CRU's Source Code: Climategate Uncovered

American Thinker ^ | 11/25/2009 | Marc Sheppard

[fhayek]

Michael “Con” Mann, and his tree ring circus.

[w1andsodidwe]

The bigger system they are trying to model the more iffy it all is EVEN if they try to do it honestly.

I think maybe modeling and honesty are not compatible. I think when you start with an assumption and throw out any data that does not prove the assumption, then your results are worthless.

[Anti-Bubba182]

You know it HAS to be BS when they cannot forecast Weather beyond a few days accurately. These models are not about science, they are about money, ideology and political power. They might as well be reading the entrails of an animal sacrifice.

[Yardstick]

*snort*

[Girlene]

WOW, let the fun continue.

[tbw2]

The timing of this huge release before a “global warming treaty to blow our collective economy” meeting next week does lend to that conclusion.

[homegroan]

“Boy, I’ll bet Algore regrets inventing the internet now...”

LMAO!!!!

SZQ

[20 years too late]

As I understand it, there were 1900 “social scientist” and 600 “real” scientists...many of these “real” scientist did not realize they were going to be included on the UN list and threaten a law suit in order to be removed. I think the final list of “real” scientist on the list is somewhere around 52 to 56.

[Qout]

So, as I read this, the “fudge factor” for 1964 to 1994 would be 2.6 x 0.75 degrees C or +3.5 degrees Fahrenheit!

[fhayek]

I always understood that the models have been problematic from the start. If you ran the models forward from the early twentieth century, you didn’t get current empirical results. And if you ran it backwards, you didn’t line up with actual temperatures from a century ago. So the models are faulty and their observations have been fudged. Settled science?

[Psycho_Bunny]

wow...I’d like to see the whole procedure.

[w1andsodidwe]

I keep hearing that 95% of scientist agree. I have a relative who is a well respected and well known scientist. He bought this hook line and sinker. He threw that 95% number at me in an email.

I asked him a simple questions "Does a geneticist's vote for example have the same weight as a climatologist or meteorologist's vote.

He wrote back and told me that he had forgotten to mention that this was just weather scientists not all scientists.

I of course snickered, because it has always been nothing but all scientist.

I have since this all came about sent him an email asking about his coworker who is involved in the emails. He has not gotten back to me yet.

[afraidfortherepublic]

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/11/24/must-see-video-climategate-spoof-from-minnesotans-for-global-warming/

[cpdiii]

I literally “LOLed” when I read they had the climate scammers’ source code! I just heard on Fox this may not be a hacker's work, but an inside whistle blower. I can just see a disgruntled programmer doing this.

I suspect he or she is simply a patriot.

[afraidfortherepublic]

See #53

[kempo]

Now that there is a crack in the dam that’s been holding back the lies, the leaks will start pouring out at a steady rate. It’s going to be fun watching all of the finger pointing between the climate scientist.

[PeaceBeWithYou]

[fhayek]

outstanding.

[Danae]

OMG

Oh now that is the coders Nukler BOMB.

Hugh and Series.

No seriously, this is RED HOT. Heads should ROLL.

[Doogle]

POSIC Odumbo will be off to Copenhagen to play the game and pledge the US into oblivion