posted on 12/16/2009 12:55:30 AM PST by skr (May God confound the enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skr

Yeah..seemed odd to me. They made a profit. Why not go on?


22 posted on 12/16/2009 1:00:59 AM PST by Brugmansian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Brugmansian

>> Why not go on?

A convenient excuse to avoid making another film.


23 posted on 12/16/2009 1:03:10 AM PST by Gene Eric (Your Hope has been redistributed. Here's your Change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude

You have to remember that only 50-60% of the gross goes to the studio, the rest goes to the theaters/distributors.

So only you take off the 40-50% off the total gross, and add in the promotion/advertising costs, the movie lost money. Which is why there is not going to be a sequel. It has nothing to do with Christians halting his movie. Although they may have done so by refusing to go see it.


24 posted on 12/16/2009 1:06:55 AM PST by Truthsearcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: skr
what’s stopping them from filming whatever they want to film?

Reminds me of an updated old WWI song, "Good Bye, Broadway; Hello Bollywood!

25 posted on 12/16/2009 1:14:10 AM PST by ApplegateRanch (Islam: a Satanically Transmitted Disease, spread by unprotected intimate contact with the Koranus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Truthsearcher

Yup, Pullman is just mad that God via Narnia kicked arse against Athiesm. The childish world view of Athiests shows up in so many different ways.


26 posted on 12/16/2009 1:15:52 AM PST by HerrBlucher (Jail Al Gore and the Climate Frauds!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Brugmansian
They made a profit. Why not go on?

Message aside, the books get worse and more boring IMO.

27 posted on 12/16/2009 1:16:48 AM PST by paulycy (Demand Constitutionality.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude
So it made a profit, but it’s not clear what the marketing budget and additional costs were to get that kind of foreign gross. Usually the marketing budget is half the production budget. Even so, a movie that does that poorly in the US is a risk.

Worldwide Marketing budget is usually about the same as production costs when all is said and done, 'cause they add dubbing foreign languages or subtitling... so, figure total costs of $360 Million... So net before taxes of $82 mil... nothing to Sneeze at... but given the risks of sequelitis... I can see the antsy ness of investors. 11% return after taxes on the original might not translate to sequel 1 or 2.

28 posted on 12/16/2009 1:25:50 AM PST by Swordmaker (Remember, the proper pronunciation of IE isAAAAIIIIIEEEEEEE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Brugmansian

it cost so much to make that even if it did earn 230 million, it isn’t enough to make a profit.

And since when do “conservative Christians” rule the movie market?

The dirty little secret is that EWTN and other markets pointed out that part one of his trilogy was fairly benign, with only broad hints against the church...but the story got more obvious and anti God/anti Catholic in part two and three.


29 posted on 12/16/2009 1:37:47 AM PST by LadyDoc (liberals only love politically correct poor people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brugmansian

In contrast, “The Passion of the Christ” grossed north of $611M in worldwide box office (not rentals, just theater tickets) despite
- outright bans in some countries
- produced in a language spoken only in a small obscure region
- being funded entirely from the director’s pocket
- vying for most violent movie ever (PGs tend to earn far more than hard-R)


30 posted on 12/16/2009 1:56:16 AM PST by ctdonath2 (It from fit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brugmansian
He said: “Jesus said all kinds of stuff that I’m a complete supporter of. If the Church had taken notice of what Jesus had said the world would be a much better place.

There is some truth to this, but he gets the cause backward when he lays the blame for the dark times of the church on the belief in the divinity of Christ.

Certainly Martin Luther had a more profound belief in Jesus as Lord then the corrupt church leadership who were selling indulgences and worse.

31 posted on 12/16/2009 2:07:51 AM PST by AndyTheBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2

Excellent point. Kind of takes the wind out of the poor persecuted atheist line.


32 posted on 12/16/2009 2:09:29 AM PST by AndyTheBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: ApplegateRanch

Apparently you are unfamiliar with Bill Donahue. Read the entire story.


33 posted on 12/16/2009 2:25:52 AM PST by malkee (Actually I'm an ex-smoker--more than three years now -- But I think about it every day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Brugmansian

as if Hollywood gives a rats ass what is offensive to Christians, let alone Catholics


34 posted on 12/16/2009 2:34:19 AM PST by sten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ABQHispConservative

That’s what the author is crying about. May have to pay for something himself.


35 posted on 12/16/2009 2:36:31 AM PST by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ABQHispConservative

They know that they will lose money on it.


36 posted on 12/16/2009 2:42:09 AM PST by Scotsman will be Free (11C - Indirect fire, infantry - High angle hell - We will bring you, FIRE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude

Those numbers don’t show a profit - gross is the ticket receipts AFAIK. The theatres have to take their cut.


37 posted on 12/16/2009 2:47:28 AM PST by chuck_the_tv_out ( <<< click my name: now featuring Freeper classifieds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude

It used to be huge blockbusters cost $100 million to make, now any little tinpot anti-Christian film gets nearly a fifth of a billion dollars?


38 posted on 12/16/2009 2:48:53 AM PST by chuck_the_tv_out ( <<< click my name: now featuring Freeper classifieds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Brugmansian

This book, triology or whatever this thing may be called is totally ANTI - God.... if people do NOT wish to spend their money on this then so be it.

Even in the type of world we live in today, evil does not always prevail there is good still among us.

Most of all parents, ALWAYS check out these books and movies before allowing your children to see them.

MERRY CHRISTMAS EVERYONE!


39 posted on 12/16/2009 3:28:45 AM PST by Paige ("All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing," Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brugmansian

If his work was good enough to make it in the marketplace of ideas it would have made it. There are plenty of atheists out there to buy anti-religion work. He has only himself to blame for not getting a wider audience.


40 posted on 12/16/2009 3:44:26 AM PST by DemonDeac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson