We are pushing the EPA to reveal the data they used to justify their endangerment proposal. We need to drop the articles of faith and use the entirety of scientific study on the effects of climate change not a sub-set, chosen by the EPA not for its validity but rather on its ability to forward their policy goal — the regulation of greenhouse gas emissions. The agency used secondary scientific sources, studies that largely weren’t adequately peer-reviewed and the selective use of scientific studies to justify a policy decision they wanted to make. There are many questions to be asked of the EPA, and forgive the Chamber for not accepting “Trust Us” as an answer. To enact effective policy we need transparency and scientific data which is beyond question, not data deemed beyond questioning.
More on our efforts for transparency here
http://www.chamberpost.com/2009/06/transparency-science-and-the-epa.html Congress, not the EPA, is the appropriate authority to deal with such a complex regulatory issue that needs and deserves transparency and rigorous public debate. We urge you to take quick action to help us stop EPA from moving forward with these regulations and to let Congress continue to address the issue.
The EPA’s proposed rule is subject to a 60-day comment period, which ends on December 28, 2009. Please add your digital signature to the letter below and post a comment as to why you oppose this move by the EPA. At the end of the comment period, we will submit the letter and comments to the EPA as part of the official record. Every signature matters.
National Association of Manufacturers
http://namissvr.nam.org/minisites/EPA/index.aspx
BRAVO!!!!!!!!!!!
http://www.chamberpost.com/2009/06/transparency-science-and-the-epa.html
The truth will prevail, it may be a long cold bitter end but it will prevail.
IMPEACH OBAMA,GORE,CLINTON,AXELROD,RAHM and the entire corrupt administration trying to seize communist control over the United States of America!