Skip to comments.
Obama science advisers grilled over hacked e-mails (It's ON!)
AP via Yahoo ^
| 12/3/2009
| SETH BORENSTEIN
Posted on 12/03/2009 9:27:14 AM PST by PreciousLiberty
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 last
To: halfright
Anyone have the lame stream media contact information at hand??
+++++++++++++++++
The same can be said for blue dog RATS that are vulnerable...we need to force them to take a position on this. That will force a larger wedge into the RATS’ posturing on this topic and even on the CRAP and TAX still facing the Senate.
81
posted on
12/03/2009 2:22:41 PM PST
by
SeattleBruce
(God, Family, Church, Country - Keep on Tea Partiers - party like it's 1773!)
To: bert
to keep it simple it is fraud.
It is Bernie Madoff in an academic gown
++++++++++++++++++
Right. Defend *that.* Crickets...
82
posted on
12/03/2009 2:23:54 PM PST
by
SeattleBruce
(God, Family, Church, Country - Keep on Tea Partiers - party like it's 1773!)
To: 20 years too late
Chief among these is Maurice Strong who said in 1990
+++++++++++++++
Sounds like the Van Jones of his time..
83
posted on
12/03/2009 2:25:56 PM PST
by
SeattleBruce
(God, Family, Church, Country - Keep on Tea Partiers - party like it's 1773!)
To: GOYAKLA
Ah, but the steam condensation looks so much more impressive — and the libtard boobs are fooled.
84
posted on
12/03/2009 2:54:59 PM PST
by
expatpat
To: SeattleBruce
Well looky there! I'm a software developer. Have been for more decades than I care to admit to. The "hockey stick" modeling program is just inexcusable. If they had done ANY testing of it (like the Monte Carlo analysis in my prior post), they would have seen there was a problem.
This indicates that they are either incompetent, or deliberately out to deceive. Based on the emails and the "Harry read me" file, I conclude it's the latter.
85
posted on
12/03/2009 3:22:35 PM PST
by
PapaBear3625
(Public healthcare looks like it will work as well as public housing did.)
To: PreciousLiberty
86
posted on
12/03/2009 3:23:36 PM PST
by
Chode
(American Hedonist *DTOM* -ww- I AM JIM THOMPSON!)
To: marktwain
It has changed a bit. Look at my tagline...
87
posted on
12/03/2009 3:40:35 PM PST
by
paudio
(Road to hell is paved by unintended consequences of good intentions)
To: GOYAKLA
"Could anyone explain to me why the media uses pictures of nuclear facilities cooling towers emitting Water Vapor(steam) when they are doing stories on Air Pollution?" They do this for the same reason that they long ago stopped referring to carbon dioxide, instead just shortening it to "carbon." It gives the impression of something dirty and sooty instead of what it actually is - just a harmless invisible gas that is emitted every time we exhale. This alone should cast serious doubt on the whole theory. If you have to resort to deceptive images and buzzwords (propaganda) to sell your theory, then there is every reason to doubt its scientific validity.
88
posted on
12/03/2009 3:44:21 PM PST
by
noiseman
(The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.)
To: GOYAKLA
Neither water vapor nor CO2 are pollutants.
All that steamy water vapor coming off those cooling towers sure looks cool though.
Of course, there are some people that don't like that either. Why Plume Abatement?
89
posted on
12/03/2009 4:35:12 PM PST
by
smokingfrog
(I'm from TEXAS -- what country are YOU from?)
To: chris_bdba
Much of the original data files were thrown away and cannot be recovered. We have no idea what might have been lost or how it might have been manipulated.
Climate change data dumped
90
posted on
12/03/2009 4:44:09 PM PST
by
smokingfrog
(I'm from TEXAS -- what country are YOU from?)
To: ROCKLOBSTER
First of all...what the hell is an “administration scientist”? Is that like the king’s wizards and alchemists?
I picture a guy walking around the white house in a white labcoat carrying a clipboard. Wears glasses, balding, and might be best described as “doughy”.
92
posted on
12/03/2009 5:37:41 PM PST
by
isom35
To: isom35
Perhaps a “pointy headed intellectual” in a lab coat?
93
posted on
12/03/2009 5:43:22 PM PST
by
ROCKLOBSTER
(RATs, nothing more than bald haired hippies.)
To: PreciousLiberty
94
posted on
12/03/2009 6:00:23 PM PST
by
mo
To: GOYAKLA
Could anyone explain to me why the media uses pictures of nuclear facilities cooling towers emitting Water Vapor(steam) when they are doing stories on Air Pollution?
I have been wondering the same thing for years. The media is really the culprit in all the corruption swirling around in Washington D.C. these days. I had an uncle that was a Representative many decades ago (instrumental in starting up the rural electrification administration, REA), and he would be turning over in his grave if he could see how the Congress operates in 2009. In fact I know he would have not sought re-election.
95
posted on
12/03/2009 8:04:40 PM PST
by
Cheerio
(Barack Hussein 0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
To: GOYAKLA; Cheerio
Could anyone explain to me why the media uses pictures of nuclear facilities cooling towers emitting Water Vapor(steam) when they are doing stories on Air Pollution? Sometimes they also use ordinary stacks emitting water vapor. Are they saying water vapor is a pollutant? They are simply revealing their ignorance.
First, they don't realize that it's steam. Second, they wouldn't know that steam is not a pollutant. Instead, they think any industrial emission is "pollution". Tghey're simply not equipped to make distinctions.
Journalists are at the bottom of the IQ scale. And they prove it every day.
96
posted on
12/03/2009 8:17:20 PM PST
by
okie01
(THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance on Parade)
To: Cheerio; smokingfrog; noiseman; expatpat; All
Thanks for the inputs.
My thoughts on global warming are that Herr Goebbels and P.T.Barnum would be proud the climate scaremongers are proving them correct.
97
posted on
12/03/2009 8:58:52 PM PST
by
GOYAKLA
To: 2banana
But they had good intentions!....as did Alinsky, Hitler and Stalin!
98
posted on
12/05/2009 3:59:14 AM PST
by
CRBDeuce
(here, while the internet is still free of the Fairness Doctrine)
To: snowrip
it doesn't change the fact that the world is warming , cooling, spinning, flying thru space, erupting, and in general doing things that worlds all do every day!
99
posted on
12/05/2009 4:01:37 AM PST
by
CRBDeuce
(here, while the internet is still free of the Fairness Doctrine)
To: noiseman
If you have to resort to deceptive images and buzzwords (propaganda) to sell your theory, then there is every reason to doubt its scientific validity. perhaps more directly stated as: Envirocultists had to resort to deceptive images and buzzwords (propaganda) on day one to sell their bogus theory, so there always was every reason to doubt its scientific validity. They resort to the 'nuclear option' at every opportunity! (when they can't use the push grandma down the staircase option) That it took this long for the lie to be outed shows the 'power of the media' when the media has sold out to the left! The 'PSU' gold stamp of approval has turned to the clean end of a turd.
100
posted on
12/06/2009 5:31:25 AM PST
by
CRBDeuce
(here, while the internet is still free of the Fairness Doctrine)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson