There's a sucker born every minute.
1 posted on
11/09/2009 9:29:42 AM PST by
MaestroLC
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
To: MaestroLC
Hey, yellowdogs...got your Hope and Change right HERE.
2 posted on
11/09/2009 9:31:57 AM PST by
50sDad
(The Left cannot understand life is not in a test tube. Raise taxes, & jobs go away.)
To: MaestroLC
There will be no conference report. The Senate will not pass any bill.
3 posted on
11/09/2009 9:31:57 AM PST by
mwl8787
To: MaestroLC
Every single Democrat in the House needs to be booted out of office in 2010.
The lone Republican and any others who voted for this bill needs to be booted out of office in 2010.
They are totally out of control.
No money for abortions.
No money for illegals.
Serious restrictions on lawsuits regarding medical efforts.
The only ‘winners’ in this bill are the Tort Lawyers.
To: MaestroLC
"I am confident that when it comes back from the conference committee that that language won't be there," Wasserman Schultz said during an appearance on MSNBC. "And I think we're all going to be working very hard, particularly the pro-choice members, to make sure that's the case." And when that happens, most of the RATS who said the amendment had to be in there in order for them to vote Yes will still vote Yes.
5 posted on
11/09/2009 9:33:11 AM PST by
Dahoser
(The missus and I joined the NRA. Who says Obama can't inspire conservatives?)
To: MaestroLC
I must be the dumbest guy on the block. Let me see. The House Bill wouldn’t have passed without the Abortion Amendment. So, Wasserman-Schultz says she is confident it will be stripped out in Conference with the Senate Bill (Which still has a long way to go). So, if it gets stripped out, what makes her think those pro-life Democrats will vote for it then when they wouldn’t vote for it unless it was in there last Saturday? Can anybody explain this to me?
To: MaestroLC
"The amendment, offered by Rep. Bart Stupak (D-Mich.), won the support of
Republicans one stupid SOB RINO and some centrist Democrats in the House."
OK...
9 posted on
11/09/2009 9:36:50 AM PST by
jessduntno
(TOTUS fails and POtuS becomes a phuttering stuck.)
To: MaestroLC
Stupak is just a useful idiot for the Dems.
To: MaestroLC
the Senate cant pass this nonsense. The result of this passing is just unimaginable .. i foresee another revolution if they force this crap on us.
11 posted on
11/09/2009 9:38:02 AM PST by
eak3
To: MaestroLC
Debbie is a mindless robot and Nancy’s pet gerbil.
12 posted on
11/09/2009 9:38:02 AM PST by
clintonh8r
(My country. Not my government.)
To: MaestroLC
She is a very slimy POS, even for a ‘rat.
To: MaestroLC
That puts them on record.
15 posted on
11/09/2009 9:39:41 AM PST by
listenhillary
(A "cult of personality" arises when a leader uses mass media creating idealized/heroic public image)
To: MaestroLC
Was there ever any doubt?
17 posted on
11/09/2009 9:42:04 AM PST by
Rutles4Ever
(Ubi Petrus, ibi ecclesia, et ubi ecclesia vita eterna!)
To: MaestroLC
This was the problem of tying one's objections to this dog of a bill to that ONE issue. Once that was supposedly removed, those who had objected had nowhere to go. But their constituents, especially the truly pro-life ones could see through the charade of the Stupak amendment, even if the Blue Dogs couldn't or wouldn't.
If nothing else, the exchange between John Boehner and Charlie Rangel on the floor of the house on Friday should have been a wake up call. Boehner asked Rangel if the Democrats would guarantee that abortion funding wouldn't be put back IN the bill when it went to the Reconciliation Committee. Rangel essentially laughed in Boehner's face, and said NO, there were no guarantees. So the Blue Dogs and Joseph Cao, who got their 'assurances' with the Stupak Amendment, will get sold down the river when the bill gets to Reconciliation.
18 posted on
11/09/2009 9:44:51 AM PST by
SuziQ
To: MaestroLC
****There’s a sucker born every minute. ****
Not if they are aborted first!
Ok, that was cruel!
20 posted on
11/09/2009 9:47:26 AM PST by
Ruy Dias de Bivar
(The sword does not kill. It is a tool in the killer's hand.---Lucius Annaeus Seneca)
To: MaestroLC
That woman has DEAD EYES....There is NO kindness, love, NOTHING behind her eyes.....SOULLESS.
21 posted on
11/09/2009 9:50:03 AM PST by
Ann Archy
(Abortion,,,,,,the Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
To: MaestroLC
There's a sucker born every minute.Too bad there are several hours worth of them in the House.
To: MaestroLC
Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Fla.)Anyone know if this is one of those "Pro-Choice Catholics"?
To: MaestroLC
30 posted on
11/09/2009 10:05:09 AM PST by
Cheerio
(Barack Hussein 0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
To: MaestroLC
The one benefit of Stupak was that it was a bit like William Wilberforce's tactic that finally ended the slave trade. Wilberforce and his allies took away the broad protection that allowed
all trade along the triangle trade route to be protected from war-time boarding. They did this by making it illegal for a ship to change its colors after leaving a given port. Immediately, the vast majority of the slave trade was halted. The slave-trade monies that went to buy off the supporters in Parliament dried up, so support in Parliament dwindled very quickly.
Similarly, if the government takes over the health-insurance business, and no government money is allowed to go to pay for abortions, then almost immediately the vast majority of abortion in this country would cease. This would dry up the funding to the Democratic Party from groups like Planned Parenthood. There would be no economic incentive for Democratic politicians to support abortion. Within a few decades (once the effect reverberated up to composition of Supreme Court nominees), abortion on demand would cease. That was the only positive of this bill. If Stupak is stripped, it will lose a lot of support.
32 posted on
11/09/2009 10:45:41 AM PST by
Thane_Banquo
(The GOP: The Big Tent with a Fifth Column.)
To: MaestroLC
I am always surprised how many people seem to have no fear of God at all. Debbie Wasserman Schultz is just recovering from some type of cancer, I do not understand people that do not turn to the Lord when they are facing life and death issues? We should turn to the Lord before things go bad, but at least when we are face to face with death/cancer, you would think people would be sober about things?
But not Debbie Wasserman Schultz, No she spits right in the Lords face, shortly after winning a successful battle against cancer.
God Bless Debbie and all like her.
35 posted on
11/09/2009 11:55:20 AM PST by
Friendofgeorge
(Hey Zero, Where are your missing school records? I LOVE SARAH)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson