Posted on 11/25/2009 1:03:51 PM PST by Smogger
That's always been my contention about the entire Global warming theory. You tell me what data you want to see and I can make it happen. This goes on all the time in "real world." Computer models say what I make them say. If the source isn't open no-one will be the wiser. After all I'm the "expert."
Oh bloody hell I’ve been sitting on these .pro files and such and didn’t even think to open them in stupid notepad to see what the were.
BUMP!
Oh neat comment in the code:
“Apply a VERY ARTIFICAL correction for decline!!”
Bottom line: CRUs evidence is now irrevocably tainted.”
Haven’t you been listening to the Climate Religionists today?
NONE OF THIS MATTERS...
The ONLY thing that matters is the peer reviewed documents based on this data, and they are SO IMPORTANT, that they can never be peer reviewed again!
C’mon DUDE!
You’re threatening the livelyhood of literally HUNDREDS of University Department Grant Programs with your denial of non-science!!!
I mean, where will a fraudulent Climate sciewntist GET another job that pays half a million bucks a year? DO YOU NOT CARE FOR THIER CHILDREN????
Boy, Ill bet Algore regrets inventing the internet now...
“Those 2,500 climate scientists aren’t wrong. They’re liars!”
There NEVER WAS 2,500 Climate Scientists...
At LEAST 1,500 of them were POLITICAL SCIENTISTS, and only a few in the media DARED to ask why that was...
What we need is for someone with enough credibility and visibility to boil it down to a message that can be digested for the ADD public (lather, rinse, repeat) until it's sunk in.
Of course the lamestream media doesn't help because, well, they're lame. And always will be. Damn them all to hell.
Cheers!
Not too techical, but when you intentionally change math forulas and even use rem statements to define why you changed it, it shows the change is INTENTIONAL
And to use a REM statement? It means you wanted to tell yourslf and any one else on your side, ‘”Hey, dont get fooled if you wrote your own code, this one is fudged to be false!”
TRICK??
We may be wrong, Biden said. But the point is, we believe in what were doing. (Uncle Joe Biden)
...and carbon credits are High Priest Algores way of paying indulgeneces to his church of Gaia.
Albore can uninvent the internet as well as 0bama can unjump the shark
The CRU should now be the ACRU - the Anti-Climatic Research Unit.
Global Warming is a fraud. It was established by scientists who wanted to exploit the idea that environmental damage would lead to alarming crisis. It is pretty much what happened in the movie 2012 what many climatologists have said for years. Truth is that it is not really happening anymore than when they predicted Global Cooling. Facts over decades do not back them up.
If NBC’s parent company GE is expecting to make Billions off the Carbon Credits business you can expect NO coverage from them or MSNBC. It is a corrupt situation.
As a kid of 6 years old, I had a chemisty set and I used to randomly mix chemicals to see if I could get color changes or fizzy reactions. That certainly did not make me a chemist. These so-called enviro-scientist are no more scientist than I was at 6.
PS - I did get some really cool reactions occasionally, that I was never able to repeat. My old play area would probably be a toxic waste site today :)
LOL!
I need add no further comment.
The bigger system they are trying to model the more iffy it all is EVEN if they try to do it honestly.
Michael E. Mann (born 28 December 1965) is an American climatologist, and author of more than 80 peer-reviewed journal publications. He has attained public prominence as lead author of a number of articles on paleoclimate and as one of the originators of a graph of temperature trends dubbed the "hockey stick graph" for the shape of the graph. The graph received both praise and criticism after its publication in an Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report. In August 2005 he was appointed Associate Professor at Pennsylvania State University, in the Department of Meteorology and Earth and Environmental Systems Institute, and Director of the university's interdepartmental Earth System Science Center. He previously taught at the University of Virginia, in the Department of Environmental Sciences (1999 - 2005). He was a Lead Author on the Observed Climate Variability and Change chapter of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Third Scientific Assessment Report (2001). He has been organizing committee chair for the National Academy of Sciences Frontiers of Science and has served as a committee member or advisor for other National Academy of Sciences panels. He served as editor for the Journal of Climate and has been a member of numerous international and U.S. scientific advisory panels and steering groups. Dr. Mann has been the recipient of several fellowships and prizes, including selection as one of the 50 leading visionaries in Science and Technology by Scientific American, the outstanding scientific publication award of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), and recognition by the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI) for notable citation of his refereed scientific research. Mann is one of several climate scientists who contribute to the RealClimate blog. He is best known for his paleoclimate 'hockey stick' reconstructions of the past several millennia from tree ring, ice core, coral and other data. See temperature record of the past 1000 years for more details and dispute. Mann's recent work has been on modelling El Niño, and he has said that "we are already committed to 50 to 100 years of global warming and several centuries of sea level rise" and that reduction in fossil fuel emissions is required to slow the process down to a level that can be coped with.[1]
Wicki
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.