Posted on 10/15/2009 10:23:32 PM PDT by Red Steel
Witness comes forward, history of Internet "Rumour" documented.
(Excerpt) Read more at en.wordpress.com ...
I don’t have time to listen to the whole thing right now, but it appears that it could be. Someone who knows how PLEASE save the video in post #41 before it gets pulled off youtube.
THANKS FREEDOM9! And you might post this as a brand new thread if possible.
I have them saved. But probably won’t watch them.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=53QapiHA0Lg
http://www.kissyoutube.com/watch?v=53QapiHA0Lg
Add “kiss” in front of youtube and you can save videos from youtube
It will be released the day after the release of the photo, so hyped before the 1992 and 1996 elections, showing Bill Clinton, as a Rhodes Scholar, attending an anti-Vietnam War demonstration in England, where an American flag was burned.
And a day before the 1963 photo showing Adolf Hitler sitting on the veranda of an Argentine ranch house, dictating his memoirs to Martin Borman.
/sarcasm
It would be a sad day for American history if it were allowed to continue well after Obama has left office to continue the charade game of protecting an usurper in the Whitehouse.
And the millions if not billions of dollars to revise all textbooks so that future generations know the REAL truth, that Obama never planned on the ascension to POTUS but when the wave was high and moving fast his handlers decided to ride it as far as they could and like winning a Superlotto Obama was elected.
But the real and I stress, REAL problem is that he cannot legally be POTUS and no amount of media blitz can prove he is a legitimate POTUS.
His legal bills should be well over 2 million by now in attorney fees to keep up the charade, and exponentially will grow, and then it will escalate to whatever degree that any person questioning his legitamicy can be arrested and jailed as political prisoners.
Or is America already a political prisoner?
i’m in the process of watching the 2nd video right now. The first one was not the smoking gun.
I tend to agree with your assessment of Charlton. The blog has had some great posts but this one about the CSPAN video just seems totally out of whack.
I don’t understand why people post things without proper verification. These guys are destined to go the route of the African Press International (API) with their Michele tape, and WND with their story about the Ark of the Covenant.
Our country is under seige from within and the only way out is the truth.
Closest I could find was Obama in second debate:
What you’re interested in is solving problems like jobs, and health care, and education. I’m not running to be the minister of Illinois. I’m running to be its United States Senator
An endeavor for accuracy.
Check out this from #34 (paragraphed for easier reading).
Leo Donofrio actually kicked John Charlton and his blog Post & Email off his site, permanently banned him. This was Donofrio's post, ed. is Donofrio. I do not trust Charlton, and I think that the debunking of the myth he posted about today on his blog and debunked by FR here this early morning JUSTIFIED Donofrio in banning him. Do not trust that site.
I think it also justifies Donofrio's position that Charlton is part of the distraction effort, and validates the opinion that Donofrio is on the right track with the Hawaiian inquiries and with the fact that Obama's father is British. Which precludes Obama from ever having the Natural Born Citizenship status required for the office of POTUS.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2363686/posts#34
Also #47 and #48.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2363686/posts?page=47#47
RS,
Several months ago, I made inquiries searching for this footage. Someone e-mailed personally and claimed to have actually seen in on YOUTUBE, but that it wasn’t during the debates, but rather backstage (recorded with a home video camera). Supposedly, Keyes posed the question to BO (off set) and BO replied with the comment: “That’s OK...I’m not running for President, just Senator...”.
I think he was trying to set a “GO BACK” feature on his computer to find it, but it couldn’t be retrieved. Then I rec’d an e-mail (or possibly reply from a FR post) from someone claiming to be an assistant of Kreeps or Keyes, stating that it never happened ?
Nothing would please me more that to locate it...either it happened and someone got bribed to erase it, or it never occurred and is just a rumor ?
To date, very few, if any witnesses have stated with 100%
assurance that they personally observed this and can vouche for its authenticity.
That’s all I know....good luck !
I have searching for this video of the debate for over a year and can’t find it. I know it’s been scrubbed from way back, but hope upon hope that I could find it somewhere.
He has, many times!!! He’s petititoned CSPAN to release the tapes of the debate and hasn’t gotten anywhere with it.
Please see post #32 and #35.
It along with the other debate, including the Radio debate are at Cspan Video Archives. I was able to find them in under 5 min. I also watched the. The claim is false. The conversation as reported in Post & Email as having happened in the debate is NOT in any of the videos of the debates.
It did not happen.
You can watch all of the debates on CSPAN. I did so last night. took almost 4.5 hours to do too.
BTW, the Constitution required Obama to have been a US citizen for at least nine years to be eligible for the US Senate. Obama has yet to provide any bona fide documentation proving he has been a US citizen at any point in his life whatsoever! So the possibility remains that he was constitutionally unqualified for the US Senate during his entire time spent there. That, despite Obama's alleged retort to Keyes to the effect that he was "running for the US Senate." Now, if Obama flouted the constitutional provisions for the Senate qualification in 2004 and went unchallenged, his bravado would lead him to believe that the Constitution would be no impediment to his bid for the presidency in 2008 as well.
You're right. It didn't. It's an internet myth.
I’m sorry if a steady defense of a good friend and a serious patriot annoys you. But, thanks for setting the record straight.
One backhanded compliment deserves another.
touché
:-)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.