Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lindsey Graham warns GOP against going too far right [defends Fiorina, attacks DeMint, Hoffman]
Politico ^ | 2009-11-04 | Manu Raju

Posted on 11/04/2009 5:02:37 PM PST by rabscuttle385

The morning after Republicans lost an upstate New York House seat, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) warned that conservative activists will bring destruction to the Republican Party if they drive out moderate candidates across the country.

“To those people who are pursuing purity, you’ll become a club not a party,” Graham told POLITICO in the Capitol Wednesday. “Those people who are trying to embrace conservatism in a thoughtful way that fits the region and the state and the district are going to do well. Conservativism is an asset. Blind ideology is not.”

Graham, who has sparred with his party’s right wing on issues ranging from climate change to Guantanamo Bay to Sonia Sotomayor’s Supreme Court nomination, warned that those concerned about the state of the GOP should help find candidates who are electable — not ones who adhere to a particular type of ideology. And he said that both the GOP nominee, Dede Scozzafava and the conservative party candidate Doug Hoffman were both out of the mainstream of the upstate New York district – which lead to the victory of Democrat Bill Owens Tuesday night.

(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Politics/Elections; US: California; US: New York; US: South Carolina
KEYWORDS: ca2010; demint; devore; diablo; fiorina; graham4obama; grahamantipalin; hoffman; lindseygraham; mccainmutiny; mclamesrevenge; ny23; recallhisass; rino; rinoparty; scozzafava; sonofabitch; teapartyrebellion; time2partyagain
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-142 next last
To: rabscuttle385
Lindsey Graham warns GOP against going too far right [defends Fiorina, attacks DeMint, Hoffman]

Hey, Lindsey: E. S. A. D.!
121 posted on 11/04/2009 9:15:25 PM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385
Not in Graham's exact words, thought the intent and effect are obviously very similar, this was also said about Thomas Jefferson and the republicans when they refused to abandon their principles and cede to the federalists.
The former was elected twice, followed by fellow republicans Madison and Monroe.
It's fortunate for Lindsey Graham that he was not around at the time. The penalty for being a homosexual were quite severe then.
122 posted on 11/04/2009 9:30:36 PM PST by jla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

If I were Twinkletoes, I would be worried about conservatives, too. “Ohhhhh Noooooo! Keep those conservatives out of our pup tent, Johnny! Quick, zipper up the door, Mitt, so they can’t see we’re in here! Be vewy, vewy quiet and maybe they will go away.”


123 posted on 11/04/2009 9:38:14 PM PST by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385; upchuck; fieldmarshaldj; BillyBoy; Clintonfatigued

Linds: “To those people who are pursuing purity, you’ll become a club not a party,”

So Graham is just like all the freepers who say that exact same thing whenever some says they won’t vote for a LIBERAL DIABLO piece of detritus (not an actual moderate). Can’t see the difference between a moderate and a Dede Scuzzobama Linds? I’m sick of trying to explain the distinction.

That guy really needs to shut his mouth, it would raise his approval ratings if he never spoke.


124 posted on 11/04/2009 9:41:56 PM PST by Impy (RED=COMMUNIST, NOT REPUBLICAN | NO "INDIVIDUAL MANDATE"!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

“Graham, who has sparred with his party’s right wing on issues ranging from climate change to Guantanamo Bay to Sonia Sotomayor’s Supreme Court nomination, warned that those concerned about the state of the GOP should help find candidates who are electable — not ones who adhere to a particular type of ideology. “

RINO ideology in a nutshell


125 posted on 11/04/2009 9:55:24 PM PST by headstamp 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

“And he said that both the GOP nominee, Dede Scozzafava and the conservative party candidate Doug Hoffman were both out of the mainstream of the upstate New York district – which lead to the victory of Democrat Bill Owens Tuesday night.”

This moron from the stupid party doesn’t have a damned clue.


126 posted on 11/04/2009 9:56:30 PM PST by headstamp 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RonnieFan

good point...use his own argument against him


127 posted on 11/04/2009 10:00:04 PM PST by wardaddy (folks, these freepathons are taking too long tightwads, shame on us in front of the kooks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

Comment #128 Removed by Moderator

To: rabscuttle385
“To those people who are pursuing purity, you’ll become a club not a party,”

I insist that any politician I support fully oppose mudering innocent babies.

Anyone who saracastically labels that principled stance 'pursuing purity' is a jack@ss.

Graham also bounces around the Michael Steel Echo Chamber by advocating for a 'conservatism' that "fits the region and the state and the district."

That is the new buzz phrase for excusing the inclusion of social liberals under the Republican banner. According to Steele-Gingrich-Graham, conservative positions on social issues are not necessary for Republican candidates, but are disposable and thus malleable district to district.

129 posted on 11/04/2009 11:29:24 PM PST by Z in Washington
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: headstamp 2

If they lack shared ideology, they will lack shared positions on the issues.

In that case, why vote for them?

Out of an affinity for the letters G O P ???


130 posted on 11/04/2009 11:31:37 PM PST by Z in Washington
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
Very adept photoshopping.


131 posted on 11/04/2009 11:38:54 PM PST by Z in Washington
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385
It can't happen too soon.

Good-bye Lindsthy. Enjoy your irrelevance.

132 posted on 11/04/2009 11:47:15 PM PST by Carry_Okie (Grovelnator Schwarzenkaiser, fashionable fascism one charade at a time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

Hey Lindsey the democrats are looking for a few good men!!!


133 posted on 11/05/2009 4:33:59 AM PST by GregB (According to The Constitution Sarah Palin is eligible to be President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

“You can neuter Lindsey (until his removal in 2014) by purging his mentor, Juan...in next year’s Arizona Senate election. “

We have to come up with a viable CANDIDATE first, Rabs. As of now we don’t have one.


134 posted on 11/05/2009 5:05:08 AM PST by stephenjohnbanker (Support our troops, and vote out the RINO's!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Doohickey

You know though Strom Thurmond himself moved steadily to the left to keep that SC Senate seat through all the changing social times. Even Strom knew that SC people are more liberal than New Yorkers think they are. Strom even voted for King Day in 1983, as Jesse Helms led the hopeless opposition.


135 posted on 11/05/2009 6:15:27 AM PST by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker

People in AZ will keep McPain because they enjoy self-flagellation.


136 posted on 11/05/2009 6:16:20 AM PST by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.

“People in AZ will keep McPain because they enjoy self-flagellation.”

No we don’t. Do you have any idea how hard it is to get rid of a long long time incumbent? McCain is backed by big money out of state, and some in state as well. The only one who could murder him is J.D. Hayworth. Hayworth got trashed by Bush/Rove, because he wouldn’t cow tow to amnesty. Others could win, but are up against that big money. Without a viable candidate willing to run, what the hell can we do?


137 posted on 11/05/2009 6:45:49 AM PST by stephenjohnbanker (Support our troops, and vote out the RINO's!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385
Grahamish pussyfooting is the problem, firmly putting the conservative foot down is the answer.
138 posted on 11/05/2009 6:59:12 AM PST by F.J. Mitchell (America is ailin'-the cure is Palin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: omega4179
How do we get rid of him? vote for the dem?

Tried that in '08. Didn't work.

139 posted on 11/05/2009 8:31:55 AM PST by thulldud (It HAS happened here!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

Amen to that. That’s exactly how I feel. Clean out the crap.


140 posted on 11/05/2009 9:32:07 AM PST by gimme1ibertee ("In a time of universal deceit,telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act"-G. Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-142 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson