Posted on 12/09/2009 4:35:10 AM PST by Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) declare carbon a toxic pollutant Obama pulls end run
As I wrote here yesterday, I believe the feeding frenzy currently taking place at the Copenhagen trough will result in the ultimate global governance of every man woman and child on the planet. A climate treaty may not actually be signed and agreed upon by the 192 countries whose representatives are currently living LARGE on caviar and limousines at the conference, but the rules such a treaty might impose will still take effect.
The main reason to believe this will happen is that President Barack Obama has pulled an end run around the American people and the legislators they have elected by having the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) declare carbon a toxic pollutant, despite the fact that all life on the planet is basically carbon-based. But fascists can never be swayed by facts and Obama has shown that when it comes to imposing his draconian agenda he isnt particularly squeamish about violating the principles of the Constitution or the rights of the people.
(Excerpt) Read more at canadafreepress.com ...
Compliance and Enforcement
You'll always owe taxes, but instead of letting the government hold on to your weekly taxes, hold on to them yourself. Get it? No matter who holds on to them, you'll still owe the same. The only losers are the politicians because of their loss of interest on that money. YOU collect the interest instead.
Things are getting heated, they have to see it but just don't care.
We are pushing the EPA to reveal the data they used to justify their endangerment proposal. We need to drop the articles of faith and use the entirety of scientific study on the effects of climate change not a sub-set, chosen by the EPA not for its validity but rather on its ability to forward their policy goal the regulation of greenhouse gas emissions. The agency used secondary scientific sources, studies that largely werent adequately peer-reviewed and the selective use of scientific studies to justify a policy decision they wanted to make. There are many questions to be asked of the EPA, and forgive the Chamber for not accepting Trust Us as an answer. To enact effective policy we need transparency and scientific data which is beyond question, not data deemed beyond questioning.
More on our efforts for transparency here
http://www.chamberpost.com/2009/06/transparency-science-and-the-epa.html Congress, not the EPA, is the appropriate authority to deal with such a complex regulatory issue that needs and deserves transparency and rigorous public debate. We urge you to take quick action to help us stop EPA from moving forward with these regulations and to let Congress continue to address the issue.
The EPAs proposed rule is subject to a 60-day comment period, which ends on December 28, 2009. Please add your digital signature to the letter below and post a comment as to why you oppose this move by the EPA. At the end of the comment period, we will submit the letter and comments to the EPA as part of the official record. Every signature matters.
National Association of Manufacturers
http://namissvr.nam.org/minisites/EPA/index.aspx
BRAVO!!!!!!!!!!!
http://www.chamberpost.com/2009/06/transparency-science-and-the-epa.html
The truth will prevail, it may be a long cold bitter end but it will prevail.
IMPEACH OBAMA,GORE,CLINTON,AXELROD,RAHM and the entire corrupt administration trying to seize communist control over the United States of America!
Okay trees, sorry, but the air you need to survive has been declared a toxic pollutant. Nice knowing ya.
What a shame you won’t be turning that into oxygen any longer.
Ah, who need oxygen anyway...
Which one of Obama’s Czar’s believes in trees being able to sue humans? This may be around the corner.
Yes, but what would they sue for, more CO2?
Course with this lot, you never know.
They’ve switched from tree huggers to tree muggers.
http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/secondhandsmoke/2009/07/30/obama-science-adviser-trees-should-be-allowed-to-sue-babies-not-yet-human-beings/
If it were not for this tree where would this little girl be?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2yNw6DFOAUg
Why doesn’t Al Gore leave the line of getting $1200 to shake his hand and take the little girl out of the tree?
Yes, that’s about it. Noah, the serial killer... in your new Obama version Bibles due out next spring.
Well, for one thing, there was no tree. There was no water. There was only the little child’s bedroom, and the fears instilled in her by grownups who preyed upon her.
Al Gore is chief among them.
That’s why he can get $1200 per handshake in the first place.
Greed and power, Al Gore’s main staple.
Good luck surviving w/o sugars, starches or proteins.
Thanks for turning my smartassness back into reality of facts.
But I still wonder who will stop the little girl from hanging on a tree.
O B A M A?
>Obama the dictator. Who will stop him? So far, nobody.
The 2nd Amendment (and the founding fathers) would suggest Smith & Wesson, Winchester, Remington, et al.
I say we make a machine that can remove all of the carbon from a human being.
We can then start the process with removing all of the carbon from global warming environmentalists bodies...
I think it would be a swell program.
“The 2nd Amendment (and the founding fathers) would suggest Smith & Wesson, Winchester, Remington, et al.”
It may indeed come to that. If it does, Obaba and his communist regime is toast.
>Hes ineligible. Once thats proven, none of the rest of it matters.
Oh, you’re very wrong: ALL of the Congress that validated the elector’s votes for Obama, the USSC who denied standing to EVERYONE who brought the issue to their attention, the particular Justice who swore Obama in could/should be charged with: Treason, Fraud, Negligence.
Furthermore, the Democratic party itself could/should be charged with fraud, for endorsing and ‘validating’ a fraudulent candidate.
IE: if this gets out, we have a undeniably legally valid and morally obligated right to DESTROY all three branches of government, or rather those who occupy them.
COP15 Proposals summary from AEP simulcast from Copenhagen today
(Americans for Prosperity) http://www.americansforprosperity.org/national-site
COP15 Proposals:
- Western Economic Tax of 2% of GDP
- Removal of IP/Patent Rights for New Technology
- US Constitution is only paper, so Copenhagen Treaty as been renamed an Agreement so Obama can sign it on Friday
- Words worldwide government has been dropped from the Treaty; but there are 700 new global gov entities created
- The Treaty contains extensive, significant details (currently not being reported) on establishment of worldwide government
EPA Endangerment Finding:
- Covers 100% of McDonalds (any fast food restaurant)
- Covers all Mining, Cement Plants, PetroChemical Plants, Refineries, Trains, Shipping, Long-haul Trucks
- Covers all Manufacturing sites of any size
- Covers all Buildings in the US of moderate size and larger which use natural gas or heating oil for winter heat
- Unions are advocating global welfare for the millions who will become unemployed during this necessary economic transition period
Rick Perry:
- 400,000 jobs will be lost in Texas from EPA finding
- Electricity costs will rise $1400 per family, on average
Steve (WSJ):
- In the 1970s scientists & US gov provided extensive data that Global Cooling was occurring
- Global climate models cannot explain cooling over the last 10 years
- Only FOX News & WSJ are covering the ClimateGate Scandal
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.