Posted on 10/14/2009 7:40:10 AM PDT by kellynla
Orly Taitz gets Joy Behar very nervous about the Obama Eligibility case.
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
I honestly don’t know what is wrong with the people who latch on to these threads to bash Orly.
I’m beginning to wonder how many trolls there are on this website.
I hold the same opinion you do: Maybe she’s nuts, maybe she’s not.
"(I didn’t watch the video; just offering opinion)"
You may want to watch the video. Joy Behar asked Orly why she was so nervous. Orly did hold her ground against Behar though.
I would hardly say Behar was “nervous”
I can’t stand her, but she’s great composure.
“LoL plays a nut!? She’s a flaming obama acorn toe sucker.. She’s not fakin her nuttiness.”
Thought about that after I posted, yer probably right.
Excellent idea. Can we include the requirement to see a real paper copy of the long form held by the Hawaii DoH? I do not want to question another internet only Photoshoped generated version.
I am in for $1OO. Can we get 2,000 people donating $100.
Add me to the list of FR trolls who think Orly Taitz is nuts.
Thanks
Not proof, in a legal sense, but he claims his father was never a US citizen, ever. That's enough. It might be a little harder to understand than if, which is still possible, he was born abroad, and was never a citizen at all, or was later naturalized, but it's still enough for a disqualification.
Now for legal proof, you'd need his birth certificate, a real paper one, certified with raised seal, and possibly with affidavits. You'd also need some proof, that the person named on that BC as his father (if any!) was indeed not a US Citizen. In that I'm at somewhat of a loss how legal proof could be obtained. Maybe the government of Kenya would provide proof of citizenship for BHO Sr, whereas they'd be loathe to provide any such proof, if it exists, about BHO II's. Perhaps Visa records are maintained? If so they'd show British National BHO entering in '59, extending in '62, when he went to Harvard, and perhaps in between. (Or perhaps U of H, and Harvard) would have records of foreign students?)
But even the possibility, if even only somewhat probable, that an ineligible person sits in the Oval Office, and acts as Commander in Chief, ought to give you the willies. It should also be the starting point for whatever investigations can be conducted.
An honest man would be fully cooperating with those investigations, as long as they were limited to the single question of eligibility. In an earlier case, his lawyers claimed something on the long form would be deeply and personally embarrassing. Now what could that be? Bastardy perhaps, or a father other than BHO Sr. is about the extent of what it could be, that is not already known, such as his mother being "Caucasian", and still not constitute being ineligible, which would certainly be deeply embarrassing, to say the least.
“Also, I’ve never heard of a Birther who also is a “truther.”
Oh neither have I. I am actually quite open to the BC issue, call me an agnostic. The problem I have with this whole thing is not the issue, it is the mouthpiece.
Thank you for donating to sane attorneys who are seeking the court to force the documents to be revelaed so the truth can be known.
I called it the "secret special combination of Indonesian law, 18th Century Swiss legal theory and Kenyan interview with an old lady that will make it like the last year never happened, and somehow Dick Cheney will be proclaimed president."
Just watched the Video! WOW!! A MUST VIEW!! ORLY Clobbered Joy Behar! Joy looked like she was wetting her pants by the end of the Interview!!! TOO MUCH!! The Japanese know he is a Fraud too, just as PUTIN told Us months ago!! A TRUE AMERICAN TRAGEDY!! Considering this Fraud is desecrating The Office of POTUS!!
Where’s Orly Taitz from?
There are two and only two types of American citizens: Natural born (born in America) and naturalized (immigrated to America). Only natural born citizens type may aspire to the office of the presidency. Naturalized citizens are denied this, a concession they must make to take part in the naturalization process.
The birther fantasy of "natural born citizen" requiring two U.S. citizen parents, if implemented, would render millions of American born citizens ineligible for the presidency, in essence creating a second class of citizens with less rights those American born citizens whose parents were citizens.
Fortunately, this birther definition is just that, a fictional device created solely to deny eligibility to Obama and outside of the birther circle is taken seriously by nobody and, in fact, was rendered moot the moment that Chief Justice Roberts swore in a man whose foreign father is a matter of public record to the office of the presidency.
Taking the above into consideration, it appears that my definition of "natural born citizen" is currently the Law of the Land while the birthers' fictional definition has been laughed out of courtroom after courtroom.
So, who are the delusional ones who refuse to accept the facts?
AMEN!! FANTASTIC POST!! THANK YOU MUCHLY!...:-)
May GOD Continue to BLESS AMERICA!!
AKA, an assumption. Never adjudicated. But as far as being a citizen by birth, neither parent need be a US citizen. (Nor, AFAIK, even a legal resident) at least according to several adjudications. Wong Kim Ark, for example, who was the child of two aliens, although lawfully in the country.
BTW, BHO Sr was not a resident, he was a foreign student, a nonresident alien for immigration purposes. He was (probably) legally present in the US, but he was not a resident.
Your list is 32 items long...yet the only threads I see repeated over and over and over again are the BC threads...everyday, no fewer than 2 threads focusing on the BC...that’s it.
I would if there were any.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.