Frowning takes 68 muscles.
Smiling takes 6.
Pulling this trigger takes 2.
I'm lazy.
Posted on 10/27/2009 8:38:39 AM PDT by ConservativeStatement
WYCKOFF, N.J. — Twelve Jersey girls have shed their clothes to pose for a calendar to raise awareness about prostate cancer.
Proceeds from “Stand By Your Man: 12 Women in Support of a Cure for Prostate Cancer” will go to the Prostate Cancer Coalition of New Jersey.
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
I would look at her with horror, then I would immediately kill her with a quick gunshot to the temple.
Since I have no children, her appearance would signify a huge rift in the space-time contiuum, and she would need to be killed quickly so that the normal time-flow could be restored.
I have a granddaughter who is being instructed on morality by my son, who I instructed on morality. I feel sure my son has taught her the precious nature of her privacy and the importance of clear conscience before God and man. Had I a daughter, I would teach those lessons as she was growing up, to instill in her the necessary taboos which serve to protect her soul and body.
Yeah, they found a way to justify their weird desire to be an exhibitionist. How original.
LOL, Post of the day man !!
Ya know, there’s nothing new under the sun about nudity. If the cause is worthwhile, nudity doesn’t have to be involved. In a sense, this particular idea is adding insult to injury since the victims of prostate cancer typically also suffer from ED.
Couldn’t they just bake cookies or make lasagne or something??
According to modern physicists, the very act you perform in shooting her, thus embracing the sudden branch inherent in her appearance in your daughterless continuum, causes a separate spacetime continuum to flow from that moment onward ... while the stream from which the branch occurred continues on without being altered by the branching ... you started it, Laz. This is the stuff of them ‘virtual particles’ and ‘virtual continua’.
O.k. Now every Freeper that reads your post is thinking, 'why didn't I think of that first?'
Oh no!
Two-thirds of a PUN: PU! :-)
This is the first such thread I’ve run across with no calls for pictures. Took it upon yourself, did you?
Wyckoff or ....
I would look at her with horror, then I would immediately kill her with a quick gunshot to the temple. Since I have no children, her appearance would signify a huge rift in the space-time contiuum, and she would need to be killed quickly so that the normal time-flow could be restored.According to modern physicists, the very act you perform in shooting her, thus embracing the sudden branch inherent in her appearance in your daughterless continuum, causes a separate spacetime continuum to flow from that moment onward ... while the stream from which the branch occurred continues on without being altered by the branching ... you started it, Laz. This is the stuff of them ‘virtual particles’ and ‘virtual continua’.
I propose that the shooting of my non-existant daughter would pose such a contiuum-paradox, that the act of shooting her would alter the fabric of spacetime in such a way that no other reality-branches COULD occur. So, with one bullet, I would completely change the nature of all possible realities.
Which, for me, is just another typical Saturday night.
LOLOL!!! I am humbled by your photoshop skills...
That’s hot.
Where’s the link to the pictures so many are complaining about? I can’t seem to find it.
I’d hit it.
That would be a difficult proposition since they're, you know, women and all.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.