Skip to comments.
The Most Amazing Invention
Youtube ^
Posted on 10/14/2009 1:04:01 PM PDT by Maceman
Salt water as the ultimate fuel.
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-66 next last
1
posted on
10/14/2009 1:04:02 PM PDT
by
Maceman
To: Maceman
Mr Kansius was an amazing indivual, May God rest his soul.
2
posted on
10/14/2009 1:07:16 PM PDT
by
Pietro
To: Maceman
I was going to hope someone invented the spine for Republican politicians.
3
posted on
10/14/2009 1:07:31 PM PDT
by
A CA Guy
( God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
To: Maceman
Hmmm, very interesting. I wonder what the efficiency is.
4
posted on
10/14/2009 1:09:15 PM PDT
by
Blood of Tyrants
(The Second Amendment. Don't MAKE me use it.)
To: Maceman
The most amazing invention according to my neighbor is the Thermos Bottle!
5
posted on
10/14/2009 1:09:47 PM PDT
by
Red_Devil 232
(VietVet - USMC All Ready On The Right? All Ready On The Left? All Ready On The Firing Line!)
To: Maceman
Absolutely..........remarkable.
To: A CA Guy
I was going to hope someone invented the spine for Republican politicians. Instead you get a perpetual RINO machine. |
7
posted on
10/14/2009 1:11:39 PM PDT
by
Nick Danger
(Free cheese is found only in mousetraps)
To: Blood of Tyrants
"Hmmm, very interesting. I wonder what the efficiency is." I'm guessing it takes considerable energy to run whatever RF generator he's using - probably much more energy than he's seeing in output energy from his saltwater reaction.
8
posted on
10/14/2009 1:14:26 PM PDT
by
OldDeckHand
(No Socialized Medicine, No Way, No How, No Time)
To: Maceman
The inventor passed away last year, a true modern day Edison. But we have to rely on way cool, chin pubbed college kids for all the inventions right? If it doesn’t come out of Cal Tech, MIT or some other moldy university and is found to be of some political as well as practical use it never sees the light of day. It gets in some journal and is spoken about by sweater vest wearing intellectuals at the fall mixer. Find a way to clone polar bears it's on the vening news and gets gobs of funding, anything to fuel the engine of commerce and capitalism...well that is not important. It's never about clean energy its about control. Now windfarms and solar are not good enough for the Nazis, its simply us living in TeePees.
9
posted on
10/14/2009 1:14:54 PM PDT
by
pburgh01
To: Maceman
It’s easy to separate water into hydrogen and O2.
It’s doing it with less energy than you get out of it that so far can’t be done.
The laws of physics say it is not possible.
10
posted on
10/14/2009 1:15:16 PM PDT
by
counterpunch
(In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem. Government is the problem.)
To: Maceman
That is not new and it takes as much to power it as it produces. Zero sum game.
11
posted on
10/14/2009 1:16:39 PM PDT
by
org.whodat
(Vote: Chuck De Vore in 2012.)
To: counterpunch
The laws of physics say it is not possible. There's always a spoilsport in the crowd to point out those undeniable truths, LOL
To: OldDeckHand
I'm guessing it takes considerable energy to run whatever RF generator he's using...And therein lies the problem. It's all about energy in vs. energy out.
13
posted on
10/14/2009 1:17:42 PM PDT
by
randog
(Tap into America!)
To: counterpunch
YEs, our Space Shuttle is a fancy old steam engine.
14
posted on
10/14/2009 1:17:58 PM PDT
by
JudgemAll
(control freaks, their world & their problem with my gun and my protecting my private party)
To: Maceman
The radio waves require an electrical current, which requires a generator, which requires a fossil fuel (or nuke).
Can’t get something for nothing. The energy released by the burning hydrogen must be less than the energy stored in the burned fossil fuel that runs the electric plant that runs the radio generator.
Sorry, that’s the physics of it.
To: OldDeckHand
"I'm guessing it takes considerable energy to run whatever RF generator he's using - probably much more energy than he's seeing in output energy from his saltwater reaction."
Indeed... I'm not broadcast engineer, but I believe that conventionally it requires electricity to emit RF transmitting.
Perhaps you could work out a method making the process efficient by researching the perfect type of RF emission to generate the hydrolysis so that the least amount of energy is used, but what is the ratio?
16
posted on
10/14/2009 1:18:26 PM PDT
by
z3n
To: Maceman
Cool, now we can boil off the oceans!
17
posted on
10/14/2009 1:19:31 PM PDT
by
Lx
(Do you like it, do you like it. Scott? I call it Mr. and Mrs. Tennerman chili.)
To: org.whodat
That is not new and it takes MORE to power it than it produces. Negative sum game.
To: OldDeckHand
That’s what I was wondering. So the key is the burning of the salt water has to produce enough energy to power the radio transmitter and whatever is left is what you can use.
Since you are burning a fuel it is possible that there is a net power surplus. Now they just need to make it effecient.
19
posted on
10/14/2009 1:20:27 PM PDT
by
for-q-clinton
(If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
To: Maceman
Oh, if you do want to achieve a power break through, figure how to produce and control balled lightning.
20
posted on
10/14/2009 1:21:38 PM PDT
by
org.whodat
(Vote: Chuck De Vore in 2012.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-66 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson